Gillian v. Day, A-33.

Decision Date11 October 1944
Docket NumberNo. A-33.,A-33.
Citation182 S.W.2d 687
PartiesGILLIAN et ux. v. DAY et al.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Dick Young and P. Harvey, both of Houston, for plaintiff in error.

Albert J. DeLange, Frank A. Stamper, and Robert P. Beman, Jr., all of Houston, for defendant in error.

CRITZ, Justice.

The original opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this proceeding is reported in 181 S.W.2d 327.We refer to that opinion for a sufficient statement of the facts and issues involved.

As is shown by the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, this is an appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court of Harris County, Texas.It was entered in a case pending in that court on application of W. C. Day and Albert Turner.It restrained Richard C. Gillian and wife from prosecuting a certain forcible detainer suit then pending in a...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
2 cases
  • Harris County v. Southern Pac. Transp. Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 30, 1970
    ...any act which will destroy the status quo of the property involved before a full hearing can be had on the merits of the case.' Gillian v. Day, 181 S.W.2d 327 (Tex.Civ.App.1943, writ dism. as moot, 143 Tex. 56, 182 S.W.2d 687); Carter v. City of Houston, 255 S.W.2d 336 (Tex.Civ.App.1953, no......
  • Ex parte Godeke
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1962
    ... ... minor child.' The petition was presented to the Judge of the Domestic Relations Court on the day it was filed, and the Judge thereof, without giving notice to the mother of the child and without ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT