Gillman v. School Bd. for Holmes Cnty., Fl

Decision Date24 July 2008
Docket NumberNo. 5:08CV34-RS-MD.,5:08CV34-RS-MD.
Citation567 F.Supp.2d 1359
PartiesHeather GILLMAN, through next friend and mother, Ardena GILLMAN, Plaintiff, v. SCHOOL BOARD FOR HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida

Christine P. Sun, ACLU LGBT Project, Nashville, TN, Randall C. Marshall, Robert F. Rosenwald, Jr., ACLU of Florida, Miami, FL, Benjamin James Stevenson, Benjamin Stevenson Esq., Pensacola, FL, Garrard R. Beeney, Maura Eileen Miller, Meg Dana Holzer, Thomas Livezey Laughlin, Vincent Yang Liu, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.

Donald Freeman, Holly Ashby Dincman, Michael Patrick Spellman, Coppins Monroe Adkins Etc. PA, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

RICHARD SMOAK, District Judge.

The question presented is whether a public high school may prohibit students from wearing or displaying t-shirts, arm-bands, stickers, or buttons containing messages and symbols which advocate the acceptance of and fair treatment for persons who are homosexual.

I. Background

Plaintiff Heather Gillman, through her mother, Ardena Gillman, has sued Defendant School Board for Holmes County, Florida, alleging that the School Board has deprived her of her right to free speech and political expression and has engaged in viewpoint-based discrimination, in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Gillman is an eleventh grade student at Ponce de Leon High School, a public school in a rural community in the Florida panhandle serving approximately four hundred students in grades six through twelve. Gillman, who identifies herself as heterosexual, contends that the School Board and the principal of Ponce De Leon, David Davis, unlawfully prohibited her and other students from wearing or displaying t-shirts, armbands, stickers, or buttons containing slogans and symbols which advocate the acceptance of and fair treatment for persons who are homosexual. Banned from the school are rainbows, pink triangles, and the following slogans: "Equal, Not Special Rights," "Gay? Fine By Me," "Gay Pride" or "GP," "I Support My Gay Friends," "I Support Gays," "God Loves Me Just the Way I Am," "I'm Straight, But I Vote Pro-Gay," "I Support Equal Marriage Rights," "Pro-Gay Marriage," "Sexual Orientation is Not a Choice. Religion, However, Is."

II. Facts

This case arose from events involving a homosexual student at Ponce de Leon High School on Friday, September 7, 2007. The twelfth-grade student, Jane Doe, reported to a teacher's aide that she had been taunted by a group of approximately five middle school students because of her sexual orientation. The middle school students allegedly told Jane that "dykes," such as herself, were "nasty," "gross," and "sick." The teacher's aide reported the incident to Principal David Davis.

At the end of the school day on the following Monday, September 10, 2007, Davis called Jane into his office. Davis asked Jane if she had told the teacher's aide that she identified herself as a lesbian. Jane answered, "Yes." Davis then asked, "Are you a lesbian?" Jane again answered, "Yes." Davis counseled Jane that it was not "right" to be homosexual. He then questioned Jane about whether her parents were aware of her sexual orientation. When Jane answered in the negative, Davis asked Jane for her parents' telephone number so that he could call them and inform them of her sexual orientation.1 Davis also instructed Jane to "stay away" from the middle school students or that he would suspend her. Jane left Davis's office in tears.

Jane was not present at school the following day because her sister had surgery. However, Davis's rebuke of Jane on the basis of her sexual orientation became known to the student body. A false rumor circulated that Jane was absent from school because Davis had suspended her for being homosexual. Numerous students expressed their support for Jane by writing "GP" or "Gay Pride" on their bodies, wearing t-shirts with messages supportive of gay rights, yelling "Gay Pride" in the hallways, circulating petitions to demonstrate support for gay rights, and creating signs with messages supporting homosexuals.

On Tuesday, September 11, 2007, a rumor circulated among the student body that Davis had invited an anti-gay preacher from a local church to speak at a mandatory assembly on Wednesday, September 12, 2007. A silent bulletin on the video monitors in each classroom stated that a "morality assembly" would be held at the end of the day on Wednesday.

During lunch, on Wednesday, September 12, 2007, a group of Jane's friends discussed the prospect of peacefully walking out of the assembly in protest. Because the preacher did not discuss issues relating to homosexuality at the assembly and because Davis instructed students that a walk-out would not be tolerated, no students walked out in protest, and the assembly proceeded without incident.

Following the assembly, Davis began investigating what had come to be known as the "Gay Pride" movement at the school. He interviewed approximately thirty students, interrogated them about their sexual orientations, and questioned them about their involvement in the planned walk-out of the assembly and their activities in relation to the movement. During those meetings, Davis instructed students who were homosexual not to discuss their sexual orientations. He also prohibited students from wearing rainbow belts or writing "Gay Pride" or "GP" on their arms and notebooks. He required students to wash "GP" or "Gay Pride" from their arms and hands and lifted the shirts of female students to verify that no such writings were present on their bodies.

One of the students that Davis questioned was Gillman's cousin, who identifies as homosexual. Davis questioned Gillman's cousin about her sexual orientation. Davis stated that being gay was against the Bible and that it was not right. He expressed his hope that Gillman's cousin would not "go down the road" of being a homosexual. Davis then instructed her not to discuss her sexual orientation with any students at the school, not to say "Gay Pride" or write it on her body or school materials, and not to wear her rainbow-colored belt. Davis warned Gillman's cousin that if she violated his instructions, he would suspend her from school.

On Friday, September 21, 2007, and Monday, September 24, 2007, Davis suspended eleven students, including Gillman's cousin, for five school days each as punishment for their involvement in the "Gay Pride" movement. As grounds for the suspensions, Davis explained that the students belonged to a "secret society" or "illegal organization" forbidden by school board policy; had threatened to walk out of an assembly; and had disrupted the school. Davis told the mother of a student whom he had suspended that he could secretly "send her [daughter] off to a private Christian school down in Tallahassee" or to the juvenile detention center and that "if there was a man in your house, your children were in church, you wouldn't be having any of these gay issues."

On Wednesday, September 26, 2007, Gillman wore a rainbow belt and a handmade shirt with the slogan "I Support Gays" to school as an expression of support for her cousin, her acceptance of homosexuals, and her belief that homosexuals should be afforded equal and fair treatment. On Thursday and Friday of that week, Gillman wore a rainbow belt to school to express the same beliefs. Gillman's conduct did not cause any disruption at the school or other negative reactions, and she was not reprimanded or punished.

In light of Davis's prohibition of messages relating to the support and acceptance of homosexuals, Gillman sought clarification from the School Board about its own position on the matter. On November 2, 2007, Gillman and her cousin (who had previously been suspended by Davis), through legal counsel, sent a letter to the attorney for the School Board. The letter requested guidance on which phrases and symbols students could display at school without being disciplined. Specifically, Gillman sought permission from the School Board to display rainbows, pink triangles, and the following slogans: "Equal, Not Special Rights," "Gay? Fine By Me," "Gay Pride" or "GP," "I Support My Gay Friends," "I Support Gays," "God Loves Me Just the Way I Am," "I'm Straight, But I Vote Pro-Gay," "I Support Equal Marriage Rights," "Pro-Gay Marriage," "Sexual Orientation is Not a Choice. Religion, However, Is."

By letter dated November 12, 2007, the School Board responded that none of the phrases, symbols, or images contained in the letter dated November 2, 2007, could be displayed by students at Ponce de Leon High School. The School Board justified its censorship on the ground that the expressions indicated membership In an "illegal organization" prohibited by School Board policy and were disruptive to the educational process. The letter cited students' plan to walk out of the school assembly on September 12, as an example of the disruptive effect of the messages.

In her complaint (Doc. 1), filed January 31, 2008, Gillman contended that she desires to display the symbols and messages contained in the letter dated November 2. She has, however, abstained from doing so based on her fear that she will be disciplined for violating the verbal and written instructions of Davis and the Holmes County School Board prohibiting students from displaying the symbols and messages.

III. Procedure

Named as defendants in the complaint were the School Board for Holmes County, Florida, and David Davis, in his official capacity as principal of Ponce de Leon High School. Gillman alleged that Defendants' conduct in prohibiting students from wearing clothing and displaying writings and symbols which advocate the acceptance of and fair treatment for persons who are homosexual (1) deprived her of her right to free speech and political expression and (2)...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Monegain v. Va. Dep't of Motor Vehicles
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • September 30, 2020
    ...Are Gay, Get Over It’ " was a regulation of "student speech on a matter of political importance"); Gillman v. Sch. Bd. for Holmes Cnty., Fla. , 567 F. Supp. 2d 1359, 1369–75 (N.D. Fla. 2008) (invalidating school ban on wearing or displaying symbols or slogans advancing the fair treatment of......
  • Stepien v. Murphy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • December 7, 2021
    ...out pencils to classmates that read "Jesus loves me this I know for the Bible tells me so"); Gillman ex rel. Gillman v. Sch. Bd. for Holmes Cty., Fla. , 567 F. Supp. 2d 1359, 1362 (N.D. Fla. 2008) (wearing clothes with pro-homosexuality-acceptance messages). Plaintiffs characterize Morgan v......
  • Cyr v. Addison Rutland Supervisory Union
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Vermont
    • September 30, 2014
    ...officer has “effectively delegated the authority to set policy” in that area to the subordinate); Gillman v. Sch. Bd. for Holmes Cnty., 567 F.Supp.2d 1359, 1378 (N.D.Fla.2008) (a school board was liable under § 1983 for a superintendent's restriction on speech when it “wholesale delegated i......
  • Gonzalez v. School Bd. of Okeechobee County
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • July 29, 2008
    ...with other heterosexual students sounds in the political speech addressed in Tinker. See Gillman v. School Bd. for Holmes County, Fla., 567 F.Supp.2d 1359, ___, 2008 WL 2854266, at *9 (N.D.Fla.2008) (applying Tinker to find that expressions of tolerance towards nonheterosexuals in a public ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Challenges facing LGBTQ youth
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXIII-2, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...DRESS CODES AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT ix (Rowman & Littlef‌ield eds., 2014). 263. Id. 264. 393 U.S. 503 (1969). 265. Id. at 514. 266. 567 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (N.D. Fla. 2008). 210 THE GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF GENDER AND THE LAW [Vol. XXIII:179 apparel that advocated acceptance and fair treatment of......
  • Challenges facing LGBTQ youth
    • United States
    • Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law No. XXIV-2, January 2023
    • January 1, 2023
    ...DRESS CODES AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT ix (Rowman & Littlef‌ield eds., 2014). 258. Id. 259. 393 U.S. 503 (1969). 260. Id. at 514. 261. 567 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (N.D. Fla. 2008). 262. Id. at 1375–79, 1362 (citing Tinker , 393 U.S. 503, 506). 263. See Harper v. Poway Unif‌ied Sch. Dist., 445 F.3d 11......
  • PUT MAHANOY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS: A CLOSER LOOK AT WHEN SCHOOLS CAN REGULATE ONLINE STUDENT SPEECH.
    • United States
    • Notre Dame Law Review Vol. 98 No. 2, December 2022
    • December 1, 2022
    ...[perma.cc/Y2PC-QW2T]. (61) See e.g., Gillman v. Sch. Bd., 567 F. Supp. 2d 1359, 1375 (N.D. Fla. 2008) (applying the Tinker substantial disruption test and finding that a ban on gay pride t-shirts at school violated the First Amendment); B.H. v. Easton Area Sch. Dist., 725 F.3d 293, 298 (3d ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT