Gonzalez v. Comm'r Of Correction.

Decision Date22 September 2010
PartiesOdilio GONZALEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

298 Conn. 918
4 A.3d 1226

Odilio GONZALEZ
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided Sept. 22, 2010.


Michael E. O'Hare, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Robert J. McKay, special public defender, in opposition.

The petition by the respondent for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn.App. 705, 1 A.3d 170 (2010), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Whether the Appellate Court properly ruled that the sixth amendment confers a right to the effective assistance of counsel in matters pertaining to credit for presentence confinement?

“2. Whether the Appellate Court properly ruled that the petitioner met his burden of showing deficient performance and prejudice within the meaning of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)?”

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Gonzalez v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 14, 2013
    ...within the meaning of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)?” Gonzalez v. Commissioner of Correction, 298 Conn. 918, 919, 4 A.3d 1226 (2010).1 We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court. The opinion of the Appellate Court sets forth the following r......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT