Goldman v. Hoehn
| Decision Date | 06 November 1933 |
| Citation | 64 S.W.2d 733,228 Mo.App. 202 |
| Parties | SADIE GOLDMAN, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES H. HOEHN, RESPONDENT |
| Court | Kansas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Buchanan County.--Hon. J. V. Gaddy, Judge.
Appeal dismissed.
Ardey Gabbert and Emmett J. Crouse for appellant.
Silverman & Strop for respondent.
Plaintiff, on August 2, 1933, brought this action in the Circuit Court of Buchanan County seeking to restrain the foreclosure of a deed of trust. On the day the petition was filed the plaintiff presented it to the Circuit Court of Buchanan County and asked that temporary restraining order be issued. The court, upon considering the petition, refused to grant temporary writ of injunction. Thereupon plaintiff filed motion for new trial, which was overruled. On the same day plaintiff sought and was granted an appeal to this court.
In the view we take of the case it is unnecessary to state the allegations of plaintiff's petition for the reason that we are without jurisdiction to review the action of the court in refusing to issue temporary restraining order.
It has been said many times that the right of appeal is purely statutory, and that no appeal lies in the absence of a statute allowing it. [Segall v. Garlichs, 313 Mo. 406, 281 S.W. 693; DeJarnett v. Tickameyer, 40 S.W.2d 686.]
The action of the court in refusing to issue temporary restraining order was not a final judgment, and an appeal therefrom will not lie. [Kansas City Cable Railway Company v. State of Kansas, 29 Mo.App. 89, 95; Harrison v. Rush, 15 Mo. 175.]
The appeal is dismissed. Reynolds, C., concurs.
PER CURIAM:--The foregoing opinion of CAMPBELL, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The appeal is dismissed. All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Koch v. Meacham
...decree in an action to construe a will. Sec. 1018, R. S. 1929; Pence v. K. C. Laundry, 332 Mo. 930, 59 S.W.2d 633; Goldman v. Hoehn, 228 Mo.App. 202, 64 S.W.2d 733. (3) The controlling rule in the construction of wills is give effect to the intention of the testator. Grace v. Perry, 197 Mo.......
-
McClain v. Kansas City Bridge Co.
... ... True, it is well settled that appeals ... are purely statutory, and no appeal lies in the absence of a ... statute allowing it. Goldman v. Hoehn, 228 Mo.App ... 202, 64 S.W.2d 733. l. c. 734, citing Segall v ... Carlichs, 313 Mo. 406, 281 S.W. 693 ... But it ... ...
-
Phillips v. Missouri Dept. of Social Services Child Support Enforcement Div., 68118
...above and for this further reason that refusal to issue a temporary restraining order is not an appealable order. Goldman v. Hoehn, 228 Mo.App. 202, 64 S.W.2d 733, 734 (1933). ...
- Kingsland v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co.