Glaze ex rel. Board of Sup'rs of Harrison County Drainage Dist. v. Shumard
Decision Date | 03 October 1932 |
Citation | 54 S.W.2d 726,227 Mo.App. 434 |
Parties | C. E. GLAZE ET AL. EX REL. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF HARRISON COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, APPELLANTS, v. JAMES W. SHUMARD ET AL., RESPONDENTS |
Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Certiorari denied January 11, 1933.
Appeal from Circuit Court of Harrison County.--Hon. A. G. Knight Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Judgment affirmed.
Randall Wilson for appellants.
George R. Miller, and McKnight & Redman for respondents.
This is a suit, at the relation of the Harrison and Mercer County Drainage District, on the official bond of James W. Shumard Treasurer and Ex-Officio Collector of the delinquent taxes for Harrison County, Missouri, to recover a balance of $ 3,184.88, delinquent taxes due said Drainage District, which said treasurer and ex-officio collector collected, but which was not received in cash by the Secretary and Treasurer of said District for reasons which will hereinafter appear.
A jury was waived and the cause was tried before, and submitted to, the court. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant and his sureties. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The bond on which suit is brought is dated April 5, 1925, and was given by James W. Shumard as principal, with the other defendants as sureties, in the sum of $ 15,000, to the Board of Supervisors of the Harrison and Mercer County Drainage District, conditioned as follows:
The relator Drainage District was organized by the Circuit Court under what is now Article 1, Chapter 64, Revised Statutes Missouri 1929, (Secs. 10743 to 10808, both inclusive.)
At the trial an agreed statement of facts was introduced, establishing the following:
1. That the Drainage District was organized as above stated.
2. That the plaintiffs are members of its Board of Supervisors.
3. That James W. Shumard was, at the general election in November, 1924, elected treasurer and ex-officio collector of Harrison County, Missouri, and, after being duly qualified, discharged his duties as such treasurer and ex-officio collector until the expiration of his term; and at the general election in November, 1928, he was reelected, duly qualified and continued to hold said office to the present time and is now discharging the duties thereof;
4. That, as said treasurer and ex-officio collector, he, with his said sureties, signed, sealed and executed the bond herein sued on;
5. That G. E. Girdner was, at all the times mentioned in the petition, the duly elected, qualified and acting Secretary and Treasurer of the said Harrison and Mercer County Drainage District;
6. That during the month of March, 1927, James W. Shumard collected back taxes belonging to said Drainage District, amounting to $ 10,396.32, and between said date and the date of filing this suit, has paid $ 5,391, and since the filing of this suit has paid $ 1,820.44, (amounting in all to $ 7,211.44), and that of the funds so collected, there remains $ 3,184.88, which it is admitted has been demanded of said defendant Shumard and payment refused.
The answer set up two affirmative defenses:
To these defenses a demurrer was filed charging that they failed "to state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the cause of action alleged."
At the same time plaintiffs filed a motion to strike out these defenses--
(1) Because they do not constitute or plead a defense to, or denial of, the cause of action alleged.
(2) Nor do they confess and avoid the cause of action alleged.
(3) Nor do they purport to plead a counterclaim.
The demurrer and motion to strike out were both overruled and thereupon plaintiffs filed a reply denying generally everything except the facts herein above shown to have been admitted.
After hearing the evidence, the trial court rendered a general judgment for defendants, no declarations of law or findings of fact being asked or given. Hence we have no means of knowing whether the court found for defendants on the first or second grounds of defense set up in the answer.
Over the objections of plaintiffs, defendants introduced evidence showing that on May 25, 1925, the County Court of Harrison County, by an order of record, selected the Bethany Savings Bank as county depositary for the county funds of Harrison County, Missouri, for the ensuing two years, and ordered said bank to give bond as such depositary as provided by law, which it did, and said bond was approved and ordered filed, conditioned as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ray Realty Co. v. Holtzman
... ... itself and interfere with such judgment. Glaze et al., ex ... rel. Board of Superintendents of Harrison County Drainage ... District v. Shumard et al., ... Supervisors of Harrison County Drainage Dist. v. Shumard et ... al., 227 Mo.App. 434, 54 ... ...