Givens v. Van Studdiford

Decision Date31 October 1880
CitationGivens v. Van Studdiford, 72 Mo. 129 (Mo. 1880)
PartiesGIVENS v. VAN STUDDIFORD, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

1.Private Nuisance: DAMAGES.

Where the owner knowingly permits a brothel to be established and maintained in his house, which adjoins a tenement of another, by reason of which the latter's tenants leave, and his property is depreciated in value, the former is liable to the latter for the special damage thereby caused him, over and above the wrong and injury done to the general public.

2.______: MEASURE OF DAMAGES.

In such a case the measure of dam ages is the difference in the selling value of the property and th loss of rent occasioned by such nuisance.

3.______: ______: EVIDENCE OF DAMAGE.

In ascertaining these facts, all circumstances that would show a depreciation in value should be considered and the damage recovered must be the actual depreciation shown to be caused by the existence of the nuisance.

4.______: ______.

Where it is shown that, after defendant's house was occupied as a brothel, other houses of the same character were opened in the same neighborhood, so that the damage caused by others cannot be separated from that caused by defendant, he will be liable for all such damage, if the natural and probable consequence of his illegal act was to cause the injury complained of.a1

Appeal from St. Louis Court of Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

Broadhead, Slayback & Haeussler for appellant.

Wm. G. Rainey for respondent.

HOUGH, J

This was an action to recover damages to certain real property of the plaintiff in the city of St. Louis, alleged to have been...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Payne v. The Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1892
    ... ... City of Hopkins v ... Railroad, 79 Mo. 98. (3) The court erred in refusing to ... give instruction number 14 prayed for by plaintiff ... Givens v. Van Studdiford, 4 Mo.App. 498; s. c., 72 ... Mo. 129. (4) The court erred in refusing to give instruction ... number 15 on the measure of ... ...
  • Givens v. Van Studdiford
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1885
    ...this record were considered by the court of appeals on the first appeal. 4 Mo. App. 498. The opinion then filed was approved by this court. 72 Mo. 129. Questions not then considered are also now presented in argument and in elaborate briefs. 1. It is first insisted that there is no bill of ......
  • Olson v. Cook
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • June 22, 1894
  • Bungenstock v. Nishnabotna Drainage District
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 11, 1901
    ... ... Railroad, 83 Mo. 282. (5) What is done or permitted ... under authority of law is not a nuisance. Payne v ... Railroad, 112 Mo. 61; Givens v. Van Studdiford, ... 72 Mo. 129, 86 Mo. 156; R. S. 1889, secs. 8251 to 8265. (6) ... The defendant, which we might style a quasi public ... ...
  • Get Started for Free