Giles v. California, 07–6053.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation128 S.Ct. 976,76 USLW 3364,169 L.Ed.2d 800,552 U.S. 1136,76 USLW 3371
Docket NumberNo. 07–6053.,07–6053.
PartiesDwayne GILES, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.
Decision Date11 January 2008

128 S.Ct. 976
169 L.Ed.2d 800
552 U.S. 1136
76 USLW 3364
76 USLW 3371

Dwayne GILES, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.

No. 07–6053.

Supreme Court of the United States

Jan. 11, 2008.


Case below, 40 Cal.4th 833, 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 152 P.3d 433.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California granted. Brief of petitioner to be filed on or before Wednesday, February 20, 2008. Brief of respondent to be filed on or before Wednesday, March 19, 2008. Reply brief, if any, to be filed in accordance with Rule 25.3 of the Rules of this Court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 practice notes
  • Giles v. California, 07–6053.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 25 de junho de 2008
    ...Supreme Court affirmed on the same ground. 40 Cal.4th 833, 837, 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 152 P.3d 433, 435 (2007). We granted certiorari. 552 U.S. 1136, 128 S.Ct. 976, 169 L.Ed.2d 800 (2008).II The Sixth Amendment provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right .......
  • State v. Bodden, COA07-719.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 20 de maio de 2008
    ...if the wrongdoing is that same conduct for which the defendant is being prosecuted), cert. granted by Giles v. California, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 976, 169 L.Ed.2d 800 However, other jurisdictions have declined to extend the forfeiture exception to dying declarations where the defendant den......
  • Sohail v. State, 01-06-00682-CR.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • 21 de fevereiro de 2008
    ...(same); People v. Giles, 40 Cal.4th 833, 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 152 P.3d 433 (2007), cert. granted, Giles v. California, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 976, 169 L.Ed.2d 800 (2008)). There is a split of authority on this issue. Other states require the State show that a defendant acted with the intent......
  • People v. Banos, B194272.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 19 de outubro de 2009
    ...v. Giles (2007) 40 Cal.4th 833 [55 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 152 P.3d 433], certiorari granted sub nom. Giles v. California (2008) ___ U.S. ___ [169 L.Ed.2d 800, 128 S.Ct. 976] (Giles I). Under that doctrine, a defendant may forfeit the right to confront a witness when he has killed that witness or ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Giles v. California, 07–6053.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 25 de junho de 2008
    ...Supreme Court affirmed on the same ground. 40 Cal.4th 833, 837, 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 152 P.3d 433, 435 (2007). We granted certiorari. 552 U.S. 1136, 128 S.Ct. 976, 169 L.Ed.2d 800 (2008).II The Sixth Amendment provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right .......
  • State v. Bodden, COA07-719.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • 20 de maio de 2008
    ...if the wrongdoing is that same conduct for which the defendant is being prosecuted), cert. granted by Giles v. California, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 976, 169 L.Ed.2d 800 However, other jurisdictions have declined to extend the forfeiture exception to dying declarations where the defendant den......
  • Sohail v. State, 01-06-00682-CR.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas
    • 21 de fevereiro de 2008
    ...(same); People v. Giles, 40 Cal.4th 833, 55 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 152 P.3d 433 (2007), cert. granted, Giles v. California, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 976, 169 L.Ed.2d 800 (2008)). There is a split of authority on this issue. Other states require the State show that a defendant acted with the intent......
  • People v. Banos, B194272.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 19 de outubro de 2009
    ...v. Giles (2007) 40 Cal.4th 833 [55 Cal.Rptr.3d 133, 152 P.3d 433], certiorari granted sub nom. Giles v. California (2008) ___ U.S. ___ [169 L.Ed.2d 800, 128 S.Ct. 976] (Giles I). Under that doctrine, a defendant may forfeit the right to confront a witness when he has killed that witness or ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT