Goldstein v. Cox
| Decision Date | 01 October 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 825,825 |
| Citation | 389 U.S. 581,19 L.Ed.2d 781,88 S.Ct. 694 |
| Parties | Anghel GOLDSTEIN, aka Pietraru, et al. v. Joseph A. COX et al., Surrogates of the County of New York, et al |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
John R. Vintilla, Emauel Eschwege and Novak N. Marku, for petitioners.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, and Daniel M. Cohen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429, 88 S.Ct. 664, 19 L.Ed.2d 683, decided this date.
To continue reading
Request your trial
8 cases
-
Kish's Estate, In re
...was handed down, the court summarily vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Goldstein v. Cox, 389 U.S. 581, 88 S.Ct. 694, 19 L.Ed.2d 781, remanding the case for further consideration in the light of Zschernig. Goldstein was a federal court action to declare t......
- Goldstein v. Cox
-
Bjarsch v. DiFalco
...intrusion into the exclusively federal, foreign affairs domain are not insubstantial. The Supreme Court, in Goldstein v. Cox, 389 U.S. 581, 88 S.Ct. 694, 19 L.Ed.2d 781 (1968) thought the claim that § 2218(2) and (3) were unconstitutional on these grounds sufficiently substantial to warrant......
-
Gorun v. Fall, 1623.
...that this section is unconstitutional, citing Zschernig v. Miller, 389 U.S. 429, 88 S.Ct. 664, 19 L.Ed.2d 683, and Goldstein v. Cox, 389 U.S. 581, 88 S.Ct. 694, 19 L.Ed.2d 781. Plaintiffs' motion for a summary judgment is denied and defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the proceedi......
Request a trial to view additional results