Gosselin's Dairy, Inc. v. School Committee of Holyoke

Decision Date01 March 1965
CitationGosselin's Dairy, Inc. v. School Committee of Holyoke, 205 N.E.2d 221, 348 Mass. 793 (Mass. 1965)
PartiesGOSSELIN'S DAIRY, INC. v. SCHOOL COMMITTEE OF HOLYOKE.
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

William C. Flanagan, Springfield, for petitioner.

Ralph J. Chouinard, City Sol., for respondent.

Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, CUTTER, SPIEGEL and REARDON, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

A judge of the Superior Court ordered that a writ of certiorari to review action of the school committee be dismissed. Gosselin's Dairy, Inc. (Gosselin's) appealed. The committee advertised for written bids to supply milk during the school year, 1964-1965, reserving the right to reject any bids. Gosselin's, which has its principal office in Chicopee, submitted a bid estimated to cost the city $65,650. The award was made to a firm, which submitted a bid estimated to cost the city $67,210. That firm was 'located in Holyoke.' The sole question is whether the award must be to the lowest responsible and eligible bidder because of G.L. c. 30, § 39M (inserted by St.1963, c. 842, § 1, entitled 'An Act to require that all contracts for construction and for materials be awarded to the lowest responsible and eligible bidder, and to assure full competition in the taking of bids for such contracts'.) In context § 39M(e) defining 'material' as 'any article, assembly, system, or any component part thereof,' must be interpreted as referring only to materials used in the construction, alteration, or repair of any public work. See 1963 Senate Doc.No. 563 and House Doc.No. 3470. The balance of § 39M is principally devoted to public works...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • Com. v. Gill
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • May 24, 1977
    ...108 N.E.2d 659 (1952). Rudolph v. City Manager of Cambridge, 341 Mass. 31, 33, 167 N.E.2d 151 (1960). Gosselin's Dairy Inc. v. School Comm. of Holyoke, 348 Mass. 793, 205 N.E.2d 221 (1965). Interstate Engr. Corp. v. Fitchburg, --- Mass. ---, ---, and ---, 329 N.E.2d 128 a (1975) (Wilkins, J......
  • Datatrol Inc. v. State Purchasing Agent
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • February 4, 1980
    ...therefor." Archambault v. Mayor of Lowell, 278 Mass. 327, 332, 180 N.E. 157, 159 (1932). Accord, Gosselin's Dairy, Inc. v. School Comm. of Holyoke, 348 Mass. 793, 205 N.E.2d 221 (1965); Marinucci Bros. & Co. v. Metropolitan Dist. Comm'n, 346 Mass. 763, 190 N.E.2d 208 (1963); Deary v. Dudley......
  • Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. School Committee of Burlington
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • July 30, 1975
    ...procedures are followed).' This section 'does not require award to the lowest responsible bidder.' Gosselin's Dairy, Inc. v. School Comm. of Holyoke, 348 Mass. 793, 205 N.E.2d 221 (1965).e. Mass.App.Ct.Adv.Sh. (1975) 820, ...
  • Thorn Transit Systems Intern., Ltd. v. Massachusetts Bay Transp. Authority
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • October 2, 1996
    ...Andover Consultants, Inc. v. Lawrence, 10 Mass.App.Ct. 156, 160, 406 N.E.2d 711 (1980). Contrast Gosselin's Dairy, Inc. v. School Comm. of Holyoke, 348 Mass. 793, 205 N.E.2d 221 (1965). In determining whether the subject contract involves (a) the construction, reconstruction, alteration, ma......
  • Get Started for Free