Gonzalez v. Texas
| Docket Number | AP-77,066 |
| Decision Date | 04 November 2020 |
In October 2015, appellant Mark Gonzalez pled not guilty, but a jury convicted him of capital murder for the 2011 murder of a police officer, for which he was sentenced to death. Appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals was automatic. Appellant raised twenty-eight points of error. The Court addressed point number four: the trial court's juror substitution procedure, which was an issue of first impression. The remaining points of error...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
38 cases
-
Barron v. State
... ... Upon their arrival at the Snyder Police Department, Appellant and Nicole reported that they had killed two people who were trying to rob them. The officers on patrol were notified of this incident and were dispatched to the crime scene. Officer Nikki Gonzalez was nearby responding to an earlier report of a suspicious vehicle in the area of Appellant's trailer. Before she went to the crime scene, Officer Gonzalez investigated the presence of a maroon Crown Victoria with its engine running that was parked by the mailboxes near Appellant's trailer. After ... ...
- Gonzalez v. State
-
Banda v. State
... ... op., not designated for publication). Generally, the erroneous admission of evidence constitutes non-constitutional error, subject to a harm analysis, and requiring reversal only if it affects the substantial rights of the accused. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.2(b); Gonzalez v ... State , 544 S.W.3d 363, 373 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018); Amberson , 552 S.W.3d at 334. We review the entire record—"including any testimony or physical evidence admitted for the jury's consideration, the nature of the evidence supporting the verdict, and the character of the alleged error and ... ...
-
Rodriguez v. State
... ... V ... Extraneous-Matter Evidence ... By his ... fifth issue, appellant argues that the trial court ... erroneously admitted the testimony of Officers Ortiz and ... Cordova, Gonzalez, Clone, Chavez, Sanchez, and Jorge ... regarding appellant's past statements and actions in ... violation of Texas Rules of Evidence 401 (Test for Relevant ... Evidence), 403 (Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, ... Confusion, or Other Reasons), and 404(b) (Character ... ...
Get Started for Free