Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Dizol, 95-17393
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
| Citation | Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Dizol, 118 F.3d 661 (9th Cir. 1997) |
| Decision Date | 26 June 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-17393,95-17393 |
| Parties | GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander DIZOL, Special Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Tate Dizol, Deceased, Defendant-Appellant. |
Prior report: 108 F.3d 999.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
1 cases
-
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. F.H.
...granted rehearing en banc in Dizol, and these requirements presumably will be reexamined. See Government Employees Ins. Co. v. Dizol, 118 F.3d 661 (9th Cir. 1997) (granting rehearing en banc). We need not await that event, however, because the district court's exercise of discretion in this......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Denial of Plan Confirmation and Finality - Supreme Court's Resolution of Circuit Split May Apply to Chapter 11
...F.3d 857 (6th Cir. 2013) (Chapter 11 plan). 5 In re Lewis, 992 F.2d 767, 773–74 (8th Cir. 1993) (Chapter 13 plan). 6 In re Lievsay, 118 F.3d 661, 662–63 (9th Cir. 1997) (Chapter 11 plan). Circuits7 agree that the denial of plan confirmation is not final and appealable because significant fu......