Giles v. Bd. of Trs.

Decision Date19 May 2022
Docket NumberA-0640-20
PartiesSHARON GILES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, TEACHERS' PENSION AND ANNUITY FUND, Respondent-Respondent.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

Argued on April 25, 2022

On appeal from the Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund, Department of Treasury.

Samuel M. Gaylord argued the cause for appellant (Szaferman, Lakind Blumstein & Blader, PC, attorneys; Samuel M. Gaylord, on the brief).

Jeffrey D. Padgett, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Matthew J. Platkin, Acting Attorney General attorney; Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Jeffrey D. Padgett, on the brief).

Before Judges Mayer and Bishop-Thompson.

PER CURIAM

Petitioner Sharon Giles appeals from an October 6, 2020 final agency decision by the Board of Trustees (Board) of the Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund denying her application for ordinary disability retirement benefits. We remand to the Board for specific findings of facts and conclusions of law concerning Giles's ability to perform duties in the "general area of [her] ordinary employment . . . ." Skulski v. Nolan, 68 N.J. 179, 206 (1975).

We briefly recite the facts relevant to Giles's application for ordinary disability retirement benefits. Giles worked as a public schoolteacher in East Orange for ten years. She taught economics and entrepreneurship classes to students in grades three through five.

On October 27, 2014, Giles fell off a chair while attempting to hang material in her classroom, injuring her back. Giles was treated for her back injuries and never returned to work after the incident.

On February 4, 2015, Giles applied for ordinary disability retirement benefits. On July 1, 2015, she resigned her teaching position. On August 6, 2015, the Board considered Giles's application and denied her request for ordinary disability retirement benefits. The Board concluded Giles was not totally and permanently disabled from performing her regular and assigned duties as a teacher. Giles appealed. On October 7, 2015, the Board referred the matter to the Office of Administrative Law (OAL).

The case was assigned to an administrative law judge (ALJ). The ALJ conducted evidentiary hearings on November 2, 2018 and March 5, 2019. The following individuals testified: Giles her medical expert, Dr. David Weiss; and the Board's medical expert, Dr. Arnold Berman.

Giles testified her condition prevented her from performing the duties identified in the written job description prepared by the East Orange School District (District). According to the District's job description, the general responsibilities for teachers included planning lessons, creating a productive classroom environment, and employing satisfactory educational methods. Giles also described other duties not included in the District's job description that she could no longer perform. Giles testified those additional duties fell under the category in the District's job description entitled "other duties which may be assigned by the administrator." Giles explained her additional duties included supervising in the cafeteria during the morning, overseeing students during lunch recess, and participating in fire and active-shooter drills.

Giles testified she taught a computer lab course located on the second floor of the school. Because there was no elevator in the school, Giles had to climb stairs several times a day to perform her various job assignments. Additionally, she stood five to six hours throughout the school day and engaged in repetitive bending while teaching students.

Dr. Weiss testified on behalf of Giles. His testimony included a review of Giles's medical history, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electromyography (EMG) studies. A physician who worked with Dr. Weiss performed a physical examination of Giles about three years after her 2014 fall. Based on the results of the physical examination and his review of Giles's medical records, Dr. Weiss diagnosed Giles with a post-traumatic strain and sprain of her lumbar spine, herniated disc at L5/S1, and bulging disc at L4/L5. He also found age-related degenerative disc disease in Giles's lumbar spine.

As a result of these findings, Dr. Weiss concluded Giles could not perform her duties as a teacher. According to Dr. Weiss, Giles was unable to perform any of the teaching duties - not only the duties identified in the District's job description but the other duties Giles identified beyond those enumerated in the District's job description.

The Board's expert, Dr. Berman, reached the opposite conclusion, finding Giles was not totally and permanently disabled from the performance of her teaching job. Dr. Berman performed a physical examination of Giles about eight months after her fall. According to Dr. Berman, Giles had a full range of motion and normal reflexes based on his examination. Dr. Berman testified Giles's straight leg testing revealed no radiculopathy despite a radicular finding according to her EMG test.

Dr. Berman testified Giles's low back pain was attributable to age-related degenerative changes in her lumbar spine. In reviewing Giles's January 2015 MRI, Dr. Berman concluded the bulging disc and protrusion on the MRI were not traumatically induced but rather the result of age-related degeneration. Dr. Berman explained he favored results based on "objective tests," which are "totally out of the control of the patient," rather than results based on "subjective complaints," which "are totally under the control of the patient." Dr. Berman opined hands-on testing of a person is more objective and conclusive than an MRI or EMG study. Based on his hands-on testing, Dr. Berman found Giles had long-standing degenerative disc disease in her spine. Although he found age-related degeneration, Dr. Berman concluded Giles was not totally and permanently disabled from working as a teacher and remained capable of performing the duties and functions of her job.

After closing the record, the ALJ rendered an initial decision. In reviewing the testimony and evidence, the ALJ reversed the Board's denial of Giles's application for ordinary retirement benefits. In her July 2, 2020 written decision, the ALJ held "the October 27, 2014, fall resulted in [Giles] injuring her back, which has left her totally and permanently disabled from working as a teacher or in any other capacity." Regarding the experts' testimony, the ALJ concluded Dr. Weiss's testimony was "credible, straightforward, and knowledgeable." She also found Dr. Weiss's testimony and opinions aligned with the medical records and findings provided by Giles's treating physicians. Overall, the ALJ found Dr. Weiss's testimony to be more credible than Dr. Berman's testimony.

Additionally the ALJ "reject[ed] Dr....

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT