Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford
Decision Date | 26 October 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 23729.,23729. |
Citation | 858 A.2d 860,85 Conn.App. 663 |
Parties | Gil GILBERT v. BEAVER DAM ASSOCIATION OF STRATFORD, INC., et al. |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Barbara M. Schellenberg, with whom was Jonathan S. Bowman, Bridgeport, for the appellant-cross appellee (plaintiff).
Laurence V. Parnoff, Bridgeport, for the appellees-cross appellants (defendants).
FOTI, SCHALLER and PETERS, Js.
The plaintiff, Gil Gilbert, appeals and the defendants, Beaver Dam Association of Stratford, Inc. (association), and all the owners of property that abuts the Beaver Dam Lake, cross appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a trial to the court. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly held that (1) he could not rely on the Common Interest Ownership Act, General Statutes § 47-200 et seq., (2) the association did not slander the plaintiff's title to his property and (3) the association's bylaws were properly authorized. On cross appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) precluded them from recovering attorney's fees when they had not placed the issue of attorney's fees before the court, (2) held that the statute of frauds negated their right of first refusal to purchase the plaintiff's property and (3) held that the association could not place a lien on the plaintiff's property. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The court found the following facts. "Beaver Dam Lake is a fifty-eight acre lake in Stratford. In the 1930s, the lake and the surrounding area, which forms the watershed of the lake, were owned by The Loch Lenidow Realty Company (Loch Lenidow). That entity sold off some lots around the lake and, in 1944, it deeded to the association the property on which an earthen dam was located and the lake and lake bed below the dam. In this deed, the grantor reserved the right to permit six docks at specified locations on the lake from lots still owned by Loch Lenidow and obligated itself to include in the deeds of its remaining lots provisions that would prevent access by the public and reserve use of the lake to the members of the association. It further obligated itself to sell its remaining lots `subject ... to all reasonable rules and regulations now in effect or such as may be generally imposed from time to time upon all the owners having the use of Beaver Dam Lake, by [the association], its successors or assigns.' This deed stated that the conveyance of the lake and dam to the association were subject to `[g]rants to the use of the waters of Beaver Dam Lake contained in deeds of conveyance' set forth in various conveyances of lots.
These deed restrictions clearly provide that the grantee took the property in question with restrictions and limitations on developing it....
* * *
* * *
"The amended bylaws provided, at article VI, § 4, that `[n]o property abutting on the water of Beaver Dam Lake, whether now owned by a non-member of the Association or formerly owned by any member of the Association, shall be subdivided, built upon or otherwise developed without the prior consent of a three-quarter (3/4) a[sic] majority vote of the members of the Association.'" Although the plaintiff attended several functions open only to members, he did not pay the membership dues bill that was issued on July 1, 1999. "In his pleadings, [however] he asserted that he was not a member of the association and took the position that because he was not a member he was not subject to the association's bylaws and regulations. The association filed a lien against the plaintiff's property for the dues for the 1999-2000 year. The association did not seek to recover dues from the plaintiff for any year other than 1999. The association had begun using such liens to collect unpaid dues in February, 1999.
After the pleadings were closed, the plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment claiming that the association's purported right of first refusal as contained in the association's amended regulations and bylaws was invalid. The court granted the motion, finding that the "regulation that purported to give the association and its various members a right of first refusal in the event that an owner of property around the lake contracted to sell it" was unenforceable for failure to satisfy the statute of frauds because the identity of the holder of the right was not sufficiently stated. After trial, the court found for the defendants on all of the plaintiff's remaining claims except his claim that the defendants improperly had placed a lien on his property. This appeal followed. Additional facts will be set forth as necessary.
The plaintiff claims that the court improperly held that he could not rely on the Common Interest Ownership Act (act) to support his claim that the association was not valid. The plaintiff argues that Practice Book §...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jepsen v. Camassar
...a plaintiff must present evidence of how the clouded title resulted in some pecuniary loss." Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Assn. of Stratford, Inc ., 85 Conn. App. 663, 673, 858 A.2d 860 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 912, 866 A.2d 1283 (2005). Like the plaintiffs in Gilbert , the plaintiffs here ......
-
Chamerda v. Opie, AC 40573
...18, 116 A.3d 814 (2015) ; Fountain Pointe, LLC v. Calpitano , supra, 144 Conn. App. 653–55; Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Association of Stratford, Inc. , 85 Conn. App. 663, 672–73, 858 A.2d 860 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 912, 866 A.2d 1283 (2005).In dicta16 in Bellemare, our Supreme Court ana......
-
In re Gen. Motors LLC
...of injuries," Broughel v. S. New England Tel. Co. , 73 Conn. 614, 48 A. 751, 754 (1901) ; see alsoGilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford Inc. , 85 Conn. App. 663, 674, 858 A.2d 860 (2004) (same). • Delaware:Robinson v. Simpson , 13 Del. 398, 32 A. 287, 287 (Del. Super. Ct. 1889) (holding ......
-
State Of Conn. v. Outing.
...of the rules of practice presents a question of law, over which our review is plenary.” Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Assn. of Stratford, Inc., 85 Conn.App. 663, 671, 858 A.2d 860 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 912, 866 A.2d 1283 (2005). In construing the scope and application of § 42-36, we do no......
-
Chapter 9 - § 9.4 • DELINQUENT ASSESSMENTS
...the association's lien rights and the fact that the assessments were in arrears. See also Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford, Inc., 858 A.2d 860 (Conn. App. Ct. 2004), app. denied, 866 A.2d 1283 (Conn. 2005) (property owner failed to prove association slandered title to his property b......