Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. Seb S.A., No. 10–6.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation178 L.Ed.2d 286,562 U.S. 960,131 S.Ct. 458 (Mem)
Decision Date12 October 2010
Parties GLOBAL–TECH APPLIANCES, INC., et al., petitioners, v. SEB S.A.
Docket NumberNo. 10–6.

562 U.S. 960
131 S.Ct.
458 (Mem)
178 L.Ed.2d 286

GLOBAL–TECH APPLIANCES, INC., et al., petitioners,
v.
SEB S.A.

No. 10–6.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 12, 2010.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., No. 10–6.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 31, 2011
    ...the court said, "is not different from actual knowledge, but is a form of actual knowledge." Ibid.We granted certiorari. 562 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 458, 178 L.Ed.2d 286 (2010).IIPentalpha argues that active inducement liability under § 271(b) requires more than deliberate indifference to a 56......
  • Arris Group Inc. v. British Telecommunications Plc, No. 2010–1292.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • May 19, 2011
    ...the scope of the specific intent requirement for induced infringement in Global–Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 458, 178 L.Ed.2d 286 (2010) (cert. granted). Because we conclude there is a sufficient controversy regarding contributory infringement, we need not add......
2 cases
  • Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., No. 10–6.
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 31, 2011
    ...the court said, "is not different from actual knowledge, but is a form of actual knowledge." Ibid.We granted certiorari. 562 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 458, 178 L.Ed.2d 286 (2010).IIPentalpha argues that active inducement liability under § 271(b) requires more than deliberate indifference to a 56......
  • Arris Group Inc. v. British Telecommunications Plc, No. 2010–1292.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • May 19, 2011
    ...the scope of the specific intent requirement for induced infringement in Global–Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A., ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 458, 178 L.Ed.2d 286 (2010) (cert. granted). Because we conclude there is a sufficient controversy regarding contributory infringement, we need not add......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT