Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington

CourtWashington Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM.
CitationGilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington, 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886 (Wash. 1933)
Decision Date12 January 1933
Docket Number23238.
PartiesGILMORE v. RED TOP CAB CO. OF WASHINGTON et al.

Department 1.

Appeal from Superior Court, King County; J. T. Ronald, Judge.

Action by William A. Gilmore against the Red Top Cab Company of Washington, and others. From a judgment of dismissal plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Winter S. Martin, Harry S. Redpath, and Leo W. Stewart, all of Seattle, for appellant.

Lyons &amp Orton and Bausman, Oldham, Cohen & Jarvis, of Seattle, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff a minority stockholder of the Red Top Cab Company of Washington, a domestic corporation, brought this action for the appointment of a receiver of that company, and for an accounting by the defendants of the assets alleged to have been wrongfully taken by the defendants from the Red Top Cab Company. The court appointed a receiver for the Red Top Cab Company and, at the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, granted the motions of the defendants for a nonsuit. Plaintiff's motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment of dismissal entered. The plaintiff has appealed.

The errors assigned are the granting of the motions for a nonsuit, denying the motion for a new trial, and entering judgment of dismissal.

So far as material, the trial judge's certificate to the statement of facts reads as follows:

'That the matters and proceedings embodied in the foregoing statement of facts are matters and proceedings occurring in said cause and the same are hereby made a part of the record herein.
'I do further certify that the same contains substantially all material facts, matters and proceedings heretofore occurring in said cause and not already a part of the record therein.
'I do further certify that the foregoing statement of facts contains substantially all of the material evidence and material testimony introduced upon the trial of said cause. * * *'

The statute (Rem. Comp. Stat. § 391) requires the trial judge to certify that the matters and proceedings embodied in the statement of facts are matters and proceedings occurring in the cause. '* * * And that the same are thereby made a part of the record therein; and, when such is the fact, he shall further certify that the same contains all the material facts, matters and proceedings heretofore occurring in the cause and not already a part of the record therein. * * *'

The statement of facts must be...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • AMERICAN FED. OF GOVERNMENT EMP., AFL-CIO v. Rosen
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • August 12, 1976
    ...determined that the word "substantially" is to be equated with the word "about" and "essentially." See Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington (1933), 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886. It is a word employed to modify terms intended to be in close approximation. Janzen v. Phillips (1968), 73 Wash......
  • Baskett v. City of Seattle
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • September 6, 1939
    ... ... by subdivision 2 of Rule IX of the Supreme Court of the State ... of Washington, and that the appellant has not at any time ... served or filed such a statement, and that respondents were ... therefore not advised so ... 372, 165 P. 98; Mauseth v ... Slayden, 104 Wash. 512, 177 P. 319; King v ... Manson, 165 Wash. 90, 4 P.2d 885; Gilmore v. Red Top ... Cab Co., 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886; In re ... [200 Wash. 447] Jordan's ... Estate, 171 Wash 624, 18 P.2d 855; ... ...
  • Loutsis v. Georges
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • February 23, 1940
    ... ... Wash. 691, 89 P. 152; Taylor v. Andres, 83 Wash ... 684, 145 P. 991; Deller v. Long, 96 Wash. 372, 165 ... P. 98; Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co., 171 Wash. 346, 17 ... P.2d 886; Baskett v. Seattle, Wash., 93 P.2d 769 ... Under ... such a ... ...
  • Janzen v. Phillips
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • February 8, 1968
    ...of a contract. The word 'substantially' has been equated with the words 'about' and 'essentially.' Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington, 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886 (1933). 'Nearly' and 'about' are frequently used synonymously. People v. Peltin, 1 Cal.App. 612, 82 P. 980 (1905). These wo......
  • Get Started for Free