Goll v. United States
Decision Date | 02 January 1907 |
Docket Number | 1,295. |
Citation | 151 F. 412 |
Parties | GOLL v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
The plaintiff in error was convicted of several offenses, charged under section 5209 of the Revised Statutes (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497), in 19 several counts of the indictment, and was sentenced thereupon to an imprisonment for 10 years, such sentence and judgment to 'be concurrent, and not cumulative.' Reversal of the judgment is sought upon numerous assignments of error, many of which are plainly without merit and are not referred to in the brief or argument at the bar. The assignments which appear to be relied upon are sufficiently mentioned and discussed in the opinion.
The indictment as filed consisted of a number of counts which were nolled. Several counts charging embezzlement and several for misapplication of bank funds were in the case as submitted to the jury, but were excluded from the verdict, so that acquittal resulted thereunder. Of the 19 counts upon which the verdict found the accused guilty, each charged an offense committed as 'cashier, assistant cashier and clerk' of a national banking association, known as the 'First National Bank of Milwaukee,' respecting the funds or credits of such bank. Four of these counts (3, 5 20, 26) aver that he willfully misapplied the funds of the bank, with intent to defraud. Fourteen of them (4, 9, 17, 18 22, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35) aver that he unlawfully caused false entries to be made in the books of the bank with intent to defraud and deceive. The remaining count (19) named in the verdict avers the unlawful making and drawing of a bill of exchange, without authority and with intent to defraud.
Of the first-mentioned counts for misapplication of funds, No. 3 reads as follows: 'And the grand jurors, aforesaid, upon their oath, aforesaid, do further present: That one Henry G Goll, late of the said Eastern District of Wisconsin, on the 7th day of December, A.D. 1904, at the city of Milwaukee in said district, was then and there the cashier, assistant cashier, clerk, and agent of a certain national banking association, the First National Bank of Milwaukee, theretofore duly organized, established, and then and there existing and doing business in the city of Milwaukee, county of Milwaukee, in said district, under the laws of the United States; and that on the said 7th day of December, A.D. 1904, at said city of Milwaukee in said district, the said Henry G. Goll, by virtue of his said office as said cashier, assistant cashier, clerk, and agent, and while he was employed therein, as aforesaid, had in his possession and under his control in said bank certain moneys of the said banking association, to a large amount and of great value, to the grand jury unknown, but exceeding the sum of twenty thousand dollars, then and there being; the particular kinds and descriptions of which last-named money the grand jurors aforesaid have no means of knowing, and therefore cannot set forth; that on the said 7th day of December, A.D. 1904, the said Henry G. Goll, at the city of Milwaukee, in said district, and within the jurisdiction of this court, and as such officer of such First National Bank of Milwaukee, and so, having in his possession the moneys aforesaid, did knowingly, willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously, and with intent to injure and defraud the said banking association, and Fred Vogel, Jr., Charles Pfister, George P. Miller, and divers other persons whose names are to the grand jurors unknown, then shareholders of said banking association, namely, the First National Bank of Milwaukee, transfer and pay over, and cause to be transferred and paid over, to one Gordon Bigelow, late of the said Eastern District of Wisconsin, from and out of the moneys of the said banking association, the First National Bank of Milwaukee, then and there so in his control as aforesaid, the sum of twenty thousand dollars, for the personal use and benefit then and there of the said Gordon Bigelow, and the same not then and there being in any wise a debt or obligation of the said First National Bank of Milwaukee, and in no wise for the purposes, uses, and benefit of the said banking association, and no wise in the regular course of business of said bank, and without any consideration whatever therefor passing to the said banking association, and the same being so paid without any authority whatsoever therefor from the board of directors, and without any proper authority, and the said Gordon Bigelow being then and there in no wise entitled to such payment, and the same being in no wise made on account of any debt, obligation, or liability of said First National Bank whatsoever; and that thereby the said Henry G. Goll, as such cashier, assistant cashier, clerk, and agent aforesaid, then and there, to wit, on the said 7th day of December, A.D. 1904, at the city of Milwaukee, in said district, by means of the payment aforesaid, in manner and form aforesaid, did willfully, wrongfully, and feloniously misapply the said sum of twenty thousand dollars of the moneys of the said First National Bank of Milwaukee, with intent then and there on the part of him, the said Henry G. Goll, to injure and defraud the said banking association, and Fred Vogel, Jr., Charles Pfister, George P. Miller, and divers other persons whose names are to the grand jury unknown, then shareholders of said banking association, namely, the First National Bank of Milwaukee, contrary to the form of the statute in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the United States of America.'
Count No. 4, for the making of false entries, reads as follows:
Count No. 19, for drawing a false bill of exchange, is as follows ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Givens
...the general ledger, and there were in truth what amounted to cashier's checks outstanding, this is not a false entry. (Goll v. United States, 151 F. 412, 80 C. C. A. 642; Hayes v. United States, 169 F. 101, 94 C. C. A. United States v. Young, 128 F. 111.) In cases of this kind an attesting ......
-
Carter v. Carter
...614; People v. Young, 151 N.Y. 210; Mattingly v. Darwin, 23 Ill. 618; Grant v. State, 62 Ala. 233; Ex parte Bond, 96 S.W. 1081; Goll v. United States, 151 F. 412; v. State, 45 S. E. (Ga.) 396; Buchanan v. State, 45 S. E. (Ga.) 607; Ex parte Neil, 43 So. 615; Johnson v. Beazley, 65 Mo. 250; ......
- National Exch. Bank of Providence v. United States