Goo v. Arakawa
Docket Number | SCWC-30142 |
Decision Date | 19 February 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Hawaiiusa Fed. Credit Union v. Monalim
...decline to deviate from the basic principle of law that fact-finding should be left to the fact-finder. See also Goo v. Arakawa, 132 Hawai‘i 304, 317, 321 P.3d 655, 668 (2014) ("[A] trial court is better equipped than an appellate court operating at a distance to fashion equitable relief.")......
-
Ocean Resort Villas Vacation Owners Ass'n v. Cnty. of Maui & Maui Cnty. Council
...233] (1994) , that, in general, ‘mootness by reason of settlement does not justify vacatur of a judgment under review.’ See Goo v. Arakawa, 132 Hawai‘i 302 [304], 314, 321 P.3d 655, 665 (2014) ." We further observed that, as a practical matter, the parties had stipulated to vacate one of t......
-
In re Elaine Emma Short Revocable Living Trust Agreement Dated July 17
...appellate review, it is not the function of the appellate court to conduct its own evidentiary analysis. See Goo v. Arakawa, 132 Hawai‘i 304, 317, 321 P.3d 655, 668 (2014) (holding that a fact-intensive inquiry is best handled by a trial court, not an appellate court, especially when the re......
-
Bridge Aina Le'A, LLC v. Haw. Land United Statese Comm'n, Civ. No. 11-00414 SOM-KJM
...the three prongs and is therefore not entitled to attorneys' fees under the private attorney general doctrine. See Goo v. Arakawa, 132 Haw. 304, 318, 321 P.3d 655, 669 (2014) ("All three prongs must be satisfied by the party seeking attorneys' fees."). 1. Prong One: Vindication of a Public ......
Request a trial to view additional results