Gorman v. The Board Of Commissioners Of Boise County
Citation | 1 Idaho 553 |
Parties | John Gorman, Appellant, v. The Board Of Commissioners Of Boise County Et Al., Respondents. |
Decision Date | 01 January 1874 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Idaho |
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-JURISDICTION.-A board of county commissioners is a tribunal created by statute, with limited jurisdiction and only quasi judicial powers, and cannot act except in strict accordance with the statute.
ASSESSOR-TAX COLLECTOR-OFFICIAL OATH.-An assessor and tax collector, whose oath of office as both assessor and tax collector is indorsed on his bond as assessor, is not required to take another oath as tax collector when he files his bond as tax collector.
OFFICIAL BOND, APPROVAL OF COMMISSIONERS.-It is the duty of the board of county commissioners to approve the bond of an assessor and tax collector pro forma, if, upon its face, it is prima facie good. The board may, at any time afterward, cite the sureties, to make a further justification, and, in case it is deemed insufficient, may cite the officer to show cause why his office should not be declared vacant.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-RECORD-PRESUMPTIONS.-The order of a board of county commissioners, requiring the officers-elect to give bonds in particular sums, is of no force except as to the officers-elect at the time of making such order. The board of county commissioners is required, by law, to keep a record of its proceedings, and no presumption arises as to the regularity of any of their proceedings, not appearing of record, even though parties may have acted upon the supposed order of such board.
TAX COLLECTOR-OFFICIAL BOND.-A tax collector is not required, by statute, to give a bond with sureties in double the amount of the whole penal sum of his bond.
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-JURISDICTION.-A board of county commissioners has no power or authority to pass upon the malfeasance or misfeasance of an officer; those questions belong to a higher tribunal, having jurisdiction to punish the officer, if found guilty.
INTENDMENTS-OFFICERS.-Every intendment of the law is to be taken in favor of those whom the people have elected to serve in an official capacity. Courts should not seek an excuse to defeat the will of the people, but rather to carry out and protect it.
APPEAL from the District Court of the Second Judicial District Boise County.
George Ainslie, Alanson Smith and Milton Kelly, for the Appellant. H. E. Prickett and J. W. Huston, for the Respondents.
delivered the opinion.
John Gorman was elected at the general election in November, 1872, to the office of assessor and tax collector of Boise county for the term of two years, commencing on the first Monday in January, 1873, on which day he filed the necessary bond as such assessor, which was approved by the board of county commissioners. He also took the necessary oath as assessor and tax collector, which was duly indorsed on the bond. On the eighth day of April, 1873, Gorman presented an additional bond as tax collector to the board in the sum of fifteen thousand dollars, which was rejected by the board for reasons stated by them, but not necessary here to consider. On the eleventh day of April, 1873, he presented a second bond as tax collector, to the board, which was also rejected, for the reasons following, to wit:
Further, "also Matt. Luney, who was on the bond offered on the eighth inst. for fifteen hundred dollars, whom we consider good for that amount at that time, is on the one offered this day for two thousand dollars; and in the meantime we have ascertained that he is on another bond for the sum of two thousand dollars, of which we had no knowledge on the eighth instant. He is also on the sheriff's bond as tax collector for the sum of one thousand two hundred and fifty dollars. This, with his other debts and liabilities, we consider more than his property is worth. Also Charles Kolny, one of the offered bondsmen, is liable on the bond of J. F. Cheatly, road supervisor of road district No. 2, for the sum of two thousand dollars, and on the bond of R. K. Errin, constable of Placerville, for the sum of one thousand dollars, and is assessed for only two thousand one hundred dollars.
"Also Hugh Craig's property consists principally of a
ranch, which may be held as a homestead, and that his indebtedness is equal to the remainder of his property.
From the order rejecting his bond, as also the order declaring the office of assessor and tax collector vacant, and the order appointing Davis assessor and tax collector of Boise county in his place, Gorman appealed...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Several and Separate Appeals of Overland Co.
...3 P. 22; Feltham v. Board of County Commrs., 10 Idaho 182, 77 P. 332; Humbird Lumber Co. v. Morgan, 10 Idaho 327, 77 P. 433; Gorman v. Board of Commrs., 1 Idaho 553; Orr v. State Board, 3 Idaho 190, 28 P. Evans v. Swendsen, 34 Idaho 290, 200 P. 136. Strict construction applied to taxing sta......
-
Seysler v. Mowery
... ... the mayor and council or board of trustees, while in session, ... and, if the contract is ... Shoshone County. Hon. William W. Woods, Judge ... Suit to ... Board of Auditors, ... 41 Mich. 4, 2 N.W. 180; Gorman v. County Commrs., 1 ... Idaho 553; Rankin v. Jauman, 4 ... ...
-
Boise Valley Traction Co. v. Ada County
... ... RATES FILED WITH PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION - AUTHORITY OF ... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS-RESERVATION UNDER C. S., SEC ... 1 ... Where no default was ... 521; Campbell v. Commissioners of Logan ... County, 4 Idaho 181, 37 P. 329; Gorman v. County ... Commrs., 1 Idaho 553; Fremont County v ... Brandon, 6 Idaho 482, 56 P. 264; Howell ... ...
-
In re Segregation of School District No. 58 from Rural High School District No. 1
...jurisdiction and only quasi-judicial powers, and therefore jurisdiction is not presumed, but must affirmatively appear. (Gorman v. Board of County Commrs., 1 Idaho 553; City of Ottawa v. Carey, 108 U.S. 110, 2 S.Ct. 361, 27 669.) The enactment permitting the segregation of a school district......