Gonzalez v. Secretary for Dept. of Corrections, 02-12054.
Decision Date | 01 April 2003 |
Docket Number | No. 02-12483.,No. 02-14224.,No. 02-12054.,02-12054.,02-12483.,02-14224. |
Citation | 326 F.3d 1175 |
Parties | Aurelio O. GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, James Crosby, Secretary, Respondent-Appellee. Emil Lazo, Petitioner-Appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-Appellee. Stephen A. Mobley, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frederick Head, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Paulette R. Taylor, Miami, FL, for Secretary for Dept. of Corrections
Milton Hirsch and David O. Markus(Court-Appointed), Miami, FL, for Lazo.
Lynn Dena Rosenthal, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Anne R. Schultz, Dawn Bowen and Lisa T. Rubio, Miami, FL, for U.S.
Brian Steel, The Steel Law Firm, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Mobley.
Beth Attaway Burton, State of GA Law Dept., Atlanta, GA, for Head.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida(Nos. 97-01935-CV-UUB, 96-08752-CV-WJZ and 90-08108-CR-WJZ); Ursula Ungaro-Benages
and William J. Zloch, Judges.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia(No. 99-00023-CV); Robert L. Vining, Jr., Judge.
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.
Prior report: 314 F.3d 571;317 F.3d 1308;306 F.3d 1096
The Court has determined to hear the following casesen banc: Mobley v. Head,No. 02-14224, Lazo v. U.S.,No. 02-12483, andGonzalez v. Sec'y for the Dept. of Corrections,No. 02-12054.
The cases will be orally argued before the Court sitting en banc on June 17, 2003, in Atlanta, Georgia.
The Courtsua sponte VACATES the following orders: the December 16, 2002, Order issued in Lazo v. U.S.,No. 02-12483, as well as the January 10, 2003 and the August 15, 2002, Orders issued in Gonzalez v. Sec'y for the Dept. of Corrections,No. 02-12054.
Nos. 02-12483and02-12054 are hereby REINSTATED.
Counsel for Appellants Lazo and Gonzalez will be appointed by separate Order.
In light of the above, Appellant Gonzalez' "Motion to Reconsider, Vacate or Modify" is DENIED AS MOOT.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Gonzalez v. Secretary for Dept. of Corrections
...judgments that denied § 2254 relief (in two of the cases before us), or § 2255 relief (in one of the cases). Gonzalez v. Sec'y of the Dep't of Corr., 326 F.3d 1175 (11th Cir.2003). Specifically, we asked each of the three would-be appellants to brief and argue, insofar as it related to his ......
-
Lynn v. United States
...should be dismissed." Lazo v. United States, 314 F.3d 571, 574 (11th Cir. 2002), vacated on other grounds sub nom. Gonazlez v. Secretary, 326 F.3d 1175 (11th Cir. 2003), superseding opinion, 366 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2004) (en banc); accord Section 2255 Rule 4(b) (when the motion on its face......
-
Howard v. United States
... ... Gonzalez v. Secretary for the Dep't of Corrs., ... 326 F.3d ... ...
-
Thomas v. Troy City Bd. of Educ.
... ... Texas Dept. of Protective and Regulatory Servs., 164 F.3d 277, 280 ... ...