Glendenning v. Conservation Com'n of Town of Fairfield

Decision Date23 September 1987
Citation205 Conn. 802,531 A.2d 936
PartiesRuth E. GLENDENNING et al. v. CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF FAIRFIELD et al.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

Albert L. Harlow, Fairfield, in support of the petition.

Allan R. Johnson and Linda M. Guliuzza, Westport, in opposition.

The defendantChristian J. Trefz's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 12 Conn.App. 47, 529 A.2d 727, is dismissed.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Andross v. Town of West Hartford
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • January 29, 2008
    ...upon environmental factors required to be considered by agency under those statutory and regulatory provisions), cert. denied, 205 Conn. 802, 531 A.2d 936 (1987). We note that the United States Supreme Court has recognized such interests as cognizable for standing purposes for some time. Se......
  • Mayer v. Historic Dist. Comm'n of Groton
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 30, 2017
    ...of neighboring landowners significantly depreciates the value of their properties [is] highly speculative' "), cert. dismissed, 205 Conn. 802, 531 A.2d 936 (1987).14 We acknowledge that the plaintiffs' appendix includes architectural drawings of a proposed addition that the applicants filed......
  • Polymer Resources, Ltd. v. Keeney
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • August 3, 1993
    ...Burton v. Dillman, supra, 482; Glendenning v. Conservation Commission, 12 Conn.App. 47, 53-54, 529 A.2d 727, cert. dismissed, 205 Conn. 802, 531 A.2d 936 (1987). Polymer brought an action alleging that the defendant violated its due process and equal protection rights guaranteed by the stat......
  • Litchfield Housing Trust, Inc. v. Inland Wetlands Commission of the Town of Litchfield
    • United States
    • Connecticut Superior Court
    • June 9, 2016
    ... ... conservation concern, and other rare species. She also noted ... that this area ... Glendenning v. Conservation Commission , 12 Conn.App ... 47, 50, 529 A.2d 727, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT