Gonzalez-Ramirez v. United States
| Citation | 175 L.Ed.2d 370,558 U.S. 1004,130 S.Ct. 524 (Mem) |
| Decision Date | 02 November 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 09–6745.,09–6745. |
| Parties | Fernando GONZALEZ–RAMIREZ, aka Fernando, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
United States v. Pelletier
...in the light most favorable to the verdict. United States v. Gonzalez–Ramirez, 561 F.3d 22, 24 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 524, 175 L.Ed.2d 370 (2009). The scheme at the heart of Pelletier's convictions was relatively simple. A confederate of Pelletier's either swam o......
-
United States v. Boomer
......United States, 536 U.S. 545, 568-69 (2002) (recognizing criticisms of mandatory minimum sentencing provisions, but not holding them unconstitutional); Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453, 467 (1991) (noting that determinate sentences are not unconstitutional); United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez, 561 F.3d 22, 30 (1st Cir. 2009) (deciding that prosecutor's discretion to seek enhanced minimum sentence does not violate separation of powers doctrine), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 524 (2009). Boomer argues that his 125-month sentence on count one is substantively unreasonable because ......