Gill Sav. Ass'n v. Chair King, Inc.
| Decision Date | 17 October 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. C-9598,C-9598 |
| Citation | 797 S.W.2d 31 |
| Parties | GILL SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner and Cross-Respondent, v. CHAIR KING, INC., Respondent and Cross-Petitioner. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Gerald T. Drought, Troy Martin, III, San Antonio, Joanne M. Vorpahl, Robert D. Daniel, Jay N. Gross, Houston, for petitioner and cross-respondent.
Dennis G. Herlong, Houston, for respondent and cross-petitioner.
Chair King filed suit against Gill Savings for wrongful eviction. After a trial to the court Chair King was awarded actual and punitive damages, and attorney's fees for the trial, the appeal, and for the bankruptcy proceedings involved. The court of appeals affirmed the liability but modified the award for attorney's fees. However, the court of appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause, holding the evidence was factually insufficient to support damages. 783 S.W.2d 674. Both parties filed applications for Writ of Error. We disapprove the court of appeals' holding on attorney's fees, modify the remand instructions, and otherwise affirm the judgment remanding the cause to the trial court.
Chair King was awarded attorney's fees based on a finding of fraud arising out of a breach of contract. Attorney's fees are statutorily authorized for breach of contract actions. Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. §§ 38.001-.005 (Vernon's 1986). The court of appeals deleted only the trial court's award of $25,000 for appellate attorney's fees and $7,800 for other attorneys' fees in the bankruptcy proceeding. The court of appeals held there was no evidence to support either award. Consequently, it did not reach points that the evidence was factually insufficient to support those amounts.
Gill Savings' predecessor in interest in the shopping center filed for bankruptcy protection. The relevant contract was a lease between the former owner and Chair King. Gill Savings claimed to succeed to the lessor's rights under the lease. The record does not disclose the full nature of the bankruptcy court proceedings. The attorneys who represented Chair King in the bankruptcy proceedings did not testify. One of Chair King's officers testified that the $7,800 fee bill was paid, and Chair King's trial attorney testified that the bankruptcy attorney fees were reasonable and necessary. We hold there was some evidence to support the award of the $7,800 attorneys' fees. We disapprove the holding of the court of appeals that, as a matter of law, attorney's fees incurred in a related bankruptcy proceeding cannot be awarded in a breach of contract claim.
Chair King's trial attorney testified that his fees through trial were $54,862.50, and were reasonable and necessary. He did not testify as to appellate attorney's fees. Section 38.004 of the attorney's fees statute provides that "[t]he court may take judicial notice of the usual and customary attorney's fees and of the contents of the case file without receiving further evidence in: (1) a proceeding before the court...." Section 38.005 further provides that the chapter on attorney's fees "shall be liberally construed to promote its underlying purposes." The record of the trial court proceedings reflected the complexity of the case. The trial court's own proceedings...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Sterling
...covering all claims. Gill Sav. Ass'n v. Chair King, Inc., 783 S.W.2d 674, 680 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1989), modified, 797 S.W.2d 31 (Tex.1990) (remanded to the trial court for reexamination of attorney's fee award). Following a review of the record, we conclude that the attorney's ......
-
Mbm Financial v. Woodlands Operating Co.
...(Tex. 1995). 28. Mustang Pipeline Co., 134 S.W.3d at 201; Green Int'l, 951 S.W.2d at 390; Beaston, 907 S.W.2d at 437. 29. 797 S.W.2d 31, 31 (Tex. 1990) (per curiam). 30. See 783 S.W.2d 674, 680 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1989), aff'd as modified, 797 S.W.2d 31 (Tex. 31. 212 S.W.3d 299, ......
-
Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. Chapa
...amount covering all claims. Gill Sav. Ass'n v. Chair King, Inc., 783 S.W.2d 674, 680 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1989), modified, 797 S.W.2d 31 (Tex.1990) (remanded to the trial court for reexamination of attorney's fee As the only two authorities cited in this passage suggest, this exce......
-
In re Gulf Exploration, LLC
...v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 842 (Tex. 1992). 39. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.CODE § 38.001-.006. 40. See, e.g., Gill Sav. Ass'n v. Chair King, Inc., 797 S.W.2d 31, 32 (Tex.1990) (holding reasonable fee in contract action included fees incurred in related bankruptcy 41. 262 S.W.3d 337, 352 (Tex......
-
Initial Client Contacts (Plaintiff)
.... at 11, quoting from Gill Sav. Ass’n. v. Chair King, Inc. , 783 S.W.2d 674, 680 (Tex. App.— Houston and [14th Dist.] 1989), modified , 797 S.W.2d 31 (Tex. 1990); see also Flint & Assoc. v. Intercontinental Pipe & Steel, Inc., 739 S.W.2d 622, 624-25 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1987, writ denied). Out......
-
Table of Cases
...2001, no pet.), §2.02.2 Gill Sav. Ass’n v. Chair King, Inc. , 783 S.W.2d 674 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1989), modified , 797 S.W.2d 31 (Tex. 1990), §1.02.15 Gill Sav. Ass’n v. Chair King, Inc. , 797 S.W.2d 31 (Tex. 1990), §1.02.28 GJP, Inc. v. Ghosh , 251 S.W.3d 854 (Tex. App.--Austin......