Gould v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 02 November 1904 |
Citation | 132 F. 927 |
Parties | GOULD v. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas |
J. M. & J. G. Taylor, for plaintiff.
Rose Hemingway & Rose, for defendant New York Life Ins. Co.
White & Altheimer, for defendant Sallie A. McKenzie.
This cause having been submitted to the court, a trial by jury having been waived, the court made the following findings of facts:
The plaintiff is trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of B. F McKenzie, who died after the adjudication in bankruptcy. He seeks to recover by this action the sum of $5,000 from the defendant insurance company on a policy issued by it on May 16, 1903, on the life of the deceased bankrupt. The policy was a twenty annual payment life policy, payable upon the death of the assured to his executors, administrators, or assigns. The widow of the deceased bankrupt having made a claim for the money as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband and also as the widow, the insurance company declined to pay the money, whereupon this suit was instituted, making the insurance company and the administratrix and widow of the deceased bankrupt parties defendants. The insurance company admitted an indebtedness of $4,731.92 on the policy, and paid the money into court, leaving it to the court to determine who is entitled thereto. The other defendants filed separate answers, the administratrix claiming the fund as belonging to the estate, and the widow claiming dower if it is held that the money belongs to the trustee in bankruptcy. Other facts agreed upon by the parties and adopted by the court as part of its findings of facts are as follows: 'The court further finds that the policy had no substantial value at the time of the bankrupt's adjudication, its only value being speculative, depending upon the death of the bankrupt before July 16, 1904.
The determination of the questions of law involved in this case depends upon the construction of section 70 of the bankruptcy act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat.565 (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3451)). Neither the Supreme Court of the United States nor the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for this, the Eighth, Circuit, the only courts whose judgments are conclusive on this court, has ever construed this section on the issues involved herein. While there are a number of decisions of other courts on this subject, they are anything but harmonious. The court must, therefore, determine this cause according to its own judgment, aided by the reasoning of the learned judges who have heretofore passed upon these questions.
Section 70 of the bankruptcy act, which is entitled 'Title to Property,' provides what property of the bankrupt shall pass to the trustee.
After enumerating certain specific kinds of property in the first four subdivisions, the fifth is as follows:
'Property which prior to the filing of the petition he could by any means have transferred, or which might have been levied upon and sold under judicial process against him, provided that when any bankrupt shall have any insurance policy which has a cash surrender value, payable to himself, his estate or personal representatives, he may, within thirty days after the cash surrender value has been ascertained and stated to the trustee by the company issuing the same, pay or secure to the trustee the sums so ascertained and stated and continue to hold, own and carry such policy free from the claims of the creditors participating in the distribution of his estate under the bankruptcy proceedings; otherwise the policy shall pass to the trustee as assets.'
The contention of the learned counsel for the defendant is that under this provision the title to a life policy, payable as the one in controversy is, to the assured's executors administrators, or assigns, does not pass to the trustee in bankruptcy, because it has no surrender value. The intent of Congress, as clearly expressed in section 70, was that the title to all property of the bankrupt not exempt under the laws of the state where the bankrupt resides from levy or sale under execution, and from the sale of which by the trustee something may be realized for the benefit of the bankrupt's creditors, should vest in the trustee. It will be noticed that this subdivision 5, Sec. 70a, 30 Stat. 566 (U.S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3451), provides for the vesting in the trustee of the title, not only of all property subject to seizure or sale under judicial process, but also all property which, prior to the filing of the petition, the bankrupt might have transferred. This practically covers everything which the bankrupt might own, and from which, by...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dreyfus v. Barton
...says "that the trustee shall be vested with the title to property which is not exempted." In re Shingluff, 106 F. 154; Gould v. New York Life Ins. Co., 132 F. 927; Warnock v. Davis, 104 U.S. 775; Cammack v. Lewis, Wall. 643; Buelow, 98 F. 86; Josephon, 121 F. 142. Appellant attempts to draw......
-
Davis, State Bank Commissioner v. Cramer
... ... Jones carried an insurance policy in the ... Union Central Life Insurance Company for the sum of $ 10,000, ... originally payable to his ... in a note to Hise v. Hartford Life Ins ... Co., 90 Ky. 101, 29 Am. St. Rep. 358, 364, says: ... "The great ... ...
-
Towson v. Denson
... ... 423, 15 Peters 423, 445, ... 10 L.Ed. 791; Gould v. New York Life Insurance ... Co., 132 F. 927 ... ...
-
In re McCahan's Estate
...In this last case the policy had no value since no premiums had been paid, only a note of the insured having been given. The court said at page 931: ". . there was nothing to pass to the trustee except the right to speculate on the bankrupt's life for a short time; and neither the Bankruptc......