Golden Ins. Co. v. Ingrid House, Inc.
Decision Date | 10 May 2021 |
Docket Number | 20-cv-1163 (LJL) |
Parties | GOLDEN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INGRID HOUSE, INC., Arch Specialty Insurance Company, and the State Insurance Fund, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York |
Timothy Wayne Stalker, Stalker PC, Landenberg, PA, Matthew Ellis Rayburn, George J. Vogrin, Jr., Vogrin & Frimet, LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff.
Neal Fellenbaum, Zegen & Fellenbaum, New York, NY, for Defendant Ingrid House, Inc.
Plaintiff Golden Insurance Company ("Golden Insurance") and Defendant Ingrid House LLC ("Ingrid House") cross-move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise indicated.
Golden Insurance is a risk retention group and liability insurance company incorporated in Nevada and with its principal place of business in Scottsdale, Arizona. Dkt. No. 65 ¶ 1. Ingrid House is a New York limited liability company with its principal place of business in New York. Id. ¶ 2. From prior to December 17, 2015 to the present, Ingrid House has been the owner of premises located at 356 East 8th Street, New York, New York (the "Subject Premises"). Id. ¶ 3.
Ingrid House was engaged in a construction project (the "Project") on the Subject Premises, to expand the Subject Premises from four stories to six. Id. ¶ 18. On or about November 25, 2014, Ingrid House entered into a contract (the "Contract") with Elite Builders Corp. ("Elite Builders") to complete the Project. Id. ¶ 17. Around the same time, NYJC Construction Corp. ("NYJC") and Elite Builders entered into a Subcontract Agreement (the "Subcontract") for the construction at the Subject Premises. Id. ¶ 19.
On or about December 17, 2015, Golden Insurance issued Policy GIC1301201 (the "Golden Policy") to Ingrid House to insure the Project. Id. ¶ 4. The Golden Policy provided that: "This insurance applies to ‘bodily injury’ and ‘property damage’ only with regards to the project at 356 E. 8th Street, New York, NY 10009." Id. ¶ 5.
The "Coverages" portion of the Golden Policy provides as follows:
The Golden Policy additionally included two exclusions relevant to this case. Endorsement #30 states:
Luis Alberto Pomboza Chicaiza ("Chicaiza") was an employee of NYJC. Id. ¶ 23. On or about December 24, 2015, Chicaiza was working at the construction site at the Subject Premises. Id. ¶ 22. While Chicaiza was working at the job site, as the result of a wall collapse, he fell from the fourth floor of the Subject Premises. Id. ¶¶ 24-25.
On January 20, 2016, the law firm of Ginsburg & Misk, LLP, prior counsel for Ingrid House, notified Golden Insurance and American Claims Management, Inc. ("ACM"), the claim administrator for Golden Insurance, of the December 24, 2015 accident. Id. ¶ 26; Ex. I. The letter informed Golden Insurance and ACM of the claim, stating that "[d]uring construction at the [Subject Premises] an employee of one of the subcontractors ... was unfortunately killed as a result of an accident" and asked Golden to inform the insured "of their acceptance of the tender of this claim at [its] earliest convenience." Dkt. No. 65, Ex I at 2. The letter attached a demand letter from Chicaiza's estate with the request that the insurance carrier be put on notice of the accident at the construction site. Id. at 3-4.
By letter of March 4, 2016, the law firm of Smith Mazure, Golden Insurance's counsel, responded to Ingrid House's claim. Id. ¶ 27; Ex. J. Its letter invoked Endorsement #30 and stated Id. at 3. The letter also invoked Endorsement #10 and stated that it was counsel's "understanding that this incident may have been caused by a full or partial building collapse" and to the extent that such endorsement applied, Golden Insurance would not provide coverage, a defense or indemnity. Id. at 4. The March 4, 2016 letter stated "Golden Insurance hereby denies coverage, defense and indemnity and any benefit under the policy to Ingrid Home, LLC [sic] ..." Id. at 5. The March 4, 2016 letter further provided: . Dkt. No. 65 ¶ 28; Ex. J at 3.
On or about December 21, 2017, Francisco Pomboza and Adam Stein, as co-administrators of Chicaiza's estate, filed an action (the "Underlying Matter") against NYJC, Elite Builders, Ingrid House and H&R Estate Realty Corp. for the injuries and ultimate death of Mr. Chicaiza in the Supreme Court of New York, Kings County, bearing index number 524610/2017 (the "Underlying Complaint"). Id. ¶ 29 (See Exhibit "K", Underlying Complaint). The Underlying Complaint alleged that Chicaiza "was caused to fall down an elevator and/or stairway shaft as a result of a wall collapsing and sustained severe and permanent injuries, including among other things, blunt force trauma and his wrongful death." Dkt. No. 65, Ex. K ¶ 51.
On January 24, 2018, Smith Mazure responded on behalf of Golden Insurance by sending a "reservation of rights/partial disclaimer" letter to Ingrid House ("January 24, 2018 Letter"). Dkt. No. 65-13. The letter "acknowledge[d] an obligation" to Ingrid House, but stated that "said defense will be subject to reservation of rights/partial disclaimer in relation to indemnity." Id. at 3. The January 24, 2018 Letter noted Endorsement #30 and that "[t]he work involved included the exterior of the building and it is known the building was over three stories in height," but added "it is unknown at this time whether the bodily injury set forth arose out of your work on the exterior of the building." Id. The January 24, 2018 Letter further stated, "[t]o the extent it is determined that the above-referenced exclusion is applicable in this matter, Golden reserves its right to deny coverage, deny a defense, and provide no indemnification or benefit under the Policy Ingrid Home, LLC [sic] nor to any other individual or entity in reference to this matter." Id. The ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- United States v. Parlato
-
The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Ctr. v. Arrowood Indem. Co.
...Underlying Actions, many of which Arrowood agreed to defend with a reservation of rights. See Golden Ins. Co. v. Ingrid House, Inc., 538 F.Supp.3d 293, 308 (S.D.N.Y. 2021) (“An insurer can both disclaim coverage and provide a defense pursuant to a reservation of rights.”). Other Underlying ......
-
Erie Ins. Co. v. McKay
...Co., 538 F.Supp.3d at 302. However, sometimes that totality is clear enough that an insurer's delay can be established as a matter of law. Id. In particular, a delay of at least two months with “absolutely no explanation” typically runs afoul of the obligation to timely disclaim coverage. I......
-
Erie Ins. Co. v. McKay
...Co., 538 F.Supp.3d at 302. However, sometimes that totality is clear enough that an insurer's delay can be established as a matter of law. Id. In particular, a delay of at least two months with “absolutely no explanation” typically runs afoul of the obligation to timely disclaim coverage. I......