GORRELL v. BlER.
Decision Date | 09 July 1879 |
Citation | 15 W.Va. 311 |
Parties | GORRELL v. BlER. |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
A sheriff whose full term of office expired December 31, 1876. is eligible to fill a vacancy in the sheriffalty at an election held the second Tuesday of October, 1878; the third section of Art. IX of the Constitution only renders him ineligible to fill the full term of the sheriffalty beginning January 1, 1877.
Writ of error and supersedeas to a judgment of the circuit court of Pleasants county, rendered on the 28th day of November, 1878, in a proceeding on a writ of certiorari, in said court then pending, wherein Oliver Gorrell was plaintiff, and William E. Bier was defendant, granted on the petition of said Gorrell.
Hon. James M. Jackson, judge of the fifth judicial circuit, rendered the judgmentcomplained of.
Moore, Judge, furnishes the following statement of the case:
Oliver Gorrell, before the county-court of Pleasants county, at the November term, 1878, thereof, contested the right of William E. Bier to hold the office of sheriff for said county, to which said Bier claimed to have been elected, to fill a vacancy, at the general election held in said county on the 8th day of October, 1878. For the purpose of such contest, said Gorrell filed the following notice of contest:
as sheriff of Said COUllty.
County of Pleasants, to-wit: "Personally appeared before me, J. L. Knight, clerk of the county-court of the county aforesaid, Oliver Gorrell, whose name is signed to the foregoing notice, and made oath that the matters therein set forth, so far as they are stated on his own knowledge are true, and so far as they are stated on the information of others he believes them to be true.
And thereupon the contestant, O. Gorrell, moved the court to docket his said notice, which motion, together with the order of the court docketing the same, is in the words and figures following to-wit:
"This day came the contestant, by his attorney, and filed his notice of contest containing the grounds and specifications relied upon by contestant to defeat the defendant's right to the office of sheriff of Pleasants county, under the election held on the second Tuesday in October, 1878, to which office the defendant had been, by the officers conducting the electien at jthe court-house of said Pleasants county, declared elected as required by law, and on motion of said contestant, by his attorney, said notice was ordered to be docketed. And thereupon the said defendant, by his attorneys, moved the court to quash the return of the officer serving said notice, upon the ground that said officer was not an officer authorized by law to make such service; which motion being argued by counsel and considered by the court, the same was overruled. The defendant, by counsel, then moved the court to quash the said notice and the grounds and specifications therein contained, upon the ground that the same was not sufficient in law to require the defendant to answer thereto; which said motion having also been argued by counsel and considered by the court, the same was overruled. And thereupon the defendant, W. E. Bier, filed here in court his counter-notice of defense and of grounds contesting the right of the said contestant to the office of sheriff under the election aforesaid; and Gorrell filed his reply to the counter-notice. As the counter-notice and the reply thereto are not material in the decision of the points involved in the cause, so far as the Supreme Court has to consider the case, they are omitted from this statement.
The county-court having heard the evidence, on the 13th day of November, 1878, made the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Slater v. Varney, 10382
...by this Court in subsequent cases, and the decision in that case constitutes the law in this jurisdiction on that question. Gorrell v. Bier, 15 W.Va. 311; Dryden v. Swinburne, 20 W.Va. 89; Halstead v. Rader, 27 W.Va. 806. See also concurring opinion of Judge Rose in State ex rel. Savage v. ......
-
State ex rel. Cline v. Hatfield
...the nature of a writ of quo warranto, or an election contest. See Code, 53-2-1 and Code, 3-9-2; Dryden v. Swinburn, 15 W.Va. 234; Gorrell v. Bier, 15 W.Va. 311; Dryden v. Swinburne, 20 W.Va. 89; State ex rel. Savage v. Robertson, 124 W.Va. 667, 23 S.E.2d 281; Orndorff v. Potter, 125 W.Va. 7......
-
State ex rel. Zickefoose v. West
...during his term of service, or within one year thereafter, be eligible to any other office.' (Italics supplied.) In the case of Gorrell v. Bier, 15 W.Va. 311, the Court held that a sheriff who had completed the serving of one full term was not disqualified to be elected two years later to a......
-
State ex rel. Maloney v. McCartney, 13697
...of incumbents removes the temptation to prostitute the government to the perpetuation of a particular administration. Gorrell v. Bier, 15 W.Va. 311 (1879). While elections are won by 51% Of the vote, all of the people of a state must be served. Meretricious policies which sacrifice the well......