Goldberg v. Soifer
| Decision Date | 06 May 1968 |
| Citation | 30 A.D.2d 533,291 N.Y.S.2d 171 |
| Parties | Dorothy GOLDBERG et al., Respondents, v. Frank SOIFER et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Before CHRIST, Acting P.J., and BRENNAN, RABIN, BENJAMIN and MUNDER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services, etc., which was automatically dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated September 28, 1967, which granted plaintiffs' motion to open their default, vacate the dismissal and restore the action to the trial calendar.
Order reversed, without costs, and motion denied.
In our opinion, plaintiffs failed to make the requisite showing of facts sufficient to excuse their delay in prosecution and failed to establish that they have a meritorious cause of action (Renne v. Roven, 29 A.D.2d 866, 288 N.Y.S.2d 415 (dec. March 4, 1968); Boyle v. Krebs & Schulz Motors, 18 A.D.2d 1010, 1011, 239 N.Y.S.2d 143, 145).
The cause appeared on the day calendar on May 2, 1966 and was marked attorney attributes the default and delay to inadvertence and confusion between the attorney of record and the trial attorney. Such excuses, characterized as 'Law Office Failures' (Sortino v. Fisher, 20 A.D.2d 25, 29, 245 N.Y.S.2d 186, 192), have been weighed in the balance many times and found wanting (e.g., Renne v. Roven, supra; Marzian v. D'Oench, 28 A.D.2d 723, 281 N.Y.S.2d 520; Evans v. Kompinski, 28 A.D.2d 635, 280 N.Y.S.2d 596; Greenwald v. Zyvith, 23 A.D.2d 201, 203, 259 N.Y.S.2d 387, 389; Berger v. Colrick, 20 A.D.2d 639; Gurrieri v. Spohrer, 20 A.D.2d 914, 249 N.Y.S.2d 501; Nystrom v. National Airlines, 20 A.D.2d 665, 246 N.Y.S.2d 882).
Furthermore, there is no affidavit of merits by plaintiffs. The recital by trial counsel of the testimony of the female plaintiff taken in an examination before trial is not sufficient to permit a determination to be made as to whether evidence exists to support the allegations of the complaint. Therefore, plaintiffs' showing of merit is also inadequate (cf. Keating v. Smith, 20 A.D.2d 141, 142, 245 N.Y.S.2d 909; Sortino v. Fisher, supra, pp. 31--32, 245 N.Y.S.2d pp. 194--195; see Uvick v. Sealand, 27 A.D.2d 956, 282 N.Y.S.2d 189).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rodriguez v. Middle Atlantic Auto Leasing, Inc.
...N.Y.S.2d 30 [1st Dept, 1972] ), or whether evidence exists to support the allegations of the complaint. See Goldberg v. Soifer, 30 A.D.2d 533, 534, 291 N.Y.S.2d 171 (2d Dept, 1968). No explanation has been given as to why an affidavit from one of the alleged witnesses to the accident was no......
-
McNamara v. Hutchinson
...be frustrated and defeated if dismissals were vacated upon a mere showing of inadvertence and unsupported mistake. (Goldberg v. Soifer, 30 A.D.2d 533, 291 N.Y.S.2d 171; Pisaturo v. McCloud, 26 A.D.2d 610, 271 N.Y.S.2d The order should be reversed, on the law and the facts, and plaintiffs' m......
-
Frangione v. Cordasco
...20 A.D.2d 25, 29, 245 N.Y.S.2d 186, 192) 'have been weighed in the balance many times and found wanting.' (Goldberg v. Soifer, 30 A.D.2d 533, 534, 291 N.Y.S.2d 171, 172.) The excuse of illness of the attorney of record is also inadequate when it does not appear that the condition existed th......
-
Floria v. Cook
...delay in serving the complaint (see Lee v. City School Dist. of City of White Plains, 57 A.D.2d 566, 393 N.Y.S.2d 583; Goldberg v. Soifer, 30 A.D.2d 533, 291 N.Y.S.2d 171). Furthermore, we note that the hospital records indicate that the female plaintiff's operation took place in 1966, at w......