Gooden v. Police Jury of Lincoln Parish
Decision Date | 30 November 1908 |
Docket Number | 17,322 |
Citation | 48 So. 196,122 La. 755 |
Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
Parties | GOODEN et al. v. POLICE JURY OF LINCOLN PARISH et al |
Rehearing Denied January 18, 1909.
Appeal from Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lincoln Robert Brooks Dawkins, Judge.
Suit by J. W. Gooden and others against the Police Jury of Lincoln Parish and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed, and suit dismissed.
Barksdale & Barksdale, for appellants.
Barnette & Roberts, for appellees.
The plaintiffs alleged that they are residents, citizens, and taxpayers of ward 1, Lincoln parish; that about the month of January, 1908, one-third or more of the citizens and taxpayers of ward 1, Lincoln parish, La., who were authorized to vote under the Constitution and laws of this state, petitioned the police jury for Lincoln parish to order a special election for said ward of said parish to vote upon a proposition of levying a special ad valorem tax of five mills on the dollar upon all the assessable property in said ward, for the purpose of aiding in the building and construction of the proposed line of railroad through a portion of Lincoln parish, to be known as the "Ruston, Natchitoches & Northeastern Railroad Company," for a period of time not to exceed 10 years; that the said police jury failed to order said election as prayed for, whereupon the courts of said parish were appealed to for a writ of mandamus to compel the police jury to order said election. After trial of said cause the courts granted the writ, whereupon the said election was ordered, same being ordered held according to law, at the regular polling places in said ward, which election was duly held on the 5th day of May, 1908.
Petitioners represent that they are citizens and taxpayers of said ward and have a right to appear and contest this tax; that they have interest in same being annulled and set aside; that the said tax as above alleged is illegal, null, and void, and should be set aside for the following reasons, to wit:
First. That the petition praying for the election did not set forth the amount to be raised each year; that only a rate of five mills was stipulated to be raised each year.
Second. That the petition did not set out any definite number of years that said tax should run, but only that it should not exceed the constitutional limit of 10 years, this pretended limitation having no effect whatever, for the stipulation would have been written therein by the Constitution of this state, had said petition been silent upon this point. Petitioners aver that for the two reasons above stated the said tax is an absolute nullity; that both the amount to be raised each year and the exact time that the tax shall run must be set out in said petition, under the pain of nullity; that this suit is filed within three months from the holding and promulgation of this election; that the act of the said police jury in ordering this election upon this fatally defective petition is illegal, null, and void; that the said police jury should be cited to answer hereto; that each member should be so cited, and served in accordance with law; that said Ruston, Natchitoches & Northeastern Railroad Company should also be cited to appear and defend whatever interest it may have in the result of this suit.
In view of the premises, petitioners prayed for service hereof and citation in accordance with law upon the members of the police jury of Lincoln parish, La., also upon the said Ruston, Natchitoches & Northeastern Railroad Company, a corporation also domiciled in Lincoln parish, with J. C. Nolan, of same residence, as its president, and, after due and legal trial had, for judgment in their favor, annulling, avoiding, and setting aside the tax as above alleged, and enjoining the police jury from levying said illegal tax. They prayed for all needful orders and decrees, and for costs and general relief.
Defendants answered. After pleading a general denial, they admitted that more than one-third of the property owners entitled to vote in the election in question petitioned the police jury according to law to order said election as alleged; that said election was regularly held in accordance with said petition and according to law on May 5, 1908, the returns regularly canvassed, and result promulgated according to law. Defendants alleged that said petition in all respects fairly, substantially, and completely complied with the law. They prayed that plaintiffs' demand be rejected with costs, and for general relief.
The district court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, annulling, avoiding, and setting aside the tax voted to the Ruston, Natchitoches & northeastern Railway Company on May 5, 1908, in ward 1, Lincoln parish.
The Ruston, Natchitoches & Northeastern Railway Company have appealed.
The petition of taxpayers referred to in plaintiffs' petition was as follows:
Here follow the signatures of taxpayers.
The police jury of Lincoln parish, La., acted upon this petition in its ordinance No. 66, entitled:
"An ordinance ordering an election in pursuance to petition of the property tax payers of ward 1, of Lincoln Parish, Louisiana, including the town of Ruston, for the purpose of submitting to the property tax payers entitled to vote thereat, the proposition whether or not they will authorize the police jury of Lincoln parish, to levy and collect annually from year to year, a special tax of five mills on the dollar for ten years, on all assessable property in said ward to the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars in favor of the Ruston, Natchitoches and Northeastern Railroad Company for the purpose of aiding said Ruston, Natchitoches and Northeastern Railroad Company in building and operating a standard gauge steam railroad from the town of Ruston, La., to a point at or near to the town of Farmerville, La., the avails of such a tax to be paid annually to said railroad company, its successors or assigns, provided said Ruston, Natchitoches and Northeastern Railroad, or such railroad as it may form part of shall have been completed and in operation on or before July 1st, 1910, fixing the date and providing for the manner of holding said election."
The ordinance so adopted was as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Roseberry v. Norsworthy
... ... 187, 88 S.W. 542, 89 S.W. 552; Gooden v. Lincoln Parish ... Police Jury, 122 La. 755, 48 So ... ...
-
Park, Grant, & Morris v. Nordale
... ... v. International ... etc. Co. (Ky.) 115 S.W. 703; Gooden v. Lincoln etc ... Jury (La.) 48 So. 196; Cearfoss v ... ...
-
93-1349 La.App. 3 Cir. 9/21/94, Bumgarden v. Wackenhut Corrections Corp.
... ... at the Allen Correctional Institute, in Allen Parish, which is operated by Wackenhut. Bumgarden alleges that on ... art. 9; Gooden v. Police Jury of Lincoln Parish, 48 So. 196 (La.1909) ... ...
- Delta & Pine Land Co. v. Adams