Glaser v. United States

Decision Date18 April 1923
Docket Number3042.
Citation289 F. 255
PartiesGLASER v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

Paul P. Glaser, in pro. per.

Homer Elliott, of Martinsville, Ind., for the United States.

Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

BAKER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant complains of a decree canceling his certificate of citizenship on the ground that it was fraudulently procured.

Error is predicated on the insufficiency of the complaint and the proof, and on the admission of certain items of evidence.

No attack upon the complaint by demurrer or otherwise was made in trial court. Appellant was plainly advised, in our view of the pleading, that cancellation was sought because appellant had deceived the naturalization court with respect to his belief in organized government and his adherence to the principles of the Constitution of the United States. Sections 7 and 27 of the Act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat.c. 3592 (Comp. St. Secs. 4363, 4382).

Subsequent acts and declarations of appellant were properly admitted as tending to disclose his state of mind when he signed his petition for naturalization. On the whole, we regard the evidence as adequate to sustain the finding of the trial court. Compare Luria v. United States, 231 U.S. 9, 34 Sup.Ct. 10, 58 L.Ed. 101; United States v. Aakervik (D.C.) 180 F. 137; United States v. Olsson (D.C.) 196 Fed. 562; United States v. Ness, 230 F. 950, 145 C.C.A. 144, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 41; United States v. Griminger (D.C.) 236 F. 285; United States v. Swelgin (D.C.) 254 F. 884; United States v. Herberger (D.C.) 272 F. 278.

The decree is affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • United States v. Kusche
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • 13 Junio 1944
    ...... country on cousin's passport. (b) Amounts to Fraud Alone:. Albertini 5/28/13 DC MONT 206 F. 133 Falsely stated he was single. Glaser 4/18/23 CCA 7th 289 F. 255 Deceived court with respect to. belief in organized Government. Etheridge 5/3/30 DC OR 41 F.2d 762 Misstated date of entry into. ......
  • United States v. Orth, Civil Action No. 881.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • 4 Septiembre 1943
    ...in seeking citizenship. Luria v. United States, supra; United States v. Kramer, supra; Schurmann v. United States, supra; Glaser v. United States, 7 Cir., 289 F. 255; Turlej v. United States, 8 Cir., 31 F.2d Schurmann v. United States, supra 264 F. 918, 18 A.L.R. 1182, is strikingly like th......
  • United States v. Bregler, Civ. A. No. 3197
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 16 Junio 1944
    ...and to any extent. Lack of attachment to the principles of the United States is grounds for revocation under this law. Glaser v. United States, 7 Cir., 289 F. 255, certiorari denied, 263 U.S. 700, 44 S.Ct. 6, 68 L.Ed. 513; Rowan v. United States, 9 Cir., 18 F.2d 246; United States v. Bergma......
  • United States v. Schlotfeldt
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • 30 Junio 1943
    ...9, 34 S.Ct. 10, 58 L.Ed. 101; United States v. Kramer, 5 Cir., 262 F. 395; Turlej v. United States, 8 Cir., 31 F.2d 696; Glaser v. United States, 7 Cir., 289 F. 255; Schurmann v. United States, 9 Cir., 264 F. 917, 18 A.L.R. 1182; United States v. Wursterbarth, D.C., 249 F. 908; United State......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT