Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM. |
| Citation | Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington, 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886 (Wash. 1933) |
| Decision Date | 12 January 1933 |
| Docket Number | 23238. |
| Parties | GILMORE v. RED TOP CAB CO. OF WASHINGTON et al. |
Department 1.
Appeal from Superior Court, King County; J. T. Ronald, Judge.
Action by William A. Gilmore against the Red Top Cab Company of Washington, and others. From a judgment of dismissal plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Winter S. Martin, Harry S. Redpath, and Leo W. Stewart, all of Seattle, for appellant.
Lyons & Orton and Bausman, Oldham, Cohen & Jarvis, of Seattle, for respondents.
Plaintiff a minority stockholder of the Red Top Cab Company of Washington, a domestic corporation, brought this action for the appointment of a receiver of that company, and for an accounting by the defendants of the assets alleged to have been wrongfully taken by the defendants from the Red Top Cab Company. The court appointed a receiver for the Red Top Cab Company and, at the conclusion of the plaintiff's case, granted the motions of the defendants for a nonsuit. Plaintiff's motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment of dismissal entered. The plaintiff has appealed.
The errors assigned are the granting of the motions for a nonsuit, denying the motion for a new trial, and entering judgment of dismissal.
So far as material, the trial judge's certificate to the statement of facts reads as follows:
The statute (Rem. Comp. Stat. § 391) requires the trial judge to certify that the matters and proceedings embodied in the statement of facts are matters and proceedings occurring in the cause. '* * * And that the same are thereby made a part of the record therein; and, when such is the fact, he shall further certify that the same contains all the material facts, matters and proceedings heretofore occurring in the cause and not already a part of the record therein. * * *'
The statement of facts must be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
AMERICAN FED. OF GOVERNMENT EMP., AFL-CIO v. Rosen
...determined that the word "substantially" is to be equated with the word "about" and "essentially." See Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington (1933), 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886. It is a word employed to modify terms intended to be in close approximation. Janzen v. Phillips (1968), 73 Wash......
-
Baskett v. City of Seattle
... ... by subdivision 2 of Rule IX of the Supreme Court of the State ... of Washington, and that the appellant has not at any time ... served or filed such a statement, and that respondents were ... therefore not advised so ... 372, 165 P. 98; Mauseth v ... Slayden, 104 Wash. 512, 177 P. 319; King v ... Manson, 165 Wash. 90, 4 P.2d 885; Gilmore v. Red Top ... Cab Co., 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886; In re ... [200 Wash. 447] Jordan's ... Estate, 171 Wash 624, 18 P.2d 855; ... ...
-
Loutsis v. Georges
... ... Wash. 691, 89 P. 152; Taylor v. Andres, 83 Wash ... 684, 145 P. 991; Deller v. Long, 96 Wash. 372, 165 ... P. 98; Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co., 171 Wash. 346, 17 ... P.2d 886; Baskett v. Seattle, Wash., 93 P.2d 769 ... Under ... such a ... ...
-
Janzen v. Phillips
...of a contract. The word 'substantially' has been equated with the words 'about' and 'essentially.' Gilmore v. Red Top Cab Co. of Washington, 171 Wash. 346, 17 P.2d 886 (1933). 'Nearly' and 'about' are frequently used synonymously. People v. Peltin, 1 Cal.App. 612, 82 P. 980 (1905). These wo......