Glenn v. Metlife

Decision Date01 September 2006
Docket NumberNo. 05-3918.,05-3918.
Citation461 F.3d 660
PartiesWanda GLENN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METLIFE (Metropolitan Life Insurance Company) and Long Term Disability Plan for Associates of Sears, Roebuck and Company, Defendants-Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Stanley L. Myers, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. C. Scott Lanz, Manchester, Bennett, Powers & Ullman, Youngstown, Ohio, for Appellee.

ON BRIEF:

Stanley L. Myers, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. C. Scott Lanz, Manchester, Bennett, Powers & Ullman, Youngstown, Ohio, for Appellee.

Before: KEITH, MERRITT, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

DAUGHTREY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which KEITH, J., joined.

MERRITT, J. (p. ___), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the reversal of the judgment below but changing the instructions on remand.

OPINION

MARTHA CRAIG DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, Wanda Glenn, filed this ERISA action against defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., the plan administrator for Sears, Roebuck and Co., after MetLife terminated the long-term disability benefits that Glenn had been receiving as a former Sears employee, on the ground that her condition had improved to the point that she was no longer "totally disabled." The district court upheld MetLife's determination, finding that the decision was not arbitrary and capricious, and granted summary judgment to the defendants. For the reasons set out below, we conclude that the record does not support the conclusion that MetLife's denial of Glenn's claim was the result of a deliberative process or that it was based on substantial evidence. We therefore reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the case for further proceedings.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The plaintiff, Wanda Glenn, worked for Sears, Roebuck from 1986 until April 29, 2000, at which point she took a medical leave of absence and has not since returned to work. Glenn's final position with Sears was as sales manager in the women's department, which entailed a workweek of 40-50 hours per week and the training and direct supervision of 20-30 sales associates. The description of her job, prepared by Sears, indicated that the job required sitting up to 20 percent of the workday, standing for 20-60 percent of the workday, and some climbing, reaching, stooping, and lifting. Glenn was responsible for supervising other employees, ensuring that her department was properly stocked with merchandise, satisfying the needs and demands of customers, and identifying and solving various problems as they arose. She reported to the store's general manager.

Glenn submitted a disability claim under Sears's long-term disability plan on June 20, 2000, attaching a letter from her treating physician, Dr. Rajendera C. Patel, dated April 30, 2000, indicating that Glenn had been diagnosed with "severe dilated cardiomyopathy," a disease of the heart muscle that causes the heart to become enlarged and, for that reason, to pump inadequately. Her symptoms included general fatigue and shortness of breath on exertion. Dr. Patel further stated, "From my standpoint, this patient cannot return to any kind of job that would require any significant physical or psychological stress."

The Sears disability plan for which Glenn applied covered two distinct stages of "total disability." The first provided that a participant was totally disabled when she was "completely and continuously unable to perform each of the material duties of [her] regular job." The second category became relevant after the first 24 months of benefits and required that the participant be "completely and continuously unable to perform the duties of any gainful work or service for which [she is] reasonably qualified taking into consideration [her] training, education, experience, and past earning." (Emphasis added.) Glenn's claim was approved, and she began receiving long-term disability benefits following the completion of the 140-day elimination period mandated in the plan.

Two months later, in August 2000, Glenn filed for Social Security disability benefits at the direction of plan administrators, who steered Glenn to Kennedy & Associates, a law firm specializing in obtaining such benefits. The Social Security Administration initially denied Glenn's claim, but an administrative law judge eventually issued a decision finding that Glenn was totally disabled as of April 30, 2000, and was entitled to benefits retroactive to October 2000. As a result, MetLife demanded reimbursement for its overpayment of benefits, based on the amount of Glenn's newly awarded Social Security benefits, and collected $13,502.50 from her.

On May 20, 2003, MetLife sent a letter advising Glenn that if she wished to continue receiving long-term disability benefits, she was required to demonstrate that she met the second definition for total disability, i.e., that she was "incapable of performing the material duties of any gainful occupation as defined by the plan." The letter further advised that, in making a claim determination, MetLife would review "[Glenn]'s vocational information, medical information and [Glenn]'s specific restrictions and limitations that are supported by objective medical evidence."

Glenn's medical information was provided largely by Dr. Patel, the cardiologist who oversaw Glenn's care both before and during the period relevant to this appeal. The record indicates that Glenn had developed hypertension in the early 1980s and had been treated with anti-hypertension therapy since at least 1985. In 1989, she experienced "sudden cardiac death" but was resuscitated and implanted with a defibrillator system. Diagnosed with left ventricular dysfunction, Glenn was hospitalized twice again in the 1990s, once before and once after she began work at Sears. In 2000, she began experiencing prolonged chest tightness, shortness of breath, "increasing fatigue by the end of the day," and edema in her legs from "prolonged standing at work." Because of her progressive ventricular dysfunction, at one point Dr. Patel referred Glenn to Dr. Carl Leier at Ohio State University Hospital to consider the possibility of a heart transplant. In March 2000, Dr. Patel ordered an angiogram, from which he diagnosed Glenn with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. In a letter dated April 7, 2000, Dr. Patel indicated that his patient's "main problem now is stress at work. She works in a Sears store and does have physical as well as psychological stress. Considering her low ejection fraction, I feel that she may not be able to continue to work in any kind of environment that would cause any significant physical or psychological stress and demands." Glenn took medical leave from Sears at the end of that month.

Glenn underwent significant treatment during the next several months, taking as many as seven or eight prescription medications for her heart condition. Dr. Patel noted that, almost three months after ceasing to work at Sears, Glenn was "doing clinically well." He observed that "some of her improvement is from the reduction of stress and strain of work. She still has good and bad days and in fact there are periods where she feels extremely tired and fatigued and runs out of steam." In November 2000, however, Dr. Patel notified MetLife that Glenn was totally disabled from undertaking any occupation and that he did not expect her to be able to return to work.

In March 2001, Glenn underwent a further evaluation of her cardiomyopathy that found her ejection fraction found to be "mildly reduced" and reported "some improvement in her LV [left ventricular] function." Through a walking regime, Glenn had been able to increase her "exercise tolerance," but Dr. Patel noted that she "still gets fatigued out and short of breath, particularly if she is under any kind of significant psychologic stress." Dr. Patel also reported, "From overall evaluation, Wanda seems to be clinically stable and I have advised her to continue her current regimen including Lasix, potassium, Lanoxim, Norvasc, aspirin, calcium, Normodyne and Diovan." In March 2002, a year later, when Dr. Patel filled out a MetLife long-term benefits evaluation form, he indicated that Glenn could lift and carry up to 20 pounds occasionally, had the ability to perform bilateral repetitive foot and hand movements, and could sit eight hours of the day, stand four, and walk two. He also checked "yes" when asked on the form whether she was "able to work in a sedentary physical exertion level occupation." Although the evaluation form was intended to assess capacity for full-time work, Dr. Patel signed it without indicating whether he was releasing Glenn to return to work or what restrictions might apply if she did go back to work. In a later evaluation, Dr. Patel's answers were consistent with his earlier responses, except that he added, "No emotional stress/No heavy exertion." Dr. Patel filled out that form on June 12, 2002.

However, just six days later, Dr. Patel sent a progress report to Glenn's internist indicating that Glenn "was back in our office earlier than expected," complaining of fatigue, "shortness of breath on moderate exertion," and "significant anxiety . . . regarding the disability and having to return to work." Dr. Patel concluded, "From my standpoint, again, considering her cardiomyopathy, I do not believe she will handle any kind of stress well at her work and she would be better off being on disability" rather than returning to her job. Dr. Patel reiterated his opinion that Glenn should not return to work in a letter dated July 22, 2002:

[Glenn] has dilated cardiomyopathy as well as a history of ventricular tachycardia requiring an implantable defibrillator device. The patient has been on multiple medications for her dilated cardiomyopathy. The patient continues to have significant difficulty with exertional shortness of breath on any kind of moderate...

To continue reading

Request your trial
334 cases
  • McKay v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • March 3, 2009
    ...and costs in the amount of $17, 300.00.6 Dated: July 17, 2008. 1. In making the latter argument, Defendant cites to Glenn v. MetLife, 461 F.3d 660, 674 (6th Cir.2006), aff'd, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 2343, 171 L.Ed.2d 299 (2008), as standing for the proposition that a plan administrator may ......
  • Card v. Principal Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • November 2, 2021
    ...award the "benefits due to him under the terms of his plan[.]" 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) ; see, e.g. , Glenn v. Metro. Life Ins. Co. , 461 F.3d 660, 675 & n.5 (6th Cir. 2006) ; Williams v. Int'l Paper Co. , 227 F.3d 706, 715–16 (6th Cir. 2000).Often times, though, a court will find an admin......
  • Blair v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • June 28, 2013
    ...& Health Ins. Co., 443 Fed.Appx. 529, 533 (11th Cir.2011). Indeed, while the SSA's determination may be relevant, see Glenn v. MetLife, 461 F.3d 660, 667 (6th Cir.2006), aff'd554 U.S. 105, 128 S.Ct. 2343, 171 L.Ed.2d 299 (2008); Wilson v. Walgreen Income Protection Plan for Pharmacists, 942......
  • Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • June 19, 2008
    ...that can avoid the process of judgment.” Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 489, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456. Pp. 2349 – 2352. 461 F.3d 660, affirmed. BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and ALITO, JJ., joined, and in which ROBERTS, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Metlife V. Glenn: Supreme Court Cautions On Conflicted Fiduciaries Deciding Claims
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • June 30, 2008
    ...: 1 554 U.S. ____ (2008). The slip opinion may be viewed on the Supreme Court's website at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/06-923.pdf . All cites to the Court's decision in Glenn are to the slip opinion. 2 The U.S. Department of Labor has issued detailed regulations describing the re......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT