Gorman v. O'Connor

Decision Date17 April 1893
Docket Number9
Citation155 Pa. 239,26 A. 379
PartiesGorman, Appellant, v. O'Connor
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

[Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Argued March 30, 1893

Appeal, No. 9, July T., 1892, by plaintiff, John V. Gorman et al., from decree of C.P. No. 3, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1885, No. 482, in favor of defendants, William O'Connor et al., dismissing bill in equity.

Bill to restrain transfer of fund in bank.

The ease was referred to B. Gordon Bromley, Esq., as master who reported as follows:

"The Ancient Order of Hibernians is an association existing in the United States, whose intent and purpose, as the preamble to its constitution declares, is 'to promote friendship unity, and true Christian charity among its members by raising and supporting a stock or fund of money for maintaining the aged, sick, blind and infirm members, for the legitimate expenses of the order, and for no other purpose whatever.' While possessing a charter in this state, it is, nevertheless, conducted as a voluntary association, being an integral part of a large body spread throughout the country, and governed by a general constitution, under which various divisions in each state are formed. The unit, so to speak, from which the intricate system of association and government takes its rise, is the division, of which any number may exist in this country. The five officers of the division, viz., the president, vice president, recording secretary, financial secretary, and treasurer, constitute the division board of directors, and the same officers of all the divisions in the county, together with the county delegate elected by them, constitute the county board of directors. There is a standing committee of each division, consisting of seven, whose duties are to inquire into the character and qualifications of persons proposed for membership, and try all charges preferred against members. The state delegate, secretary and treasurer are elected from the board of directors of all the divisions in the state. The state board of directors consists of the state and county and division officers throughout the state. A state convention is held biennially. The state delegates, state secretaries, state treasurer, and a county delegate from each county, together with an additional delegate in each county for every one thousand members in good standing over and above the first thousand in said county; also the national directory (consisting of five members) elected by the national convention. This convention is presided over by a national delegate, who, with a national secretary and national treasurer, constitute the officers of the convention, and are elected by the same.

"The national directory, with the national officers, have power to adjust all questions of national importance. They are practically the ruling body of the order in all matters affecting the general interest, subject only to be reversed by the national convention. Their channel of communication with the various divisions is through the national secretary, the state delegate, the state secretary, and finally the county delegate. Each division has power to make its own rules for its internal welfare, provided they are in accordance with the constitution and subject to the approval of the state delegate, state secretary, and county delegate. These details of the machinery and workings of the order are obtained from the constitution of the order, placed in evidence by the defendant, and which was adopted at the national convention held at Cleveland, Ohio, May 16, 1884, before the split occurred, which is the source of the present controversy. In addition to this constitution, a set of by-laws adopted by the state convention were placed in evidence, which did not substantially conflict with the provisions of the constitution as above recited. By the terms of these by-laws a quorum for a division shall consist of five members, in conjunction with the president, vice president and secretary, or their representatives. The order is a beneficial association, its initiation fees, dues, fines and contributions being devoted to sick benefits under the rules of the order. Apart from the constitution and by-laws, evidence was adduced to prove an unwritten custom or understanding touching the secret features of the order. As to these features, the evidence discloses that the order originated many years ago as an independent organization, an outgrowth of, and bearing close friendly relations with, the order known as the Board of Erin in Great Britain. Their object being similar, their relationship was fostered by the interchange of cards, and transfer of membership was carried on through the medium of the national delegate, who, at stated intervals, received and transmitted through the regular channels to the several divisions the signs and passwords, termed goods and merchandise, in vogue in the Board of Erin, thus maintaining a constant and close affiliation with what was looked upon as the parent association abroad. Of this connection no mention is made in the written constitution, and no restraint or rule is imposed upon the national delegate or national directory regarding the maintenance or severance of the relations between them and the foreign board. No obligation was imposed by any agreement enforcible upon the foreign body to furnish the goods in question, such act being entirely optional and voluntary upon its part. That the general expectation of the members in joining the order was that the 'goods' should come from abroad seems free from doubt, but it is no less certain that in all matters affecting the interest of the order the decision of the national directory, in conjunction with the national officers, was final, subject only to be reversed by the national convention called in conformity to the constitution.

"Such being the organization of the order, some time in the month of June, 1884, after the close of the national convention, a call was made by one Murray, a city delegate of New York having no authority under the constitution to make a call, but being directed by the Board of Erin to do so, for an extra session of the national body to be held in New York in August of that year. This so-called convention was accordingly held, whereat a new set of national officers was selected and the 'goods' withheld from the national delegate duly elected at the regular convention held at Cleveland on May 16, 1884. A circular was then issued by the national directory and officers of the regular or Cleveland convention, announcing the severance of all the relations between the order and the Board of Erin. This circular was ordered to be read at two meetings of each division of the order, and was presented accordingly and read at the regular November meeting of the Division No. 4, of Philadelphia, held at Shear's Hall in that city. Subsequently it was again read at the December meeting of the division, when, in the language of the minutes, 'it was moved and seconded that the circular be received,' and the motion was 'agreed to.' At the next regular meeting of the division, on January 7, 1885, the question having arisen as to the acceptance of the minutes of the prior or December meeting, a vote was taken and the minutes were rejected so far as concerned the acceptance of the circular above mentioned. The evidence shows that the vote was close and there was much confusion, and there is a conflict of testimony as to what the vote was, but from the whole evidence the master finds that the majority favored the rejection of the minutes so far as the circular was concerned, the intention being to disavow the circular and reject the authority of the national directory in severing its allegiance to the Board of Erin. The officers of the division at that time were: William O'Connor, president; Patrick Gorman, vice president; James McGlinn, recording secretary; Edward McElroy, financial secretary; James Roane, treasurer. The standing committee consisted of Charles Coyle, Dennis Donovan, Patrick Burk, John O'Donnell, John Leonard, Michael McArdle, and Thomas Daly. When the sentiment of the majority manifested itself, great confusion resulted -- threats being used, and such disorder ensued that the president, William O'Connor, fearing trouble, resigned his office. J. V. Gorman was thereupon elected his successor in office, and the meeting calmed down sufficiently to permit of his being escorted to the chair by a committee appointed by the retiring president. Upon a motion to that effect, a vote of thanks was tendered Mr. O'Connor for his services. Thereupon the adherents of the Cleveland party left the hall, the retiring president having first delivered to the new president the seal of the order and all of the papers and its charter. Upon their departure, a new oath or obligation was administered by the vice president, Patrick Gorman, a form of the same having been obtained from the secretary of the New York convention, and which differed somewhat from the oath provided by the rules to be administered to members joining the order. The constitution of the order adopted at Cleveland was repudiated by the adoption of the old constitution of the order, which had been in force prior thereto, and from that time forward the Division No. 4, as represented by those who remained in the hall on the night of the split, recognized and affiliated with the order represented by the New York convention, and has ever since sent its delegate to the national convention of said order. There was much conflict of testimony as to the number of those who remained in the hall and of those who left at the time of the split. The general concensus would seem to make the whole number present between sixty and seventy. The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Bowman v. Anderson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 31 Mayo 1916
    ...N. J. E. 331; Grand Court v. Hodel, 74 Wash. 314; Polish Falcons v. Kubiak, 238 Pa. 464; Gross Lodge v. Brausch, 256 Ill. 185; Gorman v. O'Connor, 155 Pa. 239; Kayley McCourt, 235 Pa. 304; 29 Cyc. 30. (6) Defendants are not entitled to be subrogated to, or credited with, any claim paid by t......
  • The State ex rel. Hyde v. Jackson County Medical Society
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 27 Julio 1922
    ...The Missouri State Medical Association. Com. v. Heilman, 241 Pa. 374; 1 Bacon on Life & Accident Insurance (4 Ed.) sec. 92; Gorman v. O'Connor, 155 Pa. 239; v. Jones, 13 Wall. 679; Chamberlain v. Lincoln, 129 Mass. 70; Osceola Tribe v. Schmidt, 57 Md. 98. OPINION Mandamus. ELDER, J. This is......
  • Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen of Iowa v. Graham
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 22 Enero 1896
    ... ...          Dickinson ... v. Ancient Order of U. W., 159 Pa. 263; Com. v. Equitable ... Ben. Asso., 137 Pa. 419; Gorman v ... O'Connor, 155 Pa. 239; Northwestern Masonic Aid ... Asso. v. Jones, 154 Pa. 104; Johnson v. Philadelphia & R. R. Co., 163 Pa. 133; ... ...
  • Clark v. Brown
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 27 Febrero 1908
    ...1022, 26 L. R. A. 68; Cape v. Plymouth Church, 117 Wis. 150, 93 N. W. 450; Garten v. Penick, 9 Am. L. Reg. 219, and notes: Gorman v. O'Connor, 155 Pa. 239, 26 Atl. 379; Schiller Commandery v. Jaennichen, 116 Mich. 129, 74 N. W. 458; Koerner Lodge v. Grand Lodge, 146 Ind. 639, 45 N. E. 1103;......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT