Gould v. State
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
| Citation | Gould v. State, 29 Ala.App. 57, 191 So. 402 (Ala. App. 1939) |
| Decision Date | 30 June 1939 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 395. |
| Parties | GOULD v. STATE. |
Rehearing Denied Oct. 3, 1939.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Shelby County; W. W. Wallace, Judge.
I. L. Gould was convicted of grand larceny, and he appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
L. H. Ellis, of Columbiana, for appellant.
Thos. S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and L. L. Mooneyham, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
In a prosecution for any indictable crime conviction cannot stand under indictment which does not carry endorsement "a true bill" signed by foreman of grand jury. Code 1923, § 8682; Parker v. State, 25 Ala.App. 413, 147 So. 649; Whitley v. State, 166 Ala. 42, 52 So. 203, and many other cases that might be cited.
The record before us fails to show the signature of the foreman of the grand jury affixed to the endorsement "a true bill" appearing on the indictment. The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded. Authorities supra.
It is so ordered.
Reversed and remanded.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Brittain v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
... ... 57 BRITTAIN v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA. 7 Div. 460.Court of Appeals of AlabamaJune 30, 1939 ... an established rule of pleading in this State that in ... considering the sufficiency of the averments ... ...
-
Goulden v. State
...the judgment. Thorn v. State, 39 Ala.App. 227, 98 So.2d 859(3); Kennedy v. State, 39 Ala.App. 676, 107 So.2d 913(26); Gould v. State, 29 Ala.App. 57, 191 So. 402. See also Dowdy v. State, 24 Ala.App. 333, 134 So. 896, for a list of other '* * * In Smiley v. State, 11 Ala.App. 67, 65 So. 916......
- Hodges v. Wiles, 8 Div. 803.
- Hamilton v. State, 8 Div. 829.