Goode v. State, 4 Div. 931

Decision Date29 December 1981
Docket Number4 Div. 931
Parties2 Ed. Law Rep. 323 Alberta E. GOODE v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals

Winn S. L. Faulk, Dothan, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen. and Leura J. Garrett, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BOOKOUT, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of assault in the third degree per § 13A-6-22, Code of Ala.1975, as amended. She was fined $250 and costs, and this appeal comes directly to this court pursuant to Code § 12-12-72(1).

We find an adequate statement of the facts recited in the State's brief which we hereinbelow set out, omitting the record page references therein:

"Stevie Walden, an eighth grader at Cottonwood High School at the time of the event in question, testified that on the morning of May 15, 1981, he was in his homeroom class and Appellant was his teacher. He stated that he went to Appellant's desk and picked up her thermos and asked her what was in it. Walden testified that Appellant told him to put her thermos down, walked over to him, stuck him in the arm with a pencil and swung her grade book at him. Walden said he told her to 'get her ass out of my way' and then walked to Coach Tew's office. Walden further testified that Coach Tew treated his wound and took him to the hospital emergency room, where his wound was checked for lead and dressed.

"In addition, Walden testified that he had placed Appellant's thermos back on her desk before she struck him, and she struck at him in an overhanded manner with the pencil clasped in her palm.

"Marty Sizemore, Dewayne Efford, Michael Price, and Fred Hardwick, Walden's fellow classmates who witnessed the incident, all testified to substantially the same events as did Walden.

"Appellant, Alberta Goode, testified that the students who testified against her, including Stevie Walden, had been involved in discipline problems in her class prior to the incident in question.

"Appellant also testified that on May 15, 1981, she was standing in the doorway of her classroom with her grade book and a pencil in her hand supervising students when a student yelled, 'Mrs. Goode, Stevie has your thermos.' Appellant stated that she knew there was liquid in the thermos, and that the top of the thermos was almost open. In addition, Appellant stated that her desk was filled with test papers, reports, and stencils which had been typed for her tests, which would have been ruined had they come in contact with the liquid in the thermos.

"Appellant further testified that because of the danger to her papers, she rushed to her desk and pushed his hand so he wouldn't spill the contents of the thermos but that she was not aware that her pencil was still in her hand or that she had injured Walden."

The district court judge, to find the appellant guilty, must have found from the evidence that the appellant caused "physical injury" to another either (1)...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Alvis v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 5 Julio 1983
    ...the victim may have encountered some risk of death, the physician could not say that it was a substantial risk. See Goode v. State, 408 So.2d 198 (Ala.Cr.App.1981) (victim's testimony that wound "hurt" was not evidence of "substantial pain."). In addition, Officer Knizel testified that he w......
  • Thomas v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 24 Agosto 1982
    ...v. Rumaner, 45 A.D.2d 290, 357 N.Y.S.2d 735 (1974), and Brown v. State, 605 S.W.2d 572 (Tex. Cr. App. 1980); compare, Goode v. State, 408 So.2d 198 (Ala. Cr. App. 1981) (no evidence in support of third degree assault.) Since the question of whether or not the victim received a "serious phys......
  • Burger v. State, CR-03-0236.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • 25 Febrero 2005
    ...failed to prove that Officer Tom Walker had sustained a "physical injury." She argues that this case is similar to Goode v. State, 408 So.2d 198, 199 (Ala.Crim.App.1981), in which the victim was stabbed in the arm with a pencil and testified "simply that `it hurt.'" This court reversed Good......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT