Government of Virgin Islands v. Bellott, 72-2057.
Citation | 495 F.2d 1393 |
Decision Date | 27 March 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 72-2057.,72-2057. |
Parties | GOVERNMENT OF the VIRGIN ISLANDS v. Parry BELLOTT, Appellant. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) |
Julio A. Brady, Joel D. Sacks, U. S. Attys., Frederick G. Watts, Asst. U. S. Atty., Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V. I., for appellee.
Geoffrey W. Barnard, Isherwood, Colianni, Christiansted, St. Croix, V. I., for appellant.
Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and GIBBONS and WEIS, Circuit Judges.
Perry Bellott was indicted for first degree murder, 14 V.I.C. § 922(a), was found guilty by a jury, and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The victim was a paramour with whom Bellott quarreled, apparently over her decision to leave him. The defense offered the testimony of two expert witnesses, a clinical psychologist and a psychiatrist, to the effect that Bellott was, on the date of the offense, suffering from a mental illness and that the act for which he was indicted was committed in consequence of that mental illness. See United States v. Currens, 290 F.2d 751 (3d Cir. 1961). The government, to meet its burden of proof on the issue of sanity, relied on the observations of persons who saw and dealt with Bellott shortly after the event. With respect to the expert testimony and the government's burden the trial court, in an opinion dealing with post-verdict motions said:
Bellott's position on the post-verdict motion is consistent with Defendant's Requested Instruction No. 5. Bellott requested a charge:
"In this case, the issue of the mental capacity of the defendant to commit the criminal act alleged in the complaint — that is, the question of whether or not his conduct resulted from a mental illness — has been sufficiently raised by the defendant, and the burden of proving sanity as an element of this case beyond a reasonable doubt is on the prosecution."
The trial court rejected this charge and the instruction given follows:
The effect of this charge was to place upon the defendant a burden of proof on the issue of his capacity to commit the offense, which he must first overcome before the government has the burden of establishing sanity beyond a reasonable doubt. That charge was improper.
In Davis v. United States, 160 U.S. 469, 16 S.Ct. 353, 40 L.Ed. 499 (1895), the Court considered a charge:
160 U.S. at 478, 16 S.Ct. at 354.
Reversing, Justice Harlan, for a unanimous court wrote:
160 U.S. at 484, 486-488, 16 S.Ct. at 357. See also Davis v. United States, 165 U.S. 373, 378, 17 S.Ct. 360, 41 L.Ed. 750 (1897); Matheson v. United States...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Government of Virgin Islands v. Fredericks
...has given some indication that the Currens test may properly be used in the Virgin Islands. See Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bellott, 495 F.2d 1393, 1397-98 & n.3 (3d Cir. 1974). Both parties to this appeal seem to have accepted the trial judge's use of Currens language; no objection......
-
U.S. v. Graves
...F.2d 165, 166-67, n. 2 (7th Cir. 1972); United States v. DuShane, 435 F.2d 187, 190 (2d Cir. 1970).23 E. g., Government of Virgin Islands v. Bellott, 495 F.2d 1393 (3d Cir. 1974). See also United States v. Allegrucci, 258 F.2d 70 (3d Cir. 1958) (unexplained possession of recently stolen pro......
-
U.S. v. DiGilio
...DiGilio was indicted. Compare Davis v. United States, 160 U.S. 469, 16 S.Ct. 353, 40 L.Ed. 499 (1895); Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bellott, 495 F.2d 1393 (3d Cir. 1974) (sanity at the time of the offense). Moreover, the government is not, on every subsidiary issue arising during the......
-
U.S. v. Alvarez
... ... The government called three psychiatrists. As to two of these, John ... Government of the Virgin Islands v. Bellott, 495 F.2d 1393 (3d Cir. 1974). Faced ... ...