Goldberg v. Erich
Decision Date | 18 January 1923 |
Docket Number | 124. |
Parties | GOLDBERG v. ERICH ET AL. |
Court | Maryland Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City; Chas. F. Stein Judge.
"To be officially reported."
Suit for specific performance by Louise Erich and another against Bernard Goldberg. Decree for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Argued before BOYD, C.J., and BRISCOE, THOMAS, PATTISON, URNER ADKINS, and OFFUTT, JJ.
Joseph S. Goldsmith, of Baltimore, for appellant.
Harry N. Baetjer, of Baltimore (Venable, Baetjer & Howard, and Joseph France, all of Baltimore, on the brief), for appellees.
The only question on this appeal is whether the limitation in remainder in a deed from Dr. Augustus F. Erich and Annie Erich, his wife, of Baltimore city, to I. George Baetjer trustee, dated February 18, 1881, and duly recorded, is void as violating the rule against perpetuities.
Certain property described in that deed was sold by appellees, life beneficiaries under said trust deed and heirs of Dr. Erich to appellant, and a contract of sale was executed by them. On application by appellant to the Maryland Title & Guarantee Company for an insured title, that company refused to guarantee it, although its chief examiner expressed the opinion that title was in appellees, but did not advise acceptance of such title because he thought the deed of trust constituted at least a cloud on the title.
In these circumstances a bill for specific performance was filed by appellees, and in due course specific performance was decreed. From that decree this appeal was taken. The habendum in the deed of trust above mentioned is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ryan v. Ward
... ... of the time 'when the deed became operative.' ... Bowerman v. Taylor, 126 Md. 203 at page 212, 94 A ... 652, 654; Goldberg v. Erich, 142 Md. 544, at page ... 548, 121 A. 365; Hawkins v. Ghent, 154 Md. 261, at ... page 265, 140 A. 212; Miller on Construction of Wills, ... ...
-
Hassell v. Sims
...testator for the benefit of his great-grandchildren is void, as being in violation of the rule against perpetuities." In Goldberg v. Erich, 142 Md. 544, 121 A. 365, provisions of the deed are quite similar to those in the deed here involved. In that case certain property was conveyed by the......