Gladden v. Commissioner of Social Sec.

Decision Date29 February 2008
Docket NumberNo. 06 Civ. 3671 (AJP).,06 Civ. 3671 (AJP).
PartiesHermena GLADDEN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Hermena L. Gladden, Yonkers, NY, pro se.

John E. Gura, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

ANDREW J. PECK, United States Magistrate Judge:

Pro se plaintiff Hermena Gladden brings this action pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying Gladden disability insurance benefits. (Dkt. No. 2: Complaint.) The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). (Dkt. No. 12: Notice of Motion; see also Dkt. No. 8: Answer; Dkt. Nos. 9-10: Admin. Record; Dkt. No. 13: Comm'r Br.) The parties have consented to decision by a Magistrate Judge `pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. No. 22.)

For the, reasons set forth below, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED.

FACTS
Procedural Background

On October 8, 2003, pro se plaintiff Hermena Gladden applied for disability insurance benefits alleging that she had a disability since September 18, 2003. (Dkt. Nos. 9-10: Administrative Record filed by the Commissioner ["R."] at 110-12, 13647; see also Did. No. 2: Compl. ¶ 4.) Gladden claimed that she could not work because of a herniated disc, arthritis, severe asthma and lung damage. (R. 136.) Gladden's application was denied initially (R. 57-61), and Gladden requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") (R. 62-64A). ALJ David B. Daugherty held a hearing on February 10, 2005, at which Gladden and a vocational expert testified. (R. 45-56.) On March 19, 2005, ALJ Daugherty issued his decision, finding that Gladden was not disabled. (R. 80-90.)

Gladden requested review of the ALJ's decision (R. 91-95), and the Appeals Council vacated the ALJ's decision and remanded for further proceedings (R. 96-98).

On December 6, 2005, Gladden testified at a supplemental hearing before ALJ James Reap. (R. 13, 20-44.) On January 27, 2006, ALJ Reap found that Gladden was "not under a disability as defined in the Social Security Act, at any time through the date of this decision." (R. 13-19.) ALJ Reap's decision became the final decision when the Appeals Council denied Gladden's request for review on April 19, 2006. (R. 5-8.)

The issue before the Court is whether the Commissioner's decision that Gladden was not disabled is supported by substantial evidence. The Court finds that it was.

Hearings Before the ALJs And Other Non-Medical Evidence

On February 10, 2005 and December 6, 2005, two hearings were held before ALJs David B. Daugherty and James B. Reap, respectively. (R. 13, 20-56.) Gladden appeared without counsel at both hearings. (R. 22, 47.)

Gladden was born on October 8, 1956, and completed three years of college in 1980. (R. 23, 110, 142.) Gladden worked as a correction officer from 1980 to 1998, when she retired with a pension. (R. 52, 137-38, 147-48, 181, 268.) Gladden initially worked with inmates, but for her last five years worked as a personnel officer. (R. 37, 138, 148.) This work involved lifting files and schedules, but never anything heavier than five to ten pounds. (R. 148.) In a typical day, Gladden sat five to seven hours, stood no more than one hour, and walked up to one and one-quarter hours. (R. 138, 148.)

Gladden worked as a driver, and later as a collector, for a newspaper company from November 1999 to September 18, 2003. (R. 23-24, 52, 137-38, 147, 149.) During this time she also worked as a cashier at various retails stores and as a supermarket baker. (R. 137, 147, 150-52.) Gladden served as a volunteer counselor and teacher at her church since 1979 and continued to do so after September 2003. (R. 34, 55, 147.)

Gladden testified that she was in a car accident on November 20, 2002. (R. 27, 31-32, 47, 52.) She crushed her clavicle and "dislocated" her rotator cuff, requiring two surgeries in February 2003 and July 2004. (R. 24-25, 47.) Gladden attempted to return to work when recovering from the clavicle surgery, but stopped on September 18, 2003 when she was hospitalized for two weeks due to "chronic" or "[b]ronchial" asthma. (R. 27, 47, 52-53, 136-37, 163, 254; see also Compl. ¶¶ 4-5.)

Gladden's Disability Report that she filed in connection with her claim for benefits (R. 136-54) claimed that her disability stemmed from a herniated disc, arthritis, asthma and lung damage.1 (R. 136.) She stated that asthma and "scarring" to the lung caused her difficulty breathing, the most significant reason she could not work. (R. 48, 53, 136, 162-63.) Gladden claimed that she had suffered from arthritis since she was three years old; the arthritis caused her arms and legs to swell in the cold, and made it difficult for her to stand. (R. 41, 51-52, 164.) She also stated that her medications limited her ability to work because they caused dizziness, an inability to concentrate, "nervousness [and a] racy heart," and that smoke, fumes and ink at work caused coughing and wheezing. (R. 30, 32, 40, 48-53, 55, 137, 141, 154, 162; see also R. 254.) Gladden's medications included Prednisone, Xolair, Flovent, Singulair, Xopenex, Advair, Albuterol, Dextra, Metformin and Ferrix. (R. 28-30, 48-50, 64, 94, 141, 179, 220-21, 239-48, 265, 267, 270, 272, 274.)

Gladden stated that she could not lift or catty anything with her left side, or raise her left arm over her head or behind her neck, because of injuries sustained in her 2002 car accident. (R. 25-26, 42, 48, 64A.) This limited Gladden's ability to' lift newspapers at work, although following her second shoulder surgery she could do "little things" that she previously was unable to do. (R. 24-25, 154; see also R. 255-60.) Gladden stated that she could use her right side to lift "maybe two half[] gallons of milk and a juice." (R. 42.) Gladden reported that once every three months she saw her treating physician, Dr. Howard Luks, who prescribed physical therapy, recommended home exercise, and sometimes placed her arm in a sling. (R. 26, 34-35.) With regard to her respiratory condition, Gladden stated in December 2006 that her "breathing and lung[s] [were] not worse but it hasn't gotten any better," but that she had difficulty breathing after walking for ten or fifteen minutes and had difficulty going up and down stairs. (R. 28, 33, 41, 47, 160.) In a written report accompanying her disability claim, however, Gladden stated that she could walk "about 2 miles" before having to stop and rest for three to five minutes.2 (R. 161.) She had no problems sitting. (R. 41.) Gladden stated that she received treatment from pulmonologists every other month following her September 2003 hospitalization and continued taking "extensive medication." (R. 47-48.)

Gladden could perform a variety of limited activities, including five to ten minute walks and household chores like ironing and laundry. (R. 156, 158-60, 165.) She shopped for food every week, attended church and bible studies, watched television, went to the, movies and visited the local library to use a computer. (R. 33, 37-40 159-60, 165.) Friends and family prepared her meals because certain dishes create smoke, which exacerbates Gladden's breathing problems, and because certain cooking, implements are too heavy for her to lift. (R. 156-57, 174.) Friends and family drive Gladden to church or the store, wash her clothes and hair, and help with any household cleaning that may irritate Gladden's lungs, such as sweeping or vacuuming. (R. 158, 165, 174.) Gladden drives alone approximately once a month, and does nothing else alone, except for her daily walks.3 (it 32-34, 160.)

Vocational Expert Testimony

Vocational expert Mr. McNew testified at the February 10, 2005 administrative hearing. (R. 45-47, 53-54.) ALJ Daugherty asked whether there were available jobs for a person who was limited to unskilled jobs that involved only limited lifting, occasional climbing, balancing, stooping, bending, crouching, kneeling and crawling and that were free from smoke or fumes. (R. 53.) McNew responded that Gladden could work at the light level as an office clerk or marker or labeler, and at the sedentary level as a general production inspector or a routing clerk. (R. 54.) McNew opined that if the ALJ fully credited Gladden's testimony on her physical condition, Gladden would not be able to work any of those jobs, nor perform any of the tasks required by Gladden's previous work. (R. 54.)

The Medical Evidence Before the ALJs

The medical evidence before the ALJs consisted of records from Gladden's treating and consultative physicians. (R. 180-275:)

Gladden's Asthma

On September 18, 2003, Gladden sought treatment at Lawrence Hospital Center after waking with "chest and sinus congestion. ... [and] chest tightness and wheezing" one day after receiving her first dose of allergy shots. (R. 184, 200.) Her condition "was exacerbated by ... being exposed to cigarettes in the van which she drove that day." (R. 184, 200.) An emergency room examination revealed "expiratory wheezes and respiratory distress." (R. 184, 200.) Doctors administered "Atrovent and albuterol nebulizer treatments every six hours, Decadron ... intravenous piggyback every 12 hours, Singulair ... and oxygen as needed," and increased Gladden's Decadron treatment the following day. (R. 185, 200.) After four days, Gladden's condition had not improved, and "[p]ulmonary was called in to consult." (R. 185.) Doctors ordered a spirometry on September 24, 2003 and discovered "mild to moderate airway obstruction with evidence of bronchospasm."4 (R. 185; see 187-89.) Doctors adjusted Gladden's medications and she gradually improved. (R. 185.) By September 28, 2003, she "was feeling much better and afebrile," and was no longer coughing or wheezing. (R....

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Brown v. Colvin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • August 14, 2015
    ...impairments acknowledged by the [Commissioner] to be of sufficient severity to preclude gainful employment." Gladden v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 536 F. Supp. 2d 403, 419 (S.D.N.Y. 2008), aff'd 337 F. App'x 136 (2d Cir. 2009) (citing Dixon v. Shalala, 54 F.3d 1019, 1022 (2d Cir. 1995)). Medical ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT