Governor v. Nevada State Legislature

Decision Date10 July 2003
Docket NumberNo. 41679.,41679.
PartiesHonorable Kenny GUINN, Governor of the State of Nevada, Petitioner, v. The LEGISLATURE OF The STATE OF NEVADA; Honorable Lorraine T. Hunt, President of the Senate; Honorable Richard D. Perkins, Speaker of the Assembly; Mark E. Amodei, Senator; Terry Care, Senator; Maggie Carlton, Senator; Barbara Cegavske, Senator; Bob Coffin, Senator; Warren B. Hardy, Senator; Bernice Mathews, Senator; Mike McGinness, Senator; Joseph M. Neal, Jr., Senator; Dennis Nolan, Senator; Ann O'Connell, Senator; William J. Raggio, Senator; Raymond D. Rawson, Senator; Dean A. Rhoads, Senator; Michael Schneider, Senator; Raymond C. Shaffer, Senator; Sandra Tiffany, Senator; Dina Titus, Senator; Randolph Townsend, Senator; Maurice Washington, Senator; Valerie Wiener, Senator; Bernie Anderson, Assemblyman; Walter Andonov, Assemblyman; Sharron E. Angle, Assemblywoman; Morse Arberry, Jr., Assemblyman; Kelvin D. Atkinson, Assemblyman; Bob Beers, Assemblyman; David Brown, Assemblyman; Barbara E. Buckley, Assemblywoman; John C. Carpenter, Assemblyman; Vonne S. Chowning, Assemblywoman; Chad Christensen, Assemblyman; Jerry D. Claborn, Assemblyman; Tom Collins, Assemblyman; Marcus Conklin, Assemblyman; Jason Geddes, Assemblyman; Dawn Gibbons, Assemblywoman; Chris Giunchigliani, Assemblywoman; Pete Goicoechea, Assemblyman; David Goldwater, Assemblyman; Tom Grady, Assemblyman; Josh Griffin, Assemblyman; Don Gustavson, Assemblyman; Joe Hardy, Assemblyman; Lynn C. Hettrick, Assemblyman; William C. Horne, Assemblyman; Ron Knecht, Assemblyman; Ellen M. Koivisto, Assemblywoman; Sheila Leslie, Assemblywoman; R. Garn Mabey, Jr., Assemblyman; Mark A. Manendo, Assemblyman; John A. Marvel, Assemblyman; Kathy McClain, Assemblywoman; Bob McCleary, Assemblyman; Harry Mortenson, Assemblyman; John Oceguera, Assemblyman; Genie Ohrenschall, Assemblywoman; David R. Parks, Assemblyman; Peggy Pierce, Assemblywoman; Rod Sherer, Assemblyman; Valerie Weber, Assemblywoman; and Wendell P. Williams, Assemblyman, Respondents. Lynn Hettrick; Garn Mabey; Bob Beers; Valerie Weber; Chad Christensen; Walter Andonov; David Brown; Sharron Angle; Don Gustavson; John Marvel; John Carpenter; Pete Goicoechea; Rod Sherer; Tom Grady; Ron Knecht; Barbara Cegavske; Mike McGinness; Ann O'Connell; Sandra Tiffany, and Maurice Washington, Members of the Legislature of Nevada, Counter-Petitioners, v. Honorable Kenny Guinn, Governor of the State of Nevada, and the Legislature of the State of Nevada, Counter-Respondents.
CourtNevada Supreme Court

Brian Sandoval, Attorney General, and Jeff E. Parker, Solicitor General, Carson City, for Petitioner and Counter-Respondent.

Brenda J. Erdoes, Legislative Counsel, Carson City, for Respondents.

Allison, MacKenzie, Russell, Pavlakis, Wright & Fagan, Ltd., and Mark E. Amodei, Carson City, for Respondents Care and Amodei.

Barbara E. Buckley, Carson City, in Proper Person.

Beckley Singleton, Chtd., and Daniel F. Polsenberg and Beau Sterling, Las Vegas, for Counter-Petitioners.

Jeffrey S. Blanck, General Counsel, Washoe County School District, Reno; Walther Key Maupin Oats Cox & LeGoy and Michael E. Malloy, Reno, for Amicus Curiae Washoe County School District.

Dyer, Lawrence, Penrose, Flaherty & Donaldson and Michael W. Dyer, Carson City, for Amici Curiae Nevada State Education Association, Clark County Education Association, Education Support Employees Association of Clark County, and Washoe Education Association.

Ellsworth Moody & Bennion, Chtd., and Keen L. Ellsworth, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae Nevada Congress of Parents and Teachers Association.

C.W. Hoffman Jr., General Counsel, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae Clark County School District.

Law Offices of Thomas D. Beatty and Thomas D. Beatty, Las Vegas, for Amici Curiae Clark County Association of School Administrators, Washoe County Education Administrators, and Nevada Association of School Administrators.

McCracken Stemerman Bowen & Holsberry and Richard G. McCracken, Las Vegas, for Amici Curiae Nevada State AFL-CIO and Nevada State Employees Association, AFSCME, Local 4041.

McDonald Carano Wilson LLP and John J. Laxague, Michael A.T. Pagni, Jeffrey A. Silvestri and Thomas R.C. Wilson II, Reno, for Amici Curiae Nevada Taxpayers Association, Associated Builders and Contractors-Sierra Nevada Chapter, AGC Nevada, Nevada Association of Mechanical Contractors, Sierra Chemical Company, Polymer Plastics Corporation, Barth Electronics, EDAWN/ Western Nevada Development Authority, Nevada Consumer Finance Corporation, Nevada Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association, Cal-Neva Franchise Owners Association, 7-Eleven Franchise Owners Association of Southern Nevada, Nevada Resident Agents Association, Monte L. Miller and Joshua C. Miller, Nevada Bankers Association, Nevada Manufacturers Association, Nevada Motor Transport Association, Retail Association of Nevada, Tiberti Fence Company, Carson City Chamber of Commerce, Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce, Nevada Franchised Auto Dealers Association, Nevadans for Real Tax Fairness, Household International, Nevada Corporate Headquarters—Cort Christie, Robert List, Henderson Chamber of Commerce, Thomas Powell, Pic-Mount Imaging, Corp., Phoenix Holdings of Nevada, Inc., Nevada Association of Independent Businesses, Chain Drug Council of Nevada, and Grocery Industry Council of Nevada.

Thomas J. Ray, General Counsel, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae University and Community College System of Nevada.

James T. Richardson, Reno, for Amicus Curiae Nevada Faculty Alliance.

Layne T. Rushforth, Las Vegas, for Amicus Curiae Nevada Concerned Citizens.

Wilson & Barrows and Stewart R. Wilson, Elko; Gregory T. Broderick, Sacramento, California, for Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

Before the Court En Banc.

OPINION

AGOSTI, C.J.

The Governor of Nevada has petitioned this court for a writ of mandamus declaring the Legislature to be in violation of the Nevada Constitution, and compelling the Legislature to fulfill its constitutional duty to approve a balanced budget—including an annual tax to defray the state's estimated expenses for the biennium beginning July 1, 2003, and appropriations to fund public education during that fiscal period—by a time certain. We agree that our intervention is appropriate in this extraordinary circumstance.

The Legislature failed to fund education in the 72nd Regular Session and in two special sessions and is evidently in a deadlock over the means of raising the necessary revenues. As a result, Nevada's public educational institutions are in crisis because they are unable to proceed with the preparations and functions necessary for the 2003-2004 school year.

It is apparent that the Legislature has failed to fulfill its constitutional mandate because of the conflict among several provisions of the Nevada Constitution. Therefore, we, in our judicial role as interpreters of the Nevada Constitution, must reconcile the provisions which cause the present crisis.

Because we conclude that the individual legislators and the Lieutenant Governor have not violated their constitutional duties, we deny the petition as to them as individuals. We grant the petition as to the Legislature as a body. We order the Legislature to fulfill its obligations under the Constitution of Nevada by raising sufficient revenues to fund education while maintaining a balanced budget. Due to the impasse that has resulted from the procedural and general constitutional requirement of passing revenue measures by a two-thirds majority, we conclude that this procedural requirement must give way to the substantive and specific constitutional mandate to fund public education. Therefore, we grant the petition in part and order the clerk of this court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the Legislature of the State of Nevada to proceed expeditiously with the 20th Special Session under simple majority rule.

DISCUSSION

The Governor filed this writ petition after the Legislature failed to approve a balanced budget before the start of fiscal year 2004, which started on July 1, 2003. The Governor is responsible for the faithful execution1 of the state's laws and is also responsible for proposing a state budget and submitting it to the Legislature.2 Pursuant to Article 9, Section 2 of our Constitution, the Legislature is responsible for approving a balanced budget. Also, Article 11, Section 6 of our Constitution compels the Legislature to support and maintain the public school system.3 The Legislature must appropriate the money needed for all state government expenditures and provide for an annual tax to defray the state's estimated expenses for the two fiscal years following its regular biennial session.4 Fiscal year 2004 began on July 1,5 yet the Legislature has thus far failed in its obligation to support and maintain the public school system. No money has been appropriated to fund this constitutionally mandated obligation. Our Constitution's Article 4, Section 19 provides that the State Treasurer cannot release general funds from the state treasury without specific legislative appropriation.

The Governor began the 2003 legislative session with a request for $980 million in new revenues to balance his proposed budget for the 2003-2005 biennium. The Legislature did not fund education in its 72nd Regular Session, which ended on June 3, 2003,6 but, after making substantial cuts in the Governor's budget, appropriated $3,264,269,361 for various government functions. The Governor signed these appropriations into law.7 Existing revenues are expected to meet these appropriations.

Since the conclusion of the Legislature's general session, two special sessions have been convened. On June 3, 2003, the Governor convened the Legislature in the 19th Special Session to appropriate funds for the K-12 school system and to provide an adequate tax plan to provide for funding. The Legislature failed to reach an agreement on a tax...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Shea v. State
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • May 26, 2022
    ... ... The STATE of Nevada ; the State of Nevada Department of Education ; Jhone Ebert, Nevada Superintendent of Public ... provisions demonstrates a clear, textual commitment of public education to the Nevada Legislature by granting the Legislature broad discretionary authority over such matters. Because Shea's claims ... ...
  • Nevadans for Nevada v. Beers
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • September 8, 2006
    ... Page 339 ... 142 P.3d 339 ... NEVADANS FOR NEVADA, a Nevada Nonprofit Corporation; Nevada State Education Association, a Nevada Nonprofit Corporation; Nevadans for Quality Education, a Nevada ... Fund" and "Emergency Reserve Fund," restricting the definition of "emergency," barring the Governor and Legislature from appropriating funds in the event of a fiscal emergency; (4) prohibit the state ... ...
  • Landreth v. Malik
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • May 12, 2011
    ... ... Amit MALIK, Respondent. No. 49732. Supreme Court of Nevada. May 12, 2011 ... [251 P.3d 164] Hansen Rasmussen, LLC, and ... Breckenridge, Reno, for Amicus Curiae Family Law Section of Nevada State Bar.Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg, and Robert Eisenberg, Reno, for Amicus ... First, we consider whether the Legislature has the constitutional authority to limit the powers of a district court ... Cf. Governor v. Nevada State Legislature, 119 Nev. 277, 287, 71 P.3d 1269, 127576 ... ...
  • Nat'l Ass'n of Mut. Ins. Cos. v. State Dep't of Bus. & Indus.
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • February 16, 2023
    ... ... THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, DIVISION OF INSURANCE; AND BARBARA D. RICHARDSON, IN HER ... ensure the use of this information is fair and not ... discriminatory. The governor's COVID-19 declaration of ... emergency led to mass unemployment across Nevada and a ... P.3d 886, 894 (2016). We also recognize statutory standing in ... cases where the Legislature has created a right and provided ... a statutory vehicle to vindicate that right that relaxes ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The futile quest for a system of judicial "merit" selection.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 67 No. 3, March 2004
    • March 22, 2004
    ...531 U.S. 98 (2000); Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973); Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1856); Guinn v. Legislature of Nev., 71 P.3d 1269, reh'g denied, 76 P.3d 22 (Nev. 2003); N.J. Democratic Party, Inc. v. Samson, 814 A.2d 1028 (N.J.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1083 (2002). Prof......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT