Good Karma Productions v. Penthouse International Ltd.
| Decision Date | 02 June 1983 |
| Citation | Good Karma Productions v. Penthouse International Ltd., 464 N.Y.S.2d 751, 59 N.Y.2d 775 (N.Y. 1983) |
| Parties | , 451 N.E.2d 498 GOOD KARMA PRODUCTIONS, Appellant, v. PENTHOUSE INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Respondent. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (88 A.D.2d 561, 450 N.Y.S.2d 486).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Brian E. Weiss, D.D.S., P.C. v. Miller
... ... (Good Karma Productions v. Penthouse Int'l Ltd., 88 ... ...
-
C.K.S. Ice Cream Co., Inc. v. Frusen Gladje Franchise, Inc.
...at least on its contract cause of action if only to vindicate its right to nominal damages [Good Karma Productions v. Penthouse International, Ltd., 59 N.Y.2d 775, 464 N.Y.S.2d 751, 451 N.E.2d 498, affg. 88 A.D.2d 561, 450 N.Y.S.2d 486; Hirsch Electric Company, Inc. v. Community Services, I......
-
Crown Wisteria, Inc. v. Cibani
...[1st Dept. 2020]; Good Karma Prods, v. Pent-house Intl, 88 A.D.2d 561, 561, 450 N.Y.S.2d 486 [1st Dept. 1982], affd 59 N.Y.2d 775, 464 N.Y.S.2d 751, 451 N.E.2d 498 [1983]). Plaintiff’s representative gave no testimony as to damages on her direct examination, and her subsequent discussion of......
-
Crown Wisteria, Inc. v. Cibani
...Operating Corp., 189 A.D.3d 488, 489 [1st Dept 2020]; Good Karma Prods. v Penthouse Intl., 88 A.D.2d 561, 561 [1st Dept 1982], affd 59 N.Y.2d 775 [1983]). Plaintiff's representative gave testimony as to damages on her direct examination, and her subsequent discussion of damages was at best ......