Gillian v. Day, A-33.
Decision Date | 11 October 1944 |
Docket Number | No. A-33.,A-33. |
Citation | 182 S.W.2d 687 |
Parties | GILLIAN et ux. v. DAY et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Dick Young and P. Harvey, both of Houston, for plaintiff in error.
Albert J. DeLange, Frank A. Stamper, and Robert P. Beman, Jr., all of Houston, for defendant in error.
The original opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this proceeding is reported in 181 S.W.2d 327.We refer to that opinion for a sufficient statement of the facts and issues involved.
As is shown by the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, this is an appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court of Harris County, Texas.It was entered in a case pending in that court on application of W. C. Day and Albert Turner.It restrained Richard C. Gillian and wife from prosecuting a certain forcible detainer suit then pending in a...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Harris County v. Southern Pac. Transp. Co.
...any act which will destroy the status quo of the property involved before a full hearing can be had on the merits of the case.' Gillian v. Day, 181 S.W.2d 327 (Tex.Civ.App.1943, writ dism. as moot, 143 Tex. 56, 182 S.W.2d 687); Carter v. City of Houston, 255 S.W.2d 336 (Tex.Civ.App.1953, no......
-
Ex parte Godeke
... ... minor child.' The petition was presented to the Judge of the Domestic Relations Court on the day it was filed, and the Judge thereof, without giving notice to the mother of the child and without ... ...