Gordon v. Heller

Decision Date08 April 1935
Docket NumberNo. 99.,99.
Citation260 N.W. 156,271 Mich. 240
PartiesGORDON, Secretary of Banking, v. HELLER.
CourtMichigan Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Action by William D. Gordon, Secretary of Banking of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, against Bernard Heller. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washtenaw County; George W. Sample, Judge.

Argued before the Entire Bench.

Hooper & Hooper, of Ann Arbor, for appellant.

Burke & Burke, of Ann Arbor, for appellee.

WIEST, Justice.

This is an action at law upon a judgment rendered against defendant in the court of common pleas for the county of Philadelphia, state of Pennsylvania, on April 19, 1933. The trial judge held the foreign judgment void, because the statute of limitations of Pennsylvania had run against the obligation at the time of judgment.

We gather from the record that defendant executed a note, secured by mortgage upon his property in Pennsylvania, and, at the same time, he gave a bond and warrant of attorney. The bond and warrant set forth: ‘Whereas, I, Bernard Heller, of the city and county of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in and by a certain obligation, bearing even date herewith, do stand firmly bound unto Alfred Yentis of the same place in the sum of ten thousand ($10,000.00) dollars lawful money of the United States of America, conditioned to keep and maintain at all times, until the full discharge of the said obligation, a policy or policies of insurance, in good and approved company or companies duly assigned as collateral to the obligee or his executors, administrators or assigns, to an amount not less than five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars, upon the buildings on the premises mortgaged by the mortgage securing the said obligation, and conditioned for the payment of the just sum of five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars at the expiration of three (3) years from the date thereof, together with interest payable half yearly at the rate of six (6%) per cent per annum and for the production to the obligee, his executors, administrators or assigns, on or before the first day of October of each and every year, of receipts for all taxes and water rates of the current year assessed upon the premises described in the mortgage accompanying said obligation: * * *. And provided further, however, and it is thereby expressly agreed, that if at any time thereafter, by reason of any default in the maintenance of said insurance, or in payment, either of said principal sum at maturity, or of said interest or in production of said receipts for taxes and water rates within the time specified, a writ of fieri facias is properly issued upon the judgment obtained upon said obligation, or by virtue of this warrant, or a writ of scire facias is properly issued upon the accompanying indenture of mortgage, an attorney's commission for collection, viz., (5%) per cent., shall be payable, and shall be recovered in addition to all principal and interest then due, besides costs of suit. These are to desire and authorize you, or any of you, to appear for me, my heirs, executors or administrators, in the said court or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Bode & Grenier, L.L.P. v. Knight
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • 20 Septiembre 2011
    ...a confession of judgment does not lend itself well to adding additional claims based upon the underlying debt. See Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 260 N.W. 156, 157 (1935) (stating that “the confession of judgment is purely ex parte”). While the defendants argue that Begin supports treatin......
  • USA JET AIRLINES, INC. v. Schick
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 28 Noviembre 2001
    ...Circuit Court, 26 Mich. 186, 188 (1872); see also Bielby v. Allender, 330 Mich. 12, 14-15, 46 N.W.2d 445 (1951); Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 243, 260 N.W. 156 (1935); Cofrode v. Circuit Judge of Wayne County, 79 Mich. 332, 348, 44 N.W. 623 (1890) (Campbell, J., dissenting).3 B. Michiga......
  • State ex rel. Squire v. Eubank
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • 7 Octubre 1940
    ...Food Company v. Kirsch, 166 Mich. 433, 131 N.W. 1123, 38 L.R.A.,N.S., 814; Jones v. Turner, 249 Mich. 403, 228 N.W. 796;Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 260 N.W. 156;Carroll v. Gore, 106 Fla. 582, 143 So. 633, 89 A.L.R. 1495, 1503. Compare Egley v. T. B. Bennett & Co., 196 Ind. 50, 145 N.E.......
  • Bode & Grenier, LLP v. Knight
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • 23 Octubre 2015
    ...evidence of the demand for which such judgment was confessed." Id. § 600.2906(1). The process "is purely ex parte." Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 260 N.W. 156, 157 (1935). The party against whom judgment is entered never appears, having already consented to judgment. Michigan courts have......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT