Gottlieb v. Barry
| Decision Date | 09 December 1994 |
| Docket Number | 93-1317,93-1389,Nos. 93-1316,93-1339,93-1367,93-1338,93-1334,93-1336 and 93-1337,s. 93-1316 |
| Citation | 43 F.3d 474 |
| Parties | Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,510 Feivel GOTTLIEB; Thomas R. Bloom; Leroy B. Mott; Marialice Mott; Kim Coles; Rosemary T. Martin; Kirk Martin; Mark G. Cucarola, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Timothy L. Welch and Dorothy A. Welch, Movants-Appellees, v. Arthur BARRY; Clifford Seiber; Morris Isaac; Robert Cahn; Leslie Jacobs; Jack Colman; James Back; Vincent Bury; Betty Goldberger; Wolf, Popper, Schiffrin & Craig; Stull, Stull & Brody; Wechsler, Skirnick, Harwood, Halebian & Feffer; Kaufman, Malchman, Kaufmann & Kirby; Gilman & Pastor; Stutz, Dyer & Miller, Movants-Appellants, Q.T. Wiles; Gerald Goodman; William R. Hambrecht; Gary E. Koenig; Russell E. Planitzer; Paul N. Risinger; Patrick J. Schleibaum; Jesse C. Parker; William P. Lorea; Owen Taranta; Kenneth A. Huff; Warren Perry; Hambrecht &Quist Group; Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners; Coopers & Lybrand; J.H. Whitney & Co.; J.H. Whitney Associates; Coopers & Lybrand (Singapore); Coopers & Lybrand (Hong Kong); Phoenix Venture (BVI) Limited; H & Q Ventures International C.V.; H & Q Ventures IV; William R. Hambrecht, as Trustee of the Hambrecht 1980 Revocable Trust; Sarah Hambrecht, as Trustee of the Hambrecht 1980 Revocable Trust; Q.T. Wiles Investment Joint Venture I; J.F. Shea Co., Inc.; William R. Timken; Arthur Rock; H & Q Alliance Fund; Hamquist; Banner Partners; Bryco Investments; Peter O. Crisp; H & Q Investors; Crisp Computer Corporation; Edgar L. Lowe; Richard M. Kulp, as Trustee of the Kulp 1983 Revocable Trust; Paloa S. Kulp, as Trustee of the Kulp 1983 Revocable Trust; John R. Johnston; Ta-Lin HSU; MiniScribe Corporation, Defendants. Feivel GOTTLIEB; Thomas R. Bloom; Leroy B. Mott; Marialice Mott; Kim Coles; Rosemary T. Martin; Kirk Martin; Mark G. Cucarola, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Timothy L. Welch and Dorothy A. Welch, Movants-Appellees, v. Michael VAN; Arthur Stein; Leslie M. Jacobs; Philip R. B |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Revocable Trust
Sarah Hambrecht, as Trustee of the Hambrecht 1980 Revocable
Trust; Q.T. Wiles Investment Joint Venture I; J.F. Shea
Co., Inc.; William R. Timken; Arthur Rock; H & Q Alliance
Fund; Hamquist; Banner Partners; Bryco Investments
Peter O. Crisp; H & Q Investors; Crisp Computer
Corporation; Edgar L. Lowe; Richard M. Kulp, as Trustee of
the Kulp 1983 Revocable Trust; Paloa S. Kulp, as Trustee of
the Kulp 1983 Revocable Trust; John R. Johnston; Ta-Lin
HSU; MiniScribe Corporation, Defendants
Feivel GOTTLIEB; Thomas R. Bloom; Leroy B. Mott
Marialice Mott; Kim Coles; Rosemary T. Martin; Kirk
Martin; Mark G. Cucarola, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees
and
Timothy L. Welch and Dorothy A. Welch, Movants-Appellees,
v.
OPPERMAN, HEINS & PAQUIN, Movants-Appellants,
Q.T. Wiles; Gerald Goodman; William R. Hambrecht; Gary E.
Koenig; Russell E. Planitzer; Paul N. Risinger; Patrick
J. Schleibaum; Jesse C. Parker; William P. Lorea; Owen
Taranta; Kenneth A. Huff; Warren Perry; Hambrecht & Quist
Group; Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners; Coopers &
Lybrand; J.H. Whitney & Co.; J.H. Whitney Associates;
Coopers & Lybrand (Singapore); Coopers & Lybrand (Hong
Kong); Phoenix Venture (BVI) Limited; H & Q Ventures
International C.V.; H & Q Ventures IV; William R.
Hambrecht, as Trustee of the Hambrecht 1980 Revocable Trust;
Sarah Hambrecht, as Trustee of the Hambrecht 1980 Revocable
Trust; Q.T. Wiles Investment Joint Venture I; J.F. Shea
Co., Inc.; William R. Timken; Arthur Rock; H & Q Alliance
Fund; Hamquist; Banner Partners; Bryco Investments;
Peter O. Crisp; H & Q Investors; Crisp Computer
Corporation; Edgar L. Lowe; Richard M. Kulp, as Trustee of
the Kulp 1983 Revocable Trust; Paloa S. Kulp, as Trustee of
the Kulp 1983 Revocable Trust; John R. Johnston; Ta-Lin
HSU; MiniScribe Corporation, Defendants.
Feivel GOTTLIEB; Thomas R. Bloom; Leroy B. Mott;
Marialice Mott; Kim Coles; Rosemary T. Martin; Kirk
Martin; Mark G. Cucarola, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and
Timothy L. Welch and Dorothy A. Welch, Movants-Appellees,
v.
Arthur BARRY; Clifford Seiber, Morris Isaac; Robert Cahn;
Leslie Jacobs; Jack Colman; James Back; Vincent Bury;
Betty Goldberger, Wolf, Popper, Ross, Wolf & Jones; Law
Offices of Joseph H. Weiss; Abbey & Ellis; Schiffrin &
Craig; Stull, Stull & Brody; Wechsler, Skirnick, Harwood,
Halebian & Feffer; Kaufman, Malchman, Kaufmann & Kirby;
Gilman & Pastor; Stutz, Dyer & Miller, Movants-Appellants,
Q.T. Wiles; Gerald Goodman; William R. Hambrecht; Gary E.
Koenig; Russell E. Planitzer; Paul N. Risinger; Patrick
J. Schleibaum; Jesse C. Parker; William P. Lorea; Owen
Taranta; Kenneth A. Huff; Warren Perry; Hambrecht & Quist
Group; Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners; Coopers &
Lybrand; J.H. Whitney & Co.; J.H. Whitney Associates;
Coopers & Lybrand (Singapore); Coopers & Lybrand (Hong
Kong); Phoenix Venture (BVI) Limited; H & Q Ventures
International C.V.; H & Q Ventures IV; William R.
Hambrecht, as Trustee of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
196 cases
- In re Thornburg Mortg., Inc. Sec.Litig.
-
In re N.M. Indirect Purchasers Microsoft
... ... that deference under the abuse of discretion standard is afforded the court's choice to use either method for calculating an award); Gottlieb v. Barry, 43 F.3d 474, 487 (10th Cir.1994); Edwards, 920 P.2d at 757-58; Gen. Motors Corp. v. Bloyed, 916 S.W.2d 949, 960-61 (Tex.1996) ... ...
- Fallen v. Grep Sw., LLC
-
Kuhnlein v. Department of Revenue
... ... Sec. Litig., 19 F.3d 1291 (9th Cir.1994); Florin v. Nationsbank, 34 F.3d 560 (7th Cir1994); Gottlieb v. Barry, 43 F.3d 474 (10th Cir.1994); Rawlings v. Prudential-Bache Props., Inc., 9 F.3d 513 (6th Cir.1993); but see Longden v. Sunderman, 979 F.2d ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Money matters: judicial market interventions creating subsidies and awarding fees and costs in individual and aggregate litigation.
...objection"). Courts have awarded fees to objectors upon finding that objectors have improved outcomes. See, e.g., Gottlieb v. Barry, 43 F. 3d 474, 491 n.16 (10th Cir. 1994); In re Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp. Sec. Litig., 3 F. Supp. 2d 1208, 1214 (D.N.M. 1998); Petruzzi's Inc. v. Darling-De......
-
CHAPTER 8 CURRENT TRENDS IN CLASS ACTION ROYALTY SETTLEMENTS
...920 P.2d 884, 891 (Colo. App. 1996). [33] Kern, Approval of a Class Action Settlement Under C.R.C.P. 23(E) (citing Gottlieb v. Barry, 43 F.3d 474 (10th Cir. 1994)); Highley, 920 P.2d at 889. [34] Kern, Approval of a Class Action Settlement Under C.R.C.P. 23(E) . [35] 12 Okla. Stat. § 12-202......
-
How Class Action Fees Work in the Eleventh Circuit
...has discretion to use either lodestar or the percentage-of-the-fund method, but is encouraged to employ a crosscheck); Gottlieb v. Barry, 43 F.3d 474, 482-83 (10th Cir. 1994) ("Our approach has been called a 'hybrid' approach, combining the percentage fee method with the specific factors tr......