Goodman v. United States

Decision Date16 October 1961
Docket NumberM,No. 281,281
Citation7 L.Ed.2d 75,82 S.Ct. 127,368 U.S. 14
PartiesRichard GOODMAN, also known as Dick Goodman, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES and O. Gordon Delk, Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue. isc
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Kenneth Carroad, Theodore Propp and Edwin L. Wolf, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox, for the United States and others.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. On writ of certiorari, judgment vacated and case remanded to the District Court to permit the United States to file an appropriate motion in that court to withdraw its prior application for an order directing petitioner to testify.

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Ellis v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • April 30, 1969
    ... ... We deal with a question of substantially increased credibility and reliability. Thus we do not hold that waiver takes place when a witness, who has made disclosures to investigating agents is called at trial, or before the grand jury. Compare United States v. Goodman, 289 F.2d 256, 259 (4th Cir.), vacated and remanded to the district court, 368 U.S. 14, 82 S.Ct. 127, 7 L.Ed.2d 75 (1961). While our rule is somewhat narrower than that urged by Professor McCormick, supra note 21, who suggests waiver as to disclosure in writing as well as sworn testimony, we feel ... ...
  • Martin v. Flanagan
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • February 19, 2002
    ... ... Williams, 200 Conn. 310, 319, 511 A.2d 1000 (1986), quoting Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 488, 71 S. Ct. 814, 95 L. Ed. 1118 (1951) ... "To sustain the privilege, it ... Goodman, 289 F.2d 256, 259 (4th Cir. 1961) ("[i]t has been uniformly held that [prior testimony] ... ...
  • United States v. Barnett
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 9, 1963
  • Camelot Group, Ltd. v. WA Krueger Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • March 12, 1980
    ...1206, 31 L.Ed.2d 253 (1972). 29 United States v. Goodman, 289 F.2d 256, 259-62 (4th Cir. 1961), vacated on other grounds, 368 U.S. 14, 82 S.Ct. 127, 7 L.Ed.2d 75 (1962); United States v. Seewald, 450 F.2d 1159, 1163 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 978, 92 S.Ct. 1206, 31 L.Ed.2d 253 (......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • "incorporation" of the Criminal Procedure Amendments: the View from the States
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 84, 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...United States, 244 U.S. 362 (1917)). 175. Id. at 749 (citing United States v. Goodman, 289 F.2d 256, 262 (4th Cir. 1961), vacated as moot, 368 U.S. 14 (1961)) (emphasis added). 176. See id. at 748-49 (citing four federal cases). 177. See id. at 749-50 (citing state and federal cases). 178. ......
  • The Civil Litigator
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 10-2, February 1981
    • Invalid date
    ...20. Supra, note 5; United States v. Miranti, 253 F.2d 135 (2nd Cir. 1958). 21. Goodman v. United States, 289 F.2d 256 (4th Cir.), vacated, 368 U.S. 14 (1961). 22. Ullman v. United States, 350 U.S. 422 (1956). 23. Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 411 (1972). Also see, U.S. v. Ward, ___ U.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT