Gordon v. State, 85-274

Decision Date11 December 1985
Docket NumberNo. 85-274,85-274
CitationGordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2748 (Fla. App. 1985)
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly 2748 Todd Andrew GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Ann N. Radabaugh, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and James A. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

RYDER, Chief Judge.

On March 1, 1984, Gordon pled nolo contendere to the crime of burglary of a conveyance which was committed on October 18, 1983.Gordon was placed on probation for five years with conditions of probation which included a required payment of $500.00 to the Lee County Fine and Forfeiture Fund.Gordon was also ordered to undergo drug abuse counseling at the Lee County Mental Health Department.

A warrant was issued on June 29, 1984 charging Gordon with violating five conditions of his probation.The warrant alleged that Gordon had failed to submit written monthly reports, pay the cost of supervision, changed his residence or employment or had left the county without prior consent of his probation officer, failed to pay the $500.00 assessment to the Lee County Fine and Forfeiture Fund, and that he had failed to enter into the drug counseling program at the Lee County Mental Health Department.A hearing on the charges was held on September 10, 1984.Gordon entered a plea of guilty as charged.The trial judge, rather than revoking Gordon's probation, entered an order of modification requiring Gordon to serve ninety days in the Lee County Jail with credit for time served, and included an additional condition of probation which was to require Gordon to enroll in and successfully complete a drug abuse rehabilitation program offered by an organization called Treatment Alternatives to Street Crimes.Later, another warrant was executed on ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Tuthill v. State, 86-847
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 15, 1987
    ...(Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (certifying to this Court identical questions); Monti v. State, 480 So.2d 223 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following revocation of probation is a serious matter, and so allows for a one ......
  • Young v. State, 87-783
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 1988
    ...(Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (certifying to this Court identical questions); Monti v. State, 480 So.2d 223 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Rule 3.701 d.14 merely recognizes that sentencing following revocation of probation is a serious matter, and so allows for......
  • Weathers v. State, s. 85-2008
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 1987
    ...probation on two occasions is a clear and convincing reason for departure. See Adams v. State, 490 So.2d 53 (Fla.1986); Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). The state has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the trial court would have departed solely on the basis of the pe......
  • DeLeon v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 1988
    ...DCA 1987). The timing of the violations is also a valid reason for departure. Adams v. State, 490 So.2d 53 (Fla.1986); Gordon v. State, 483 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). A calculated violation of community control, however, is an invalid reason for departure in that willfulness is an element......
  • Get Started for Free