Goggin v. Dudley, 11745.
| Decision Date | 30 March 1948 |
| Docket Number | No. 11745.,11745. |
| Citation | 166 F.2d 1023 |
| Parties | George T. GOGGIN, Trustee of Estate of David Ciphers Dudley, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. David Ciphers DUDLEY, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Frank C. Weller and Thomas S. Tobin, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Cobb & Utley, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, BONE, and ORR, Circuit Judges.
On the grounds and for the reasons stated in its opinion (72 F.Supp. 943), the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
In re Stern
...is not fraudulent per se." Id. at 989 (citing In re Dudley, 72 F.Supp. 943, 945-947 (D.Cal.1947), aff'd per curiam, Goggin v. Dudley, 166 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir.1948); Love v. Menick, 341 F.2d 680, 682-683 (9th The actual holding in Wudrick reads as follows: Since no more is shown in either cas......
-
In re White
...of these conclusions of law. The leading case in this substantive area is In re Dudley, D.C., 72 F.Supp. 943, aff'd sub nom. Goggin v. Dudley, 9 Cir., 166 F.2d 1023. That case set forth the proposition that an investment by a heavily insolvent debtor in exempt building and loan association ......
-
In re Crater
...money borrowed against unencumbered vehicles and placed into a credit union where it was exempt under California law); Goggin v. Dudley, 166 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir.1948), aff'g 72 F.Supp. 943 (S.D.Cal.1947)(upholding exemption for $1,000 of exempt Building and Loan Association stock purchased o......
-
In re Stern
...is not fraudulent per se." Id. at 989 (citing In re Dudley, 72 F.Supp. 943, 945-947 (D.Cal.1947), aff'd per curiam, Goggin v. Dudley, 166 F.2d 1023 (9th Cir.1948); Love v. Menick, 341 F.2d 680, 682-683 (9th Cir.1965)). The actual holding in Wudrick reads as follows: Since no more is shown i......
Request a trial to view additional results