Glaenzer v. Wiederer

Decision Date01 November 1887
PartiesGLAENZER et al. v. WIEDERER et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Eaton & Lewis, for plaintiffs.

Goepel & Raegener, for defendants.

LACOMBE, J.

Complainant, on his application for preliminary injunction, refers to the decision of Judge WHEELER in Hall v. Stern, 15 F. 463, sustaining this patent. Additional evidence, however, which was not before the court in that case, is here presented. If, in view of that new proof, complainant's patent is to be sustained at all, it must be sustained by so narrow a margin as hardly to warrant a decision in his favor in advance of the trial. In view of this condition of affairs, and of the other questions raised on the motion, the application for injunction is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Edison Elec. Light Co. v. Beacon Vacuum Pump & Elec. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • February 18, 1893
    ... ... 181; Machine Co. v. Adams, 3 ... Ban.& A. 96; Spring Co. v. Hall, 37 F. 691; ... [54 F. 680] ... Lockwood v. Faber, 27 F. 63; Glaenzer v ... Wiederer, 33 F. 583; Cary v. Spring Bed. Co., ... 26 F. 38 ... There ... is no denial of infringement in the present case ... ...
  • Earl v. Southern Pac. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • August 17, 1896
    ...17,861; Machine Co. v. Adams, 3 Ban.& A. 96, Fed.Cas.No. 752; Spring Co. v. Hall, 37 F. 691; Lockwood v. Faber, 27 F. 63; Glaenzer v. Wiederer, 33 F. 583; Cary Spring-Bed Co., 26 F. 38.' In the case of Edison Electric Light Co. v. Electric Manuf'g Co., supra, Seaman, J., sitting in the circ......
  • Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co. v. Hackensack Improvement Commission
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • May 20, 1912
    ... ... Cas. No. 17,861); Machine Co. v. adams, 3 Ban ... & A. 96; Spring Co. v. Hall (C.C.) 37 F. 691; ... Lockwood v. Faber (C.C.) 27 F. 63; Glaenzer v ... Wiederer (C.C.) 33 F. 583; Cary v. Spring Bed Co ... (C.C.) 26 F. 38.' ... The ... above rule was followed by the Circuit Court ... ...
  • Bradley v. Eccles
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of New York
    • March 5, 1903
    ... ... The ... following cases would seem to indicate that this restraining ... order ought not to be continued: Glaenzer et al. v ... Wiederer et al. (C. C.) 33 F. 583; Edward Bar Co., ... Limited, v. N. Y. & N. H. A. S. Co. (C. C.) 32 F. 79; ... American Coat Pad ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT