Gomez v. Perez

Decision Date17 January 1973
Docket NumberNo. 71-575,71-575
Citation93 S.Ct. 872,409 U.S. 535,35 L.Ed.2d 56
PartiesLinda GOMEZ, Individually and as Next Friend of Zoraida Gomez, Appellant, v. Francisco Ocasio PEREZ
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Stanley Dalton Wright, Houston, Tex., for appellant.

Joseph Jaworski, Houston, Tex., as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below.

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the laws of Texas may constitutionally grant legitimate children a judicially enforceable right to support from their natural fathers and at the same time deny that right to illegitimate children.

In 1969, appellant filed a petition in Texas District Court seeking support from appellee on behalf of her minor child. After a hearing, the state trial judge found that appellee is 'the biological father' of the child, and that the child 'needs the support and maintenance of her father,' but concluded that because the child was illegitimate 'there is no legal obligation to support the child and the Plaintiff take nothing.' The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed this ruling over the objection that this illegitimate child was being denied equal protection of law. 466 S.W.2d 41. The Texas Supreme Court refused application for a writ of error, finding no 'reversible error.' We noted probable jurisdiction. 408 U.S. 920, 92 S.Ct. 2479, 33 L.Ed.2d 331.

In Texas, both at common law and under the statutes of the State, the natural father has a continuing and primary duty to support his legitimate children. See Lane v . Phillips, 69 Tex. 240, 243, 6 S.W. 610, 611 (1887); Tex.Fam.Code § 4.02 (1970) (husband's duty).1 That duty extends even beyond dissolution of the marriage, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat., Art. 4639a (Supp.1972—1973); Hooten v. Hooten, 15 S.W.2d 141 (Tex.Civ.App.1929), and is enforceable on the child's behalf in civil proceedings and, further, is the subject of criminal sanctions. Tex. Penal Code § 602. The duty to support exists despite the fact that the father may not have custody of the child. Hooten v. Hooten, supra. The Court of Civil Appeals has held in this case that nowhere in this elaborate statutory scheme does the State recognize any enforceable duty on the part of the biological father to support his illegitimate children and that, absent a statutory duty to support, the controlling law is the Texas common-law rule that illegitimate children, unlike legitimate children, have no legal right to support from their fathers. See also Home of the Holy Infancy v. Kaska, 397 S.W.2d 208 (Tex.1965); Lane v. Phillips, supra, at 243, 6 S.W., at 611; Bjorgo v. Bjorgo, 391 S.W.2d 528 (Tex.Civ.App.1965). It is also true that fathers may set up illegitimacy as a defense to prosecutions for criminal nonsupport of their children. See Curtin v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 625, 238 S.W.2d 187 (1950); Beaver v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 179, 256 S.W. 929 (1923).

In this context appellant's claim, on behalf of her daughter that the child has been denied equal protection of the law is unmistakably presented. Indeed, at argument here, the attorney for the State of Texas, appearing as amicus curiae, conceded that but for the fact that this child is illegitimate she would be entitled to support from appellee under the laws of Texas.2

We have held that under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment a State may not create a right of action in favor of children for the wrongfu- l death of a parent and exclude illegitimate children from the benefit of such a right. Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68, 88 S.Ct. 1509, 20 L.Ed.2d 436 (1968). Similarly, we have held that illegitimate children may not be excluded from sharing equally with other children in the recovery of workmen's compensation benefits for the death of their parent. Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406 U.S. 164, 92 S.Ct. 1400, 31 L.Ed.2d 768 (1972).3 Under these decisions, a State may not invidiously discriminate against illegitimate children by denying them substantial benefits accorded children generally. We therefore hold that once a State posits a judicially enforceable right on behalf of children to needed support from their natural fathers there is no constitutionally sufficient justification for denying such an essential right to a child simply because its natural father has not married its mother. For a State to do so is 'illogical and unjust.' Id., at 175, 92 S.Ct., at 1406. We recognize the lurking problems with respect to proof of paternity. Those problems are not to be lightly brushed aside, but neither can they be made into an impenetrable barrier that works to shield otherwise invidious discrimination. Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 656—657, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1215—1216, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972); Carrington v. Rash, 380 U.S. 89, 85 S.Ct. 775, 13 L.Ed.2d 675 (1965).

The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

It is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.

Mr. Justice STEWART, with whom Mr. Justice REHNQUIST joins, dissenting.

This case came here as an appeal, on the representation that the Texas courts had sustained the constitutionality of § 4.02 of the Texas Family Code and Articles 602 and 602—A of the Texas Penal Code, over a challenge to those statutes under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We noted probable jurisdiction, 408 U.S. 920, 92 S.Ct. 2479, 33 L.Ed.2d 331, to consider whether the alleged discrimination between legitimate and illegitimate children, in terms of the support obligations of their biological fathers, denied equal protection to illegitimate children under the principles of Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406 U.S. 164, 92 S.Ct. 1400, 31 L.Ed.2d 768; Glona v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., 391 U.S. 73, 88 S.Ct. 1515, 20 L.Ed.2d 441; and Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68, 88 S.Ct. 1509, 20 L.Ed.2d 436.

Upon the submission of briefs and oral argument, it became clear that neither statute had been the actual subject of litigation in the courts of Texas. Hence, this is not properly an appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1257(2). I would, therefore, dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, and treat 'the papers whereon the appeal was taken' as a ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
349 cases
  • Gilliard v. Kirk
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of North Carolina
    • May 7, 1986
    ...because its natural father has not married its mother. For a State to do so is `illogical and unjust.'" Gomez v. Perez, 409 U.S. 535, 538, 93 S.Ct. 872, 875, 35 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973), with reference to Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406 U.S. 164, 92 S.Ct. 1400, 31 L.Ed.2d 768 (1972) (Gom......
  • Estate v. Britel
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • April 23, 2015
    ...U.S. 1, 103 S.Ct. 2199, 76 L.Ed.2d 372 ; Trimble v. Gordon (1977) 430 U.S. 762, 97 S.Ct. 1459, 52 L.Ed.2d 31 ; Gomez v. Perez (1973) 409 U.S. 535, 93 S.Ct. 872, 35 L.Ed.2d 56 ; Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (1972) 406 U.S. 164, 92 S.Ct. 1400, 31 L.Ed.2d 768 ; Glona v. American Guaran......
  • Stennett v. Miller
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • April 12, 2019
    ...rights to a dependent child based solely on his or her parents’ marital status, and are thus inapposite. (See Gomez v. Perez (1973) 409 U.S. 535, 538, 93 S.Ct. 872, 35 L.Ed.2d 56 [Texas law that allowed only marital children to obtain financial support from fathers was "invidious" discrimin......
  • Darces v. Woods
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • April 20, 1984
    ..."illogical and unjust" to deprive a child "simply because its natural father has not married its mother." (Gomez v. Perez (1973) 409 U.S. 535, 538, 93 S.Ct. 872, 875, 35 L.Ed.2d 56; see also Trimble v. Gordon (1977) 430 U.S. 762, 97 S.Ct. 1459, 52 L.Ed.2d 31; Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Suret......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 books & journal articles
  • Nancy E. Dowd, Fathers and the Supreme Court: Founding Fathers and Nurturing Fathers
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Law Journal No. 54-3, 2005
    • Invalid date
    ...Lalli v. Lalli, 439 U.S. 259 (1978); Trimble v. Gordon, 430 U.S. 762 (1977); Mathews v. Lucas, 427 U.S. 495 (1976); Gomez v. Perez, 409 U.S. 535 (1973); N.J. Welfare Rights Org. v. Cahill, 411 U.S. 619 (1973); Weber v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 406 U.S. 164 (1972); Labine v. Vincent, 401 U.S. ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • January 1, 2007
    ...1612 Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U.S. 996, 100 S.Ct. 533, 62 L.Ed.2d 428 (1979), 668, 673, 683, 685, 689-91, 784-85, 933 Gomez v. Perez, 409 U.S. 535, 93 S.Ct. 872, 35 L.Ed.2d 56 (1973), 1178 Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339, 81 S.Ct. 125, 5 L.Ed.2d 110 (1960), 1079 Gong Lum v. Rice, 275 U......
  • Unmarried Fathers and Adoption: 'Perfecting' or 'Abandoning' an Opportunity Interest
    • United States
    • Capital University Law Review No. 36-2, December 2007
    • December 1, 2007
    ...children from sharing equally with marital children in recovery of workers’ compensation benefits upon death of parent); Gomez v. Perez, 409 U.S. 535 (1973) (denying right of paternal support to nonmarital children while granting it to marital children violates the Equal Protection Clause).......
  • LEGITIMIZING ILLEGITIMACY IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.
    • United States
    • Washington University Law Review Vol. 99 No. 6, August 2022
    • August 1, 2022
    ...Are Mothers' Duties: The Failure of Equal Protection in Miller v. Albright, 109 YALE L.J. 1669, 1683-84 (2000). (26.) See Gomez v. Perez, 409 U.S. 535, 538 (1973) ("[T]here is no constitutionally sufficient justification for denying [child support to] a child simply because its natural fath......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT