Goodin v. State
| Decision Date | 07 August 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 2002-DR-00686-SCT.,2002-DR-00686-SCT. |
| Citation | Goodin v. State, 856 So.2d 267 (Miss. 2003) |
| Parties | Howard Dean GOODIN (Gooden) v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Terri L. Marroquin, Robert M. Ryan, Jackson, attorneys for appellant.
Office of the Attorney General by Judy T. Martin, Marvin L. White, Jr., attorneys for appellee.
EN BANC.
¶ 1.Howard Dean Goodin was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death for the murder of Willis Rigdon.Goodin's conviction and sentence were affirmed by this Court on direct appeal.SeeGoodin v. State,787 So.2d 639(Miss.2001), cert. denied,535 U.S. 996, 122 S.Ct. 1558, 152 L.Ed.2d 481(2002).Goodin filed his Application for Leave to File Petition for Post-Conviction Relief in this Court on April 30, 2002, raising nine grounds for relief under the Mississippi Uniform Post-Conviction Collateral Relief Act, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 99-39-1 to -29 (Rev.2000 & Supp.2002).While many of the issues are procedurally barred, we consider them to the extent necessary to address Goodin's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and mental illness.Finding that he has succeeded in presenting a substantial showing of the denial of a state or federal right and that his attorney's performance at trial was constitutionally deficient, we grant Goodin's application for leave to seek post-conviction relief in part and deny it in part.
¶ 2.The following statement of facts is taken from this Court's opinion:
¶ 3.On April 30, 2002, Goodin filed his Application for Leave to File Petition for Post-Conviction Relief with this Court.In order to supplement his original petition, Goodin filed a rebuttal brief with additional exhibits on November 18, 2002.Therefore, the State has filed a Motion to StrikePetitioner's Rebuttal Brief which this Court will address in addition to the issues raised by Goodin in his application.
¶ 4.Goodin's application raises the following issues:
¶ 5.Under these first three issues, Goodin discusses procedural matters which will be discussed as follows under each issue as necessary.
IV.Whether Petitioner's constitutional rights under the Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article Three, Sections 24,26,28and29, of the Mississippi Constitution were violated by numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct.
¶ 6.On direct appeal Goodin alleged that the trial court erred in allowing the State to argue, in closing argument in the sentencing phase, that Willis Rigdon did not have the protection of the law, the jury system and the Constitution the night of his murder as did Goodin during his trial.This Court found no reversible error, stating:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Branch v. State
... ... State, 732 So.2d 187, 190 (Miss.1999) ... ¶ 18. We have stated that "there is conflicting authority on whether this Court should apply the procedural bar" in a post-conviction relief case raising ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. Goodin v. State, 856 So.2d 267, 279 (¶ 30) (Miss.2003). Goodin was then permitted to proceed on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel and was granted an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he was "mentally retarded within the meaning of Atkins. " Although this case is a direct appeal, ... ...
-
Havard v. State
...of considering post-Atkins claims of mental retardation by death row inmates. Russell was followed by our decision in Goodin v. State, 856 So.2d 267, 274-82 (Miss.2003). Our cases dealing with Atkins issues via post-conviction relief proceedings are by now legion. See, e.g., Jordan v. State......
-
Hodges v. State
...apply the procedural bar in a post-conviction relief case raising ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. Goodin v. State, 856 So.2d 267, 279 (Miss.2003). Goodin was then permitted to proceed on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel and was granted an evidentiary hearin......
-
Hodges v. State
...apply the procedural bar in a post-conviction relief case raising ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. Goodin v. State, 856 So. 2d 267, 279 (Miss. 2003). Goodin was then permitted to proceed on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel and was granted an evidentiary hear......