Gloubitz v. Smeed Brothers
Decision Date | 18 February 1933 |
Docket Number | 5946 |
Parties | SOPHIE GLOUBITZ, Respondent, v. SMEED BROTHERS and STATE INSURANCE FUND, Appellants |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
APPEAL AND ERROR-CERTIFICATE TO TRANSCRIPT-MOTION TO DISMISS.
On motion to dismiss appeal for failure of certificate to identify papers in transcript, appellant should be allowed to file supplemental certificate (I. C. A., secs. 11-213, 11-216).
APPEAL from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, for Canyon County. Hon. John C. Rice, Judge.
Motion to dismiss appeal. Denied.
Motion for leave to file the supplemental certificate granted and the motion to dismiss the appeal denied.
Leslie J. Aker, for Appellants.
This court has permitted in other cases a corrected certificate to the transcript, offered at the hearing on a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack thereof, to be filed, and denied the motion to dismiss. (Barrow v. B. R. Lewis Lbr. Co., 14 Idaho 698, 95 P. 682; Smith v. Intermountain Auto Co., 25 Idaho 212, 136 P. 1125.)
Carl A Burke, for Respondent.
This court has uniformly held that a failure to properly certify that the transcript contains all papers and files before the trial judge and used by him in his consideration of the case constitutes grounds for dismissal of the appeal.
In Walsh v. Niess, 30 Idaho 325, 164 P. 528, the court dismissed an appeal from an order dissolving an injunction. Following is a quotation from the opinion of the court:
The recent case of Farm Credit Corp. v. Mulliner, 48 Idaho 306, 281 P. 1113, is very much in point, because it involves the question of an appeal from a judgment of the district court on appeal from the probate court.
Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript does not contain a certificate to the effect that the contents thereof constitute all the records, papers and files used or considered by the trial judge at the hearing of the case, which was an appeal from the Industrial Accident Board and relies, among other authorities, on Farm Credit Corp v. Mulliner, 48 Idaho 306, 281 P. 1113.
Idaho Code Annotated, secs. 11-213 and 11-216, are as follows:
11-213. "On appeal from a judgment rendered on an appeal, or from an order, except an order granting or refusing a new trial, the appellant must furnish the court with a copy of the notice of appeal, of the judgment or order appealed from, and of papers used on the hearing in the court below."
11-216. "The copies provided for in sections . . . . 11-213 . . must be certified to be correct by the clerk or the attorneys, and must be accompanied with a certificate of the clerk or attorneys, that an undertaking on appeal in due form has been properly filed or a stipulation of the parties...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Owen v. Taylor
... ... whatever ... Appellant ... relies upon Gloubitz v. Smeed Brothers , 52 Idaho ... 725, 727, 20 P.2d 198, where this court held: ... ...
-
Julien v. Barker
...counsel for the respondent, and no motion was made for leave to amend or supply a proper certificate. In Gloubitz v. Smeed Bros., 52 Idaho 725, at page 727, 20 P.2d 198, at page 199, the court 'Such certificate is not jurisdictional, and the failure to include it in the transcript may be co......
-
Eichner v. Meyer
... ... made to amend the certificate by diminution of the record in ... contemplation of Gloubitz v. Smeed Brothers, 52 ... Idaho 725, 20 P.2d 198, or otherwise. This court has ... uniformly held ... ...
-
Peterson v. Idaho First Nat. Bank
...appearing, is sufficient. Julien v. Barker, 75 Idaho 413, 272 P.2d 718; Owen v. Taylor, 62 Idaho 408, 114 P.2d 258; Gloubitz v. Smeed Bros., 52 Idaho 725, 20 P.2d 198. May 18, 1961, plaintiff filed a reply to defendant's motion for dismissal of the appeal. Prior to this filing plaintiff had......