Gilmore v. U.S. Dept. of Energy, C-95-0285 WHO.

Decision Date13 March 1998
Docket NumberNo. C-95-0285 WHO.,C-95-0285 WHO.
Citation4 F.Supp.2d 912
PartiesJohn GILMORE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of California

Lee Tien, Berkeley, CA, for Plaintiff.

Michael Yamaguchi, U.S. Atty., Mary Beth Uitti, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA, Elizabeth A. Pugh, Daphene R. McFerren, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

ORRICK, District Judge.

In this action brought by John Gilmore ("Gilmore") against the United States Department of Energy ("DOE") under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"), 5 U.S.C. § 552, both parties now move for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, DOE's motion for summary judgment is granted in part, and denied in part. Gilmore's motion for summary judgment is denied in its entirety.

I.

On December 8, 1993, Gilmore filed a FOIA request with DOE, seeking access to all agency records pertaining to the CLERVER conferencing technology. CLERVER was created by Sandia National Laboratories/New Mexico ("SNL"), is owned by Sandia Corporation ("Sandia"), and has been licensed to several private parties, including SunSolutions, Inc. ("Sun"). CLERVER is video conferencing software that allows people in different geographical locations to simultaneously collaborate on complex technical drawings and schematics using their desktop computers. Gilmore requested a copy of CLERVER, as well as all documentation relating to CLERVER, including the source code. He also requested all records that pertain to the rationale for making CLERVER available to Sun, but not to the general public. Gilmore intends to disseminate all of these records on the Internet.

By letter dated May 2, 1994, DOE denied Gilmore's request in its entirety on the ground that (1) the software was not an agency record; (2) the other information about the software was not in DOE's possession; and (3) the information was exempt from disclosure because it was commercially valuable. On May 27, 1994, Gilmore appealed DOE's denial of his request. On June 29, 1994, DOE denied his appeal.

This action was filed on January 24, 1995, and an amended complaint was filed on March 2, 1995. Gilmore seeks:

1. disclosure of CLERVER and related documents;

2. to enjoin DOE from denying FOIA requests for computer software on the ground that software is not an agency record;

3. a declaration that DOE's failure to publicly define the terms "contractor" or "contractor records" renders its "contractor records" regulations null and void as applied to Gilmore and any other person without actual notice of their terms, and requiring DOE to publish definitions of these terms in the Federal Register;

4. a declaration that federal laboratories such as SNL are agencies of DOE subject to the FOIA, and that records of federal laboratories produced under their management and operations contracts with DOE are agency records subject to the FOIA that cannot be withheld under FOIA Exemption 4;

5. a declaration that DOE's pattern and practice of failing to issue a determination of FOIA requests within the ten-day statutory period is unlawful;

6. a declaration that DOE's failure to provide adequate information during the administrative process about the withholding of records is unlawful; and

7. an award of costs and fees.

Gilmore brings these claims under the FOIA, the Administrative Procedures Act, and the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. The parties have now filed cross-motions for summary judgment.

II.
A.

"The basic purpose of the [FOIA] is to ensure an informed citizenry, vital to the functioning of a democratic society, needed to check against corruption and to hold the governors accountable to the governed." NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 242, 98 S.Ct. 2311, 57 L.Ed.2d 159 (1978) (citations omitted). The FOIA was intended to establish a general philosophy of full agency disclosure and to close the loopholes that allowed agencies to deny legitimate information to the public. GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, 445 U.S. 375, 385, 100 S.Ct. 1194, 63 L.Ed.2d 467 (1980). In accordance with those goals, the FOIA provides that "each agency, upon any request for records which (i) reasonably describes such records and (ii) is made in accordance with published rules stating the time, place, fees (if any), and procedures to be followed, shall make the records promptly available to any person." 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(3). Nine specific categories of records are not required to be disclosed. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b). "But unless the requested material falls within one of these nine statutory exemptions, the FOIA requires that records and material in the possession of federal agencies be made available on demand to any member of the general public." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 221, 98 S.Ct. 2311. The only exemption claimed to be relevant here is Exemption 4, the exemption for "trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential." 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4).

The FOIA vests jurisdiction in federal district courts to enjoin an agency from withholding agency records and to order the production of any agency records improperly withheld from the complainant. 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B). Federal jurisdiction is thus dependent upon a showing that an agency has (1) improperly (2) withheld (3) agency records. Kissinger v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 445 U.S. 136, 150, 100 S.Ct. 960, 63 L.Ed.2d 267 (1980). The threshold question in this case is whether the requested documents relating to CLERVER are agency records within the meaning of the FOIA.

Under the FOIA, the term "agency" includes "any executive department, military department, Government corporation, Government controlled corporation, or other establishment in the executive branch of the Government (including the Executive Office of the President), or any independent regulatory agency." 5 U.S.C. § 552(f). Private organizations receiving federal financial assistance grants are not within the FOIA definition of "agency," absent extensive, detailed, and virtually day-to-day supervision. Forsham v. Harris, 445 U.S. 169, 179, 100 S.Ct. 977, 63 L.Ed.2d 293 (1980).

"Records" include "all books, papers, maps, photographs, machine readable materials, or other documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics made or received by an agency of the United States Government under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business." Id. at 183, 100 S.Ct. 977 (applying the definition of a "record" from the Records Disposal Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3301, to the FOIA).

Two requirements must be satisfied for materials to qualify as "agency records." United States Dep't of Justice v. Tax Analysts, 492 U.S. 136, 144, 109 S.Ct. 2841, 106 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989) ("Tax Analysts I"). First, an agency must either create or obtain the materials. Id. Second, the agency must be in control of the requested materials at the time the FOIA request is made. Id. at 145, 109 S.Ct. 2841. "By control we mean that the materials must have come into the agency's possession in the legitimate conduct of its official duties." Id. The FOIA applies only to records that have in fact been obtained, and not to records that merely could have been obtained, by the agency. Id. at 144, 109 S.Ct. 2841. The relevant issue is whether a FOIA agency has created or obtained the material sought, not whether the organization from which the documents originated is itself covered by the FOIA. Id. at 146, 109 S.Ct. 2841.

Records of a nonagency can become agency records by contract. Forsham, 445 U.S. at 181, 100 S.Ct. 977. For instance, "Congress could have provided that the records generated by a federally funded grantee were federal property even though the grantee has not been adopted as a federal entity." Id. at 180, 100 S.Ct. 977. Under this test, it appears that records that are contractually owned by the government are agency records regardless of whether they are physically in the government's possession, because they have been obtained by the government and are within the government's control.

The burden is on the agency to demonstrate that the materials sought are not agency records or have not been improperly withheld. Tax Analysts I, 492 U.S. at 142 n. 3, 109 S.Ct. 2841. Placing the burden of proof upon the agency puts the task of justifying the withholding on the only party able to explain it. Id.

B.
1.

The Court begins by examining who was in control of CLERVER and the related CLERVER records on December 8, 1993, the date of Gilmore's FOIA request. The contracts between DOE and Sandia for the operation of SNL provide that, subject to exceptions not relevant here, all records acquired or generated by Sandia in its performance of the contract are the property of the government. (Index to Exs. ("Index"), Vol. II, Ex. C, app. B, art. B-XXXI at B65; id. Vol. I, Ex. B, ¶ H-18(a) at 16.) The contracts also provide that the government will control the rights to all intellectual property created pursuant to the contracts, but that Sandia can request that it be permitted to retain title if it intends to take reasonable steps to commercialize the intellectual property that it has created. (id. Vol. II, Ex. C, app. D, pt. II, ¶ 3 at D11-12 and ¶ 20 at D25; id. Vol. I, Ex. B, ¶ 63(b)(1)(i) at I-65, and ¶ 63(e) at I-67.) If permission to retain title is granted, the government receives a nonexclusive license to use the intellectual property on behalf of the United States. (Id. Vol. II, Ex. C, app. D, pt. II, ¶ 15 at D23; id., Vol. I, Ex. B, ¶ 63(e)(1)(iii)(C) at I-69.) On July 2, 1993, DOE granted permission for Sandia to assert copyright in the CLERVER software. (Elliott Decl. Ex. E ¶ 12.) Previously, in 1992, the government also had assigned to Sandia the title to a patented invention that is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Aguiar v. Drug Enforcement Admin.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • September 30, 2015
    ...is supports defendant's view that the GPS mapping software utilized by the DEA is not an "agency record." In Gilmore v. Department of Energy, 4 F.Supp.2d 912, 918–19 (N.D.Cal.1998), for example, the court held that video conferencing software created by a private entity and licensed to the ......
  • Status of National Veterans Business Development Corporation
    • United States
    • Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel of the Department of Justice
    • March 19, 2004
    ... ... provided to us ... II ... Under 5 ... FDIC employee "was a civil service employee who could ... not be dismissed except for cause or ... University Group Diabetes Program); Gilmore v. Dep 't ... of Energy, 4 F.Supp.2d 912 (N.D ... ...
  • Reich v. U.S. Dep't of Energy
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • March 17, 2011
    ...managed and 3) the company retained complete autonomy in implementing policies for the company and conducting its business. 4 F.Supp.2d 912, 919–20 (N.D.Cal.1998). In this case, the Court concludes, as a matter of law, that ORNL does not constitute a federal agency for FOIA purposes. In his......
  • Rocky Mountain Wild, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 17-1119
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • January 5, 2018
    ...Wild argues that an agency’s contractual ownership of documents renders them "agency records," citing Gilmore v. U.S. Department of Energy, 4 F.Supp.2d 912 (N.D. Cal. 1998).The Gilmore court based its contractual ownership rule, in part, on the premise that "as a policy matter, the governme......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
  • Preliminary investigation
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Handling Federal Discovery - 2019 Contents
    • August 8, 2019
    ...secrets and commercial/inancial information obtained from a person and privileged or coni-dential. See Gilmore v. United States DOE , 4 F. Supp. 2d 912, 922-24 (N.D. Cal. 1998); Inter Ocean Free Zone v. United States Customs Serv. , 982 F. Supp. 867, 871-72 (S.D. Fla. 1997); Center to Preve......
  • Preliminary investigation
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Handling Federal Discovery - 2021 Contents
    • July 31, 2021
    ...ind them. Similarly, the agency is not required to surrender materials if their use is restricted. See Gilmore v. United States DOE , 4 F. Supp. 2d 912, 918-19 (N.D. Cal. 1998) (videoconferencing software licensed from private corporation). However, the agency must search for the requested ......
  • Preliminary investigation
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Handling Federal Discovery - 2016 Contents
    • August 8, 2016
    ...commercial/financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential. See Gilmore v. United States Dep’t of Energy , 4 F. Supp. 2d 912, 922-24 (N.D. Cal. 1998); Inter Ocean Free Zone, Inc. v. United States Customs Serv. , 982 F. Supp. 867, 871-72 (S.D. Fla. 1997); Center T......
  • Preliminary investigation
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Handling Federal Discovery - 2014 Contents
    • August 5, 2014
    ...commercial/financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential. See Gilmore v. United States Dep’t of Energy , 4 F. Supp. 2d 912, 922-24 (N.D. Cal. 1998); Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Food & Drug Admin. , 997 F. Supp. 56, 61-66 (D.D.C. 1998); Inter Ocean F......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 provisions
  • DC_Register Vol 65, No 53, December 28, 2018 Pages 013881 to 014530
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Register
    • Invalid date
    ...to copyrighted materials would suffer competitive harm if the government disclosed the materials under FOIA. See, e.g., Gilmore v. DOE, 4 F. Supp. 2d 912, 922-23 (N.D. Cal. 1998). Subsequent to your appeal, OTR advised you of the sources from which it obtains training materials. If the mate......
  • DC Register Vol 62, No 53, December 25, 2015 Pages 016235 to 016532
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Register
    • Invalid date
    ...October 9, 2015 Page 5 functions of PSC or the District government, which is the statutory purpose of FOIA. See Gilmore v. DOE, 4 F. Supp. 2d 912, 922-23 (N.D. Cal. 1998) (stating that for public interest to be a countervailing factor it should shed light on an agency’s performance of its F......
  • DC Register Vol 61, No 27, June 27, 2014 Pages 6325 to 6760
    • United States
    • District of Columbia Register
    • Invalid date
    ...unrestricted control of the decisions which it received as a party litigant from the District Courts. In Gilmore v. United States DOE, 4 F. Supp. 2d 912, 915-916 (N.D. Cal. 1998), the requester sought a copy of CLERVER, video conferencing software that allows people in different geographica......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT