GOSHAYESHI v. MEHRABIAN
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | ELDRIDGE. |
| Citation | GOSHAYESHI v. MEHRABIAN, 501 S.E.2d 265, 232 Ga.App. 81 (Ga. App. 1998) |
| Decision Date | 03 April 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. A98A0857.,A98A0857. |
| Parties | GOSHAYESHI v. MEHRABIAN. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Dupree, Johnson & Poole, A. Gregory Poole, Marietta, for appellant.
Gerald W. Fudge, Atlanta, for appellee.
In this direct appeal following an arbitration award, appellant/defendant Mohammed Goshayeshi challenges a Cobb County trial court's order granting plaintiff/appellee's application to compel arbitration. Appellant asserts that he did not consent in writing to binding arbitration. It is for this reason also that appellant contends the trial court erred in subsequently affirming the arbitration award.
Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assoc., 215 Ga.App. 438, 439, 450 S.E.2d 828 (1994). The correctness of this mandatory procedure is illustrated no more clearly than in this case, wherein the record shows that appellant failed to take any affirmative action to stay arbitration proceedings prior to the trial court's order or to contest arbitration proceedings after the trial court's order.1
Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed. The order to compel arbitration from which Goshayeshi appeals is not a final judgment, and he failed to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34(b). Pace, supra at 439, 450 S.E.2d 828; McAllaster v. Merrill Lynch, etc., 212 Ga.App. 697, 443 S.E.2d 9 (1994).
Appeal dismissed.
1. In order to perfect the record for appellate review, a party must register a timely objection to a motion to compel arbitration. To that end, the statute provides that "a party who has not participated in the arbitration and who has not made an application to compel arbitration may apply to stay arbitration on the grounds that: (1) [n]o valid agreement to submit to arbitration was made; (2) [t]he agreement to arbitrate was not complied with; or (3) [t]he arbitration is barred by limitation of time." (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 9-9-6(b). Further, when...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Sawyers v. Herrin-Gear Chevrolet Co., Inc.
...Inc., 107 P.3d 1006, 1008 (Colo.Ct.App.2004); Evans v. Dreyfuss Bros., Inc., 971 A.2d 179, 186 (D.C.2009); Goshayeshi v. Mehrabian, 232 Ga.App. 81, 501 S.E.2d 265, 266 (1998); Dan Wiebold Ford, Inc. v. Universal Computer Consulting Holding, Inc., 142 Idaho 235, 127 P.3d 138, 141 (2005); Nat......
-
Extremity Healthcare, Inc. v. Access to Care Am., LLC
...is interlocutory in nature and must be appealed through our interlocutory application procedures. See Goshayeshi v. Mehrabian , 232 Ga.App. 81, 82, 501 S.E.2d 265 (1998). But, here, the trial court's order did not merely stay the judicial proceedings pending arbitration, leaving the case st......
- Wahnschaff v. Erdman
-
Torres v. Piedmont Builders, Inc.
...the procedures for interlocutory appeal under OCGA § 5-6-34(b). Piedmont argues that the case is not directly appealable, relying on Goshayeshi v. Mehrabian2 and Pace Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Associates,3 which state that "[t]he grant of an application to compel arbitration is not directl......