Giddings v. Insurance Company

Decision Date01 October 1880
PartiesGIDDINGS v. INSURANCE COMPANY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.

This is a suit in equity by Loren Giddings and Leander Giddings, administrators of Silas Giddings, deceased, to compel the specific performance, by the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, of its alleged contract, made with him some months prior to his death, to insure his life in the sum of $6,000. The court below dismissed the bill, whereupon the complainants appealed here.

The remaining facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Mr. Henry G. Miller and Mr. Thomas G. Frost for the appellants.

Mr. Thomas Hoyne, contra.

MR. JUSTICE SWAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts of this case necessary to be considered are few and simple. They are clearly disclosed in the record, and there is no conflict between the parties about them.

The appellee is a corporation created by the State of Wisconsin. Its principal office and place of business were at Milwaukee. It was authorized to insure lives. Dean & Payne were its agents at Chicago. The extent of their authority was to receive applications, forward them to the office at Milwaukee, and, when risks were taken, to receive, countersign, and deliver the policies, collecting in all cases, before the latter was done, the first premium from the assured.

On or about the 6th of August, 1872, a member of the firm of Roberts & Hubbard, of the county of Warren, in the State of Illinois, at the instance of Silas Giddings, Sen., of the same county, presented to Dean & Payne, at Chicago, an application, in due form, for a life insurance policy, insuring Giddings in the sum of $6,000. The application consisted of a printed form furnished previously by Dean & Payne. It contained blanks to be filled with answers of the applicant to the questions propounded, and was filled up accordingly. Dean & Payne immediately forwarded it to Milwaukee. On the 24th of the same month the company considered the application and decided to issue the policy. It was issued accordingly, and bears date on that day. The premium to be paid by the assured was $302.52. The policy was immediately sent to Dean & Payne. Not being called for, on the 2d of October following they returned it to the company, and it was thereupon cancelled.

At the same time that the policy was applied for, an application was submitted for a loan by the company to Giddings of $6,000. In relation to this matter there is some conflict in the evidence, but as the view which we take of the case before us renders it unnecessary to consider that subject, we pass it by without further remark.

The seventh section of the act incorporating the appellee is as follows:——

'Every person who shall become a member of this corporation, by effecting insurance therein, shall, the first time he effects insurance and before he receives his policy, pay the rates that shall be fixed upon and determined by the trustees; and no premium so paid shall ever be withdrawn from said company, except as hereinafter provided, but shall be liable to all the losses and expenses incurred by this company during the continuance of its charter.'

The policy, as made out, was according to the form issued by the company in all cases. Among other things it provided,——

'7th, This policy shall not take effect and become binding on the company until the premium be actually paid, during the lifetime of the person whose life is assured, to the company or to some person authorized to receive it, who shall countersign the policy on receipt of the premium.'

Giddings was taken ill of acute pleurisy on or about the 15th of August, 1872, and died of that disease on the 4th of September following. On the 12th or 13th of November following, the appellants, by their attorney, tendered to Dean, of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • American Life Ins. Co. v. Nabors
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1934
    ...Co., 116 Conn. 526, 165 A. 686; Heiman v. Phœnix Mutual Life Ins. Co., 17 Minn. 153 (Gil. 127), 10 Am. Rep. 154; Giddings v. Insurance Company, 102 U. S. 108, 111, 26 L. Ed. 92; Misselhorn v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n (C. C.) 30 F. 545, 546; Travis v. Nederland Life Ins. Co. (C. C. A.)......
  • Mississippi Ben. Ass'n v. Brooks
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 30, 1939
    ...to the making of their contract, had no existence." Bacon, Life and Acc. Ins. (4 Ed.), section 346, page 706. In Giddings v. Ins. Company, 102 U.S. 108, the party to insured died before delivery of the policy. The court said that "the proposition of the company expired with his life. After ......
  • Sterling v. Head Camp, Pacific Jurisdiction, Woodmen of the World
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • March 30, 1905
    ...the existence of an obligation which could be enforced against the company." Newcomb v. Fund Soc. (Col. App.), 38 P. 61; Giddings v. Ins. Co., 102 U.S. 108, 26 L.Ed. 92. Until the certificate was so signed and delivered, transactions were no more than pending negotiations and proposals towa......
  • Hukill v. Myers et at.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • April 28, 1892
    ...593; High Inj. 615, 698, 701, 715, 718, 722; 5 L. R. A. 731; 8 W. Va. 95; 1 Wall. 61; 60 Pa. St, 452; 13 W. Va. 20, 21; Id. 24; Id. 12; 102 U. S. 108; 2 Sto. Eq. Jur. §§ 1316, 1321; Pom, Eq. Jur. § 453; Tay. Land!. & Ten. § 495; 80 Pa. St. 142; 96 Pa. St. 310; 1 How. 211; 15 Wall. 477; 40 C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT