Gordon v. Heller
Decision Date | 08 April 1935 |
Docket Number | No. 99.,99. |
Citation | 260 N.W. 156,271 Mich. 240 |
Parties | GORDON, Secretary of Banking, v. HELLER. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Action by William D. Gordon, Secretary of Banking of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, against Bernard Heller. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Washtenaw County; George W. Sample, Judge.
Argued before the Entire Bench.
Hooper & Hooper, of Ann Arbor, for appellant.
Burke & Burke, of Ann Arbor, for appellee.
This is an action at law upon a judgment rendered against defendant in the court of common pleas for the county of Philadelphia, state of Pennsylvania, on April 19, 1933. The trial judge held the foreign judgment void, because the statute of limitations of Pennsylvania had run against the obligation at the time of judgment.
We gather from the record that defendant executed a note, secured by mortgage upon his property in Pennsylvania, and, at the same time, he gave a bond and warrant of attorney. The bond and warrant set forth: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bode & Grenier, L.L.P. v. Knight
...a confession of judgment does not lend itself well to adding additional claims based upon the underlying debt. See Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 260 N.W. 156, 157 (1935) (stating that “the confession of judgment is purely ex parte”). While the defendants argue that Begin supports treatin......
-
USA JET AIRLINES, INC. v. Schick
...Circuit Court, 26 Mich. 186, 188 (1872); see also Bielby v. Allender, 330 Mich. 12, 14-15, 46 N.W.2d 445 (1951); Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 243, 260 N.W. 156 (1935); Cofrode v. Circuit Judge of Wayne County, 79 Mich. 332, 348, 44 N.W. 623 (1890) (Campbell, J., dissenting).3 B. Michiga......
-
State ex rel. Squire v. Eubank
...Food Company v. Kirsch, 166 Mich. 433, 131 N.W. 1123, 38 L.R.A.,N.S., 814; Jones v. Turner, 249 Mich. 403, 228 N.W. 796;Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 260 N.W. 156;Carroll v. Gore, 106 Fla. 582, 143 So. 633, 89 A.L.R. 1495, 1503. Compare Egley v. T. B. Bennett & Co., 196 Ind. 50, 145 N.E.......
-
Bode & Grenier, LLP v. Knight
...evidence of the demand for which such judgment was confessed." Id. § 600.2906(1). The process "is purely ex parte." Gordon v. Heller, 271 Mich. 240, 260 N.W. 156, 157 (1935). The party against whom judgment is entered never appears, having already consented to judgment. Michigan courts have......