Giova v. Rosenberg
Citation | 379 U.S. 18,85 S.Ct. 156,13 L.Ed.2d 90 |
Decision Date | 26 October 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 23,23 |
Parties | Filippo GIOVA v. George K. ROSENBERG, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, Los Angeles |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Fred Okrand, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Philip R. Monahan, for respondent.
On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Upon consideration of the submission of the United States that the judgment should be reversed and cause remanded with directions to entertain the petition for review, and upon examination of the entire record, judgment reversed and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with directions to entertain the petition for review.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carvajal-Munoz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
...or an adjustment of status. See Foti v. INS, 375 U.S. 217, 84 S.Ct. 306, 11 L.Ed.2d 281 (1963); see also Giova v. Rosenberg, 379 U.S. 18, 85 S.Ct. 156, 13 L.Ed.2d 90 (1964) (per curiam). Ancillary determinations made outside the context of a proceeding under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1252(b), however, ......
-
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
...this Court's decisions explicitly holding that a denial of a petition for reopening is reviewable, see Giova v. Rosenberg, 379 U.S. 18, 85 S.Ct. 156, 13 L.Ed.2d 90 (1964); reversing an agency for failing to reopen a matter, see Atchison, T. & S.F. R. Co. v. United States, 284 U.S. 248, 52 S......
-
Bufalino v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
...the deportation proceedings. Such an order comes within 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) as a "final order of deportation," Giova v. Rosenberg, 379 U.S. 18, 85 S.Ct. 156, 13 L.Ed.2d 90 (1964), and since petition for review was timely filed on June 26, 1967, this court has jurisdiction. Petitioner relies......
-
Magana-Pizano v. I.N.S.
...375 U.S. 217, 221, 84 S.Ct. 306, 11 L.Ed.2d 281 (1963) (Court of Appeals review of discretionary relief) and Giova v. Rosenberg, 379 U.S. 18, 85 S.Ct. 156, 13 L.Ed.2d 90 (1964) (Court of Appeals review of motion to reopen), with Cheng Fan Kwok v. INS, 392 U.S. 206, 216, 88 S.Ct. 1970, 20 L.......